- Japanese general election, 2003
Infobox Election
election_name = Japanese general election, 2003
country = Japan
type = parliamentary
ongoing = no
previous_election = Japanese general election, 2000
previous_year = 2000
next_election = Japanese general election, 2005
next_year = 2005
seats_for_election = All 480 seats to theHouse of Representatives of Japan
election_date =November 9 ,2003
leader1 =Junichiro Koizumi
party1 = Liberal Democratic Party (Japan)
leaders_seat1 =Kanagawa - 11th District
last_election1 = 239 seats, 40.97%
seats1 = 237
seat_change1 = -2
popular_vote1 = 26,089,326(single seat)
percentage1 = 43.85%(single seat)
leader2 =Naoto Kan
party2 = Democratic Party of Japan
leaders_seat2 =Tokyo - 18th District
last_election2 = 129 seats, 27.61%
seats2 = 177
seat_change2 = +48
popular_vote2 = 21,814,154(single seat)
percentage2 = 36.66%(single seat)
title = PM
before_election =Junichiro Koizumi
before_party = Liberal Democratic Party (Japan)
after_election =Junichiro Koizumi
after_party = Liberal Democratic Party (Japan)A general election took place inJapan onNovember 9 ,2003 .Incumbent Prime MinisterJunichiro Koizumi of the Liberal Democrat Party won the election but with a reduced majority. The main opposition Democratic Party made considerable gains, winning 177 of the 480 seats in the House of Representatives, its largest share ever. Other traditional parties like the Communist Party and the Social Democrat Party lost a significant numbers of seats, making atwo-party system a possibility in future Japanese politics.Background
On
October 11 ,2003 , Prime MinisterJunichiro Koizumi dissolved the House of Representatives of the Diet after he was re-elected as the Liberal Democrat Party chief onSeptember 20 . The dissolution was based on Article 7 of theConstitution of Japan , which can be interpreted as saying that the Prime Minister has the power to dissolve the lower house after so advising the Emperor.The election was the first since Koizumi was named Prime Minister in April 2001. The major participants were the Liberal Democrat Party (LDP) and the Democrat Party (DPJ). The LDP retains strong support in rural areas and among older voters due to heavy subsidies inagriculture , while the DPJ has had greater support among youth and in urban areas. However, this has tended to favor the LDP, because sparsely populated rural districts have disproportionate weight in Japan's electoral system.Some of the issues facing candidates were: the ongoing economic recession; reform of the
public pension system ; the extent of Japan's support of the U.S. in Iraq; Japan's relationship withNorth Korea ; and theprivatization of the postal service and Tokyo-area highways.The last general election of the Lower House took place in June 2000 when
Yoshiro Mori was Prime Minister.Results
"For a breakdown of the results by block district with maps, see
Results of Japan general election, 2003 "National newspapers concluded that the election benefitted the Democrat Party (DPJ) more so than the Liberal Democrat Party (LDP). The DPJ actually garnered the plurality of votes and gained 40 more seats, making it the largest opposition party with a total lower-house membership of 177. Among those in the ruling coalition, only the
New Clean Government Party ("New Komeito") made gains, bringing its total lower-house membership to 34 from 31 members before the election. Since Prime Minister Koizumi was unable to gain more seats for the LDP based upon his high approval ratings — around 60% — some experts believe the election has left Koizumi a weakenedPrime Minister while others point out that several of the Non-partisans were really of LDP, most notably 'Kato Koichi' and LDP had in fact maintained the number of seats.The LDP performed well in rural areas while the DPJ performed well in urban areas. The turnout was 59.86%, the second lowest since 1945. The average age of new members of the house was 51.03, 3.2 years younger than in the previous election. Among new members, 302 were born after 1945. After the election, the total number of women in the lower-house decreased to 34 from 35 before the election.
Poll data collected early in the election season and in exit polls highlight the role of
swing vote rs, who accounted for 18% of the total vote. According to "Asahi Shimbun ", more than half of swing voters voted for the DPJ. These exit polls produced highly contradictory preliminary reports. There was a case where DPJ was predicted to capture up to 230 seats, more than 50 above the actual result.The Liberal Democrat Party failed to achieve an absolute majority by itself, requiring it to maintain its coalition with the
New Clean Government Party and theNew Conservative Party . Senior politicians in the LDP attribute the results to disenfranchisement among traditional supporters of the LDP, resulting in an increased dependency on the coalition. Some politicians in the LDP are concerned about the influence of theNew Clean Government Party on LDP policy because of the dependency.Some experts believe the Democrat Party has emerged an effective opposition party to the entrenched Liberal Democrat Party. During the campaign, the DPJ produced an itemized policy manifesto — a first in post-war Japanese elections — and publicized a "shadow cabinet" (with
Naoto Kan as Prime Minister), which is usually created by political parties during election season in theUnited Kingdom , for example. The DPJ also criticized the reforms proposed by Koizumi and the LDP’s sluggishness in their implementation, as well as the LDP's position on Iraq while steering clear on other foreign issues.Smaller parties performed poorly. The Social Democrat Party lost 3 seats, bringing their lower-house membership to 6, while the
Japanese Communist Party lost 11 seats, bringing their total membership to 9 from 20 before the election. Both parties thus lack the ability to propose a law alone since that requires minimum of 10 members. TheNew Conservative Party lost 5 seats, lowering their total to 4 seats from 9 seats, and merged with the LDP shortly after the election. TheJapanese Communist Party blamed the negative results on the media, which they claimed focused on the LDP and DPJ.Although the LDP failed to secure a simple majority, on
November 19 , the Diet appointed Junichiro Koizumi the Prime Minister in its shortspecial session [http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20031120a1.htm] and, within a month, the LDP regained a majority by absorbing the Conservative Party.Numbers in parentheses indicate seats held before the election.
Another presentation of the results
"(Source: [http://psephos.adam-carr.net Adam Carr's Election Archive] , using figures from Yomiuri Online)"
NATIONAL SUMMARY =
These figures are an aggregation of votes cast in the Block constituencies. Votes and seats are compared with those won at the 2000 elections. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seats Party Votes % Con Blk Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Clean Government 8,733,444 14.8 (+01.7) 9 25 34 +05 Communist 4,586,172 07.7 (-03.6) - 9 9 -11 Democrat 22,095,606 37.4 (+11.9) 105 72 177 +48 Liberal Democrat 20,660,185 34.9 (+06.2) 168 69 237 -02 Social Democrat 3,072,390 05.2 (-04.2) 1 5 6 -09 Others - 17 - 17 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 59,102,797 300 180 480 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Con" means seats won in single-member constituencies. "Blk" means seats won by proportional representation in the Block constituencies. Votes for the New Conservative Party are included with the Liberal Democrats, with whom they merged after the elections.
References
* [http://www.mainichi.co.jp/eye/2003senkyo/shugiin/kantaro_ME/art/20031110143746172194.html Analysis of the general election] (in Japanese)
External links
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3246149.stm BBC - Japanese election guide]
* [http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20031110a1.htm The Japan Times - LDP bloc weathers DPJ onslaught]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.