Mahe v. Alberta

Mahe v. Alberta
Mahé v. Alberta
Supreme Court of Canada.jpg

Supreme Court of Canada

Hearing: June 14, 1989
Judgment: March 15, 1990
Full case name: Jean‑Claude Mahe, Angeline Martel, Paul Dubé and the Association de l'école Georges et Julia Bugnet v. Her Majesty The Queen in right of the province of Alberta
Citations: [1990] 1 S.C.R. 342
Ruling: Mahe appeal allowed
Court membership

Chief Justice: Brian Dickson
Puisne Justices: Antonio Lamer, Bertha Wilson, Gérard La Forest, Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin

Reasons given

Unanimous reason by: Dickson C.J.

Mahé v. Alberta, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 342 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The ruling is notable because the court established that section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires that parents of the official-language minority in each province have the right either to be representated on the school board, or to have a school board of their own, in order to provide adequate protection for the education rights of their children.

Background

Three Edmonton citizens, Jean-Claude Mahé, Angeline Martel and Paul Dubé, were dissatisfied with the quality of the French language schools provided by the Albertan government. In 1982 they submitted a proposal to the Minister of Education for a new French elementary school that would be administered by a committee of parents within an autonomous French school board.

The Minister of Education told them that it was not in their policy to make such arrangements and so they suggested they try to do it through the public school board. The board rejected them. Mahé and the others brought an action against the government of Alberta for violating their right to a Francophone-run education system under section 23 of the Charter.

The questions before the Supreme Court were:

  1. Have the rights of the Francophone population of Edmonton under section 23(2)(b) of the Charter been violated?
  2. Do the rights under section 23 include the right to manage and control the schools? If so, what is the nature and extent of the management and control?
  3. Does the provincial School Act violate section 23? If so, can it be saved under section 1 of the Charter?
  4. Are the rights affected by section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, section 29 of the Charter, and section 17 of the Alberta Act?

Opinion of the Court

The Court held that section 23 guarantees representation on the school board, and exclusive control over the children's education with respect to culture; or it can guarantee a separate school board. However, there must be sufficient minority language population to warrant either level of protection. In this particular case, the Court decided representation on an existing school board would be sufficient, and held that this did not interfere with denominational school rights under section 29 of the Charter since it merely affected language.

The Court's unanimous decision was given by Chief Justice Brian Dickson He began by examining the purpose of section 23 which is to "preserve and promote the two official languages of Canada, and their respective cultures". The section was intended to be remedial so as to prevent the loss of a minority group's language and cultural identity and so must be interpreted in light of section 15 and 27 of the Charter.

External links



Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Section Twenty-nine of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — is the section of Charter that most specifically addresses rights regarding denominational schools and separate schools. Section 29 is not the source of these rights but instead reaffirms the pre existing special rights belonging to Roman… …   Wikipedia

  • Timeline of official languages policy in Canada — Because the country contains two major language groups, in Canada Official languages policy has always been an important and high profile area of public policy. In an exhaustive 1971 study of Canadian language law prepared for the Royal… …   Wikipedia

  • Greater North Central Francophone Education Region No. 2 — Conseil scolaire Centre Nord Board office location Suite 322 8627 91 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Communities served …   Wikipedia

  • Bibliothèque Saint-Jean — (BSJ) is an academic and research library at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.OverviewThe library is located approximately five kilometres east of the main University of Alberta campus. Its mission is to serve the students… …   Wikipedia

  • Official bilingualism in Canada — Culture of Canada This article is part of a series History Canadians Canadian identity …   Wikipedia

  • Chronology of official languages policy in Canada — Official bilingualism dates back, in various forms, to Canadian Confederation in 1867. However, for many years English occupied a de facto privileged position, and French was not fully equal. The two languages have gradually achieved a greater… …   Wikipedia

  • Minority language — A minority language is a language spoken by a minority of the population of a territory. Such people are termed linguistic minorities or language minorities. Contents 1 International politics 2 Definition in international law 3 Controversy …   Wikipedia

  • Section Twenty-three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — is the section of the Charter that constitutionally guarantees minority language educational rights to French speaking communities outside Quebec, and, to a lesser extent, English speaking minorities in Quebec. The section may be particularly… …   Wikipedia

  • List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (by author) — The following is a list of notable decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada sorted by author.Understanding what cases were authored by whom can be important. For example, in early interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it… …   Wikipedia

  • Adler v. Ontario — SCCInfoBox case name=Adler v. Ontario full case name=Susie Adler, Mark Grossman, Paula Kezwer, Marcy Rapp and Riky Young v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Ontario, the Minister of Education and the Minister of Health; Leo Elgersma, Harry Pott …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”