- Surplice
A surplice (
Late Latin "superpelliceum", from "super", "over" and "pellis", "fur") is a liturgicalvestment of the WesternChristian Church . The surplice has the form of atunic of white linen or cotton material, reaching to the knee or to the ankles, with wide or moderately widesleeve s.It was originally a long garment reaching nearly to the ground, as it remains in the English tradition, but in the
Roman Catholic tradition, the surplice is shorter and is sometimes called with theMedieval Latin term "cotta".Origin and variation
The surplice originally reached to the feet, but as early as the 13th century it began to shorten, though as late as the 15th century it still fell to the middle of the shin, and only in the 17th and 18th centuries in
Continental Europe did it become considerably shorter. In several localities it underwent more drastic modifications in the course of time, which led to the appearance of various subsidiary forms alongside the original type. For example:
* the sleeveless surplice, which featured holes at the sides to put the arms through
* the surplice with slit arms or lappets (so-called "wings") instead of sleeves, often worn by organists today, due to the ease of maneuvering the arms
* the surplice with not only the sleeves but the body of the garment itself slit up the sides, precisely like the moderndalmatic
* a sort of surplice in the form of a bell-shaped mantle, with a hole for the head, which necessitated the arms sticking out under the hem.The first two of these forms developed very early; and, in spite of their prohibition by
synod s here and there (for example that of Liège "circa" 1287), they survive in various places to the present day. The latter two only appeared after the close of theMiddle Ages : the first of them in SouthGermany , the second more especially inVenetia , where numerous pictorial records attest its use. As a rule, however, only the lower clergy wore these subsidiary forms of surplice. They came about partly under the influence of secularfashion s, but more particularly for convenience.Lack of exact information obscures the older history of the surplice. Its name derives, as Durandus and
Gerland also affirm, from the fact that its wearers formerly put it on over the fur garments formerly worn in church during divine service as a protection against the cold. Some scholars trace the use of the surplice at least as far back as the 5th century, citing the evidence of the garments worn by the two clerics in attendance on Bishop Maximian represented in themosaics of theBasilica of San Vitale atRavenna ; in this case, however, confusing thedalmatic with the surplice.In all probability the surplice forms no more than an expansion of the ordinary liturgical alb, due to the necessity for wearing it over thick furs. The first documents to mention the surplice date from the 11th century: a canon of the Synod of Coyaca in
Spain (1050); and an ordinance of KingEdward the Confessor .Rome knew the surplice at least as early as the 12th century. It probably originated outside Rome, and was imported thence into the Roman use. Originally only a choir vestment and peculiar to the lower clergy, it gradually - certainly no later than the 13th century — replaced the alb as the vestment proper to the administering of thesacrament s and other sacerdotal functions.The
Eastern Churches do not use a surplice or any analogous vestment. Of the non-Roman Catholic Churches in the West the surplice has continued in regular use in theLutheran churches, in theAnglican Communion , and among variousOld Catholic denominations among others.Roman Catholicism
In the Roman tradition, the surplice or cotta sometimes features [http://www.bethlehem-abbey.org.uk/m6.jpglace decoration] or embroidered
bordure s, but is most typically plainly hemmed. The lace or embroidery, if present, will often be in the form of inserts set a few inches above the edge of the hem or sleeves.The surplice is meant to be a miniature
alb , the alb itself being the symbol of the white garment received atBaptism . As such, it is appropriately worn by anycleric , by lectors andacolytes , or indeed byaltar servers who are technically standing in for instituted acolytes for any liturgical service. It is often worn, for instance, by seminarians when attending Mass and by non-clericalchoir s. It is usually worn over acassock and never alone, nor is it ever gathered by a belt orcincture .It may be worn under a
stole bydeacons andpriests for liturgical ceremonies or the celebration ofsacrament s outside of Mass. On occasion, acope is worn over the cassock, surplice and stole.As part of the choir dress of the clergy, it is normally not worn by
prelate s (thepope , cardinals,bishop s,monsignor i, and some canons) - instead, these clerics wear therochet , which is in fact a variant of the surplice.The surplice belongs to the "vestes sacrae" (sacred vestments), though it requires no
benediction before it is worn.Anglicanism
The second
Anglican Prayer Book, that of Edward VI in 1552, prescribed the surplice as, with thetippet or theacademic hood , the sole vestment of the minister of the church at "all times of their ministration", therochet being practically regarded as the episcopal surplice. The more extreme Reformers furiously assailed its use, but in spite of their efforts, Elizabeth's Act of Uniformity (1559) retained the garment, and the advertisements and injunctions issued under her authority enforced its use, though they ordered the destruction of the "massing vestments" -chasuble s, albs, stoles and the like.The surplice has since remained, with the exception of the cope, the sole vestment authorised by law for the ministers, other than bishops, of the
Church of England (for the question of the vestments prescribed by the "Ornaments Rubric " seevestment ). And apart fromclerk s inHoly Orders , all the "ministers" (including vicars-choral andchorister s) ofcathedral andcollegiate church es, as well as thefellow s and scholars ofcollege s inchapel have worn surplices since the Reformation.The clergy (at least its more dignified members) have employed as a distinctive mark the tippet or scarf mentioned above, a broad band of black silk worn stole-wise, but not to be confused with the
stole , since it has no liturgical significance and originally formed a mere part of the clerical outdoor dress. Formerly the clergy only wore the surplice when conducting the service, and exchanged it during the sermon for the "black gown", i.e. either aGeneva gown or thegown of anacademic degree . This custom has, however, as a result of theHigh Church movement, become almost completely obsolete. The "black gown", considered wrongly as the ensign ofLow Church views, survives in comparatively few even of evangelical churches; however, preachers of university sermons retained the custom of wearing the gown of their degree.The traditional form of the surplice in the Church of England survived from pre-Reformation times: a wide-sleeved, very full, plain, white linen tunic, pleated from the yoke, and reaching almost, or quite, to the feet. Towards the end of the 17th century, when large wigs came into fashion, it became convenient to have surplices constructed gown-wise, open down the front and buttoned at the neck, a fashion which still partially survives, notably at the universities. In general, however, the tendency followed continental influence, and curtailed the surplice's proportions. The ample vestment with beautiful falling folds has thus in many churches given place to a scanty, unpleated garment scarce reaching to the knee. In some
Anglo-Catholic churches, the surplices follow the style of the Roman cotta.Name in other languages
*French — "surplis"
*German — "Chorrock"
*Hungarian — "miseing" or "karing"
*Italian — "cotta"
*Polish — "komża"
*Spanish — "sobrepelliz"
*Maltese — "spellizza"Further reading
*Citation
last =Braun
first =Joseph
contribution =Surplice
year =1912
title =The Catholic Encyclopedia
editor-last =
editor-first =
volume =XIV
pages =
place=New York
publisher =Robert Appleton Company
id =
url = http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14343d.htm
accessdate = 2007-08-18ee also
*
Rochet
*Choir dress "Original text from the
1911 Encyclopædia Britannica ".
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.