Waste-to-energy (WtE) or energy-from-waste (EfW) refers to any waste treatment that creates energy in the form of
electricityor heatfrom a waste source. Such technologies reduce or eliminate waste that otherwise would be transferred to a " greenhouse gas" emitting landfillcn. WtE is a form of energy recovery. Most WtE processes produce electricity directly through combustion, or produce a combustible fuel commodity, such as methane, methanol, ethanolor synthetic fuelscn.
Incineration, the combustion of organic material such as waste, with energy recovery is the most common WtE implementation. Incineration may also be implemented without energy and materials recovery, but this is increasingly being banned in
OECD(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countriesFact|date=May 2008. Furthermore, all new WtE plants in OECD countries must meet strict emission standardsFact|date=May 2008. Hence, modern incineration plants are vastly different from the old types, some of which neither recovered energy nor materials. Modern incinerators reduce the volume of the original waste by 95-96 %, depending upon composition and degree of recovery of materials such as metals from the ash for recycling [http://www.zmag.dk/showmag.php?mid=wsdps Waste to Energy in Denmark] by RambollConsult] .
Concerns regarding the operation of incinerators include fine particulate, heavy metals, trace dioxin and acid gas emissions, even though these emissions are relatively low [http://www2.dmu.dk/1_viden/2_Publikationer/3_fagrapporter/rapporter/FR442.pdf Emissionsfaktorer og emissionsopgørelse for decentral kraftvarme] , Kortlægning af emissioner fra decentrale kraftvarmeværker,
Ministry of the Environment of Denmark2006 (in Danish)] from modern incinerators. Other concerns include toxic fly ash and incinerator bottom ash (IBA) managementFact|date=May 2008. Discussions regarding waste resource ethics include the opinion that incinerators destroy valuable resources and the fear that they may reduce the incentives for recycling and waste minimization activitiesFact|date=May 2008. Incinerators have electric efficiencies on the order of 14-28%Fact|date=May 2008. The rest of the energy can be utilized for e.g. district heating, but is otherwise lost as waste heat.
WtE technologies other than incineration
There are a number of other new and emerging technologies that are able to produce energy from waste and other fuels without direct combustion. Many of these technologies have the potential to produce more electric power from the same amount of fuel than would be possible by direct combustion. This is mainly due to the separation of corrosive components (ash) from the converted fuel, thereby allowing a higher combustion temperatures in e.g.
boilers, gas turbines, internal combustion engines, fuel cells. Some are able to efficiently convert the energy into liquid or gaseous fuels:
Gasification(produces combustible gas, hydrogen, synthetic fuels)
Thermal depolymerization(produces synthetic crude oil, which can be further refined)
Pyrolysis(produces combustible tar/ biooiland chars)
Plasma arc gasification PGPor plasma gasification process (produces rich syngasincluding Hydrogenand Carbon Monoxideusable for fuel cells or generating electricity to drive the plasma arch, useable vitrified silicate and metal ingots, salt and sulphur)
Gasplasma- A integrated process of front end gasification of shreaded waste to syngases, plasma arc treatment of syngas and syngas cleaning and conditioning. Syngas, Plasmarok, Hydrogen, Carbon monoxideand CHPare the outputs. Residuals to landfill is less than 1%.
Anaerobic digestion( Biogasrich on methane)
Mechanical biological treatment
Anaerobic digestionor Advanced MBT AMBT
Refuse derived fuel
Measurement of the biomass fraction of waste for greenhouse gas abatement protocols
biomassfraction of waste has a monetary value under multiple greenhouse gas protocols, such as the AB 32 program in California and the Renewable Obligation Certificate program in the United Kingdom. Biomass is considered to be carbon-neutral since the CO2 liberated from the combustion of biomass is recycled in plants. The combusted biomass fraction of waste is used by waste to energy plants to reduce their overall reported CO2 emissions.
Several methods have been developed by the European CEN 343 working group to determine the biomass fraction of waste fuels, such as
Refuse Derived Fuel/Solid Recovered Fuel. The initial two methods developed (CEN/TS 15440) were the manual sorting method and the selective dissolution method. Since each method suffered from limitations in properly characterizing the biomass fraction, two alternative methods have been developed.
One using the principles of
radiocarbon dating. A technical review (CEN/TR 15591:2007) outlining the carbon 14 method was published in 2007. A technical standard of the carbon dating method (CEN/TS 15747:2008) will be published in 2008. In the United States, there is already an equivalent carbon 14 method under the standard method ASTM D6866.
The second method (so called balance method) employs existing data on materials composition and operating conditions of the incinerator and calculates the most probable result based on a mathematical-statistical model (Fellner et al., 2007). Currently the balance method is installed at three Austrian incinerators.
A comparison between both methods carried out at three full-scale incinerators in Switzerland showed that both methods came to the same results (Mohn et al., 2008).
Although carbon 14 dating can determine with some precision the biomass fraction of waste, it cannot determine directly the biomass calorific value. Determining the calorific value is important for green certificate programs such as the Renewable Obligation Certificate program in the United Kingdom. These programs award certificates based on the energy produced from biomass. Several research papers, including the one commissioned by the Renewable Energy Association in the UK, have been published that demonstrate how the carbon 14 result can be used to calculate the biomass calorific value. By contrast the balance method delivers all required information, namely, the ratio between biogenic and fossil energy production, as well as relative and total biogenic and fossil mass and carbon fractions. Moreover it requires no additional measurements and is therefore easy to install at low costs.
List of solid waste treatment technologies
* [http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert Waste-to-Energy Research and Technology Council]
Fellner, J., Cencic, O. and Rechberger, H., 2007. "A New Method to Determine the Ratio of Electricity Production from Fossil and Biogenic Sources in Waste-to-Energy Plants." In: "Environmental Science & Technology," 41(7): 2579-2586.
Mohn, J., Szidat, S., Fellner, J., Rechberger, H., Quartier, R., Buchmann, B. and Emmenegger, L., 2008. "Determination of biogenic and fossil CO2 emitted by waste incineration based on 14CO2 and mass balances." In: "Bioresource Technology," 99: 6471-6479.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.