Peremptory norm

Peremptory norm

A peremptory norm (also called "jus cogens" or "ius cogens", Latin for "compelling law") is a fundamental principle of international law which is accepted by the international community of states as a norm from which no derogation is ever permitted.

There is no clear agreement regarding precisely which norms are "jus cogens" — or indeed how a norm reaches the status of "jus cogens" — but it is generally accepted that "jus cogens" includes the prohibition of genocide, maritime piracy, slaving in general (to include slavery as well as the slave trade), torture, wars of aggression and territorial aggrandizement and the prohibition on the use of force by states.

tatus of peremptory norms under international law

Unlike ordinary customary law, which has traditionally required consent and allows the alteration of its obligations between states through treaties, peremptory norms cannot be violated by any state "through international treaties or local or special customs or even general customary rules not endowed with the same normative force". [Prosecutor v. Furundzija, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 2002, 121 "International Law Reports" 213 (2002)]

Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, any treaty that conflicts with a peremptory norm is void. [Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 53, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S 331, 8 "International Legal Materials" 679 (1969)] The treaty allows for the emergence of new peremptory norms, [Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 64, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S 331, 8 "International Legal Materials" 679 (1969)] but does not itself specify any peremptory norms.

"A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character." [ U.N. Doc. A/CONF.39/27 (1969), repinted in 63 Am. J. Int'l L. 875 (1969).]

The number of peremptory norms is considered limited but not exclusively catalogued. They are not listed or defined by any authoritative body, but arise out of case law and changing social and political attitudes. Generally included are prohibitions on waging aggressive war, crimes against humanity, war crimes, maritime piracy, genocide, slavery, and torture. [Marc Bossuyt en Jan Wouters (2005): "Grondlijnen van internationaal recht", Intersentia, Antwerpen enz., p. 92.] [Prosecutor v. Furundžija, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 2002, 121 "International Law Reports" 213 (2002)]

Despite the seemingly clear weight of condemnation of such practices, some critics disagree with the division of international legal norms into a hierarchy. There is also disagreement over how such norms are recognized or established. The relatively new concept of peremptory norms is at odds with the traditionally consensual nature of international law considered necessary to state sovereignty.

Some peremptory norms define criminal offences which are considered to be enforceable against not only states, but individuals as well. This has been increasingly accepted since the Nuremberg Trials (the first enforcement in world history of international norms upon individuals) and now might be considered uncontroversial. However, the language of peremptory norms was not used in connection with these trials - rather the basis of criminalisation and punishment of Nazi atrocities was that civilisation could not tolerate their being ignored, because it could not survive their being repeated.

There are often disagreements over whether a particular case violates a peremptory norm. As in other areas of law, states generally reserve the right to interpret the concept for themselves.

Examples

Execution of juvenile offenders

The case of Michael Domingues v. United States provides an example of an international body's opinion that a particular norm is of a "jus cogens" nature. Michael Domingues had been convicted and sentenced to death in Nevada, United States for two murders committed when he was 16 years old. Domingues brought the case in front of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights which delivered a non-legally binding report. [The Michael Domingues Case: Argument of the United States, Office of the Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, "Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2001, at 303, 310-13] The United States argued that there was no "jus cogens" norm that "establishes eighteen years as the minimum age at which an offender can receive a sentence of death". [The Michael Domingues Case: Argument of the United States, Office of the Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, "Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2001, at 303, 310-13] The Commission concluded that there was a "jus cogens" norm not to impose capital punishment on individuals who committed their crimes when they had not yet reached 18 years of age." [The Michael Domingues Case: Report on the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No. 62/02, Merits, Case 12.285 (2002)] The United States has subsequently banned the execution of juvenile offenders, although not necessarily in response to the above non-binding report (Roper v. Simmons).

Torture

The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia stated in "Prosecutor v. Furundžija" that there is a "jus cogens" for the prohibition against torture. [Prosecutor v. Furundžija, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 2002, 121 "International Law Reports" 213 (2002)] It also stated that every State is entitled "to investigate, prosecute and punish or extradite individuals accused of torture, who are present in a territory under its jurisdiction." [Prosecutor v. Furundžija, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 2002, 121 "International Law Reports" 213 (2002)] Therefore, there is universal jurisdiction over torture. The rationale for this is that "the torturer has become, like the pirate and the slave trader before him, "hostis humani generis", an enemy of all mankind." [Janis, M. and Noyes, J. International Law": Cases and Commentary (3rd ed.), Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Page 148 (2006)]

ee also

Universal jurisdiction

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • peremptory norm — n. A principle of international law that is so important and so widely accepted that no state is permitted to deviate from it, such as the prohibitions on genocide, slavery, or piracy. The Essential Law Dictionary. Sphinx Publishing, An imprint… …   Law dictionary

  • Norm — or NORM may refer to: Contents 1 In academia 1.1 In mathematics 2 People 3 Miscellaneous 4 …   Wikipedia

  • Peremptory — can refer to any of the following concepts in law:* Peremptory challenge * Peremptory norm * Peremptory plea …   Wikipedia

  • international law — the body of rules that nations generally recognize as binding in their conduct toward one another. Also called law of nations. Cf. private international law, public international law. [1830 40] * * * Body of legal rules, norms, and standards that …   Universalium

  • Sources of international law — are the materials and processes out of which the rules and principles regulating the international community are developed. They have been influenced by a range of political and legal theories. During the 19th century, it was recognised by legal… …   Wikipedia

  • itinerant vendor — This term is variously defined in statutes; e.g., a person engaged in transient business either in one locality or in traveling from place to place selling goods. See also hawker peddler. lus cogens. A peremptory norm of general international law …   Black's law dictionary

  • itinerant vendor — This term is variously defined in statutes; e.g., a person engaged in transient business either in one locality or in traveling from place to place selling goods. See also hawker peddler. lus cogens. A peremptory norm of general international law …   Black's law dictionary

  • jus cogens — jus co·gens / kä gənz, kō gens/ n [New Latin, literally, constraining law]: a principle of international law that is based on values taken to be fundamental to the international community and that cannot be set aside (as by treaty) it is doubtful …   Law dictionary

  • List of law topics (N-R) — NOTOC Law [From Old English lagu something laid down or fixed ; legal comes from Latin legalis , from lex law , statute ( [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=law searchmode=none Law] , Online Etymology Dictionary; [http://www.m… …   Wikipedia

  • Genocide — This article is about the crime. For other uses, see Genocide (disambiguation). Buchenwald concentration camp was technically not an extermination camp, though it was a site of an extraordinary number of deaths …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”