Child Online Protection Act

Child Online Protection Act

The Child Online Protection Act[1] (COPA)[2] was a law in the United States of America, passed in 1998 with the declared purpose of restricting access by minors to any material defined as harmful to such minors on the Internet. The law, however, never took effect, as three separate rounds of litigation led to a permanent injunction against the law in 2009.

The law was part of a series of efforts by US lawmakers legislating over Internet pornography. Parts of the earlier and much broader Communications Decency Act had been struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1997 (Reno v. ACLU); COPA was a direct response to that decision, narrowing the range of material covered. COPA only limits commercial speech and only affects providers based within the United States.

COPA required all commercial distributors of "material harmful to minors" to restrict their sites from access by minors. "Material harmful to minors" was defined as material that by "contemporary community standards" was judged to appeal to the "prurient interest" and that showed sexual acts or nudity (including female breasts). This is a much broader standard than obscenity.

Litigation history

The federal government was enjoined from enforcing COPA by a court order in 1998. In 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the injunction and struck down the law, ruling that it was too broad in using "community standards" as part of the definition of harmful materials. In May 2002, the Supreme Court reviewed this ruling, found the given reason insufficient and returned the case to the Circuit Court; the law remained blocked. On March 6, 2003, the 3rd Circuit Court again struck down the law as unconstitutional, this time finding that it would hinder protected speech among adults. The government again sought review in the Supreme Court.[3]

On June 29, 2004, in Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),[4] the Supreme Court upheld the injunction on enforcement, ruling that the law was likely to be unconstitutional. Notably, the court mentioned that "filtering’s superiority to COPA is confirmed by the explicit findings of the Commission on Child Online Protection, which Congress created to evaluate the relative merits of different means of restricting minors' ability to gain access to harmful materials on the internet." The court also wrote that it was five years since the district court had considered the effectiveness of filtering software and that two less-restrictive laws had been passed since COPA, one prohibiting misleading domain names and another creating a child-safe .kids domain, and that given the rapid pace of internet development those might be sufficient to restrict access by minors to specific material. The court referred the case back to the district court for a trial, which began on October 25, 2006.

In preparation for that trial, the Department of Justice issued subpoenas to various search engines to obtain Web addresses and records of searches as one part of a study undertaken by a witness in support of the law. The search engines turned over the requested information, except for Google, which challenged the subpoenas. The court limited the subpoena to a sample of URLs in Google's database, but declined to enforce the request for searches conducted by users; Google then complied.[5][6]

On March 22, 2007, U.S. District Judge Lowell A. Reed, Jr. once again struck down the Child Online Protection Act,[7] finding the law facially in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution. In addition to the plaintiffs ACLU et al., several witnesses testified in defense of first amendment rights on the Internet, including the director of the Erotic Authors Association, Marilyn Jaye Lewis.[8] Reed issued an order permanently enjoining the government from enforcing COPA, commenting that "perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections, which they will with age inherit fully, are chipped away in the name of their protection."[9] The government again appealed, and the case was heard before the Third Circuit.[10]

On July 22, 2008, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the 2007 decision.[11][12]

On January 21, 2009, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear appeals of the lower court decision, effectively killing the bill.[13][14]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "47 U.S.C. 231". law.cornell.edu. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000231----000-.html. Retrieved July 11, 2006. 
  2. ^ COPA is sometimes confused with COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which remains in force and limits the ability of sites to offer services to those aged twelve and under without explicit parental consent.
  3. ^ "Ashcroft v. ACLU - The Legal Challenge to the Child Online Protection Act". Electronic Privacy Information Center. http://www.epic.org/free_speech/copa/. Retrieved January 19, 2006. 
  4. ^ "Supreme Court of the United States: Ashcroft v. ACLU (2004)". law.cornell.edu. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-218.ZS.html. Retrieved March 30, 2006. 
  5. ^ "Google blog". http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/judge-tells-doj-no-on-search-queries.html. 
  6. ^ "Ruling on Google subpoena" (PDF). http://www.google.com/press/images/ruling_20060317.pdf. 
  7. ^ "US District Court Final Adjudication" (PDF). http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/07D0346P.pdf. 
  8. ^ "US District Court Transcripts". http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/internet/27171res20061023.html. 
  9. ^ "Judge Strikes '98 Law Aimed At Online Porn". Associated Press. http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_5494735. Retrieved March 22, 2007. 
  10. ^ Lamut, Anna (3 August 2008). "ACLU v. Mukasey; Third Circuit Holds Child Online Protection Act Unconstitutional". Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/uncategorized/aclu-v-mukasey. Retrieved 24 January 2009. 
  11. ^ "Net Censorship Law Struck Down Again". http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/net-censorship.html. Retrieved July 22, 2008. 
  12. ^ ACLU v. Mukasey, 3rd Cir., 22 July 2008.
  13. ^ Sherman, Mark (21 January 2009). "Anti-Porn Online Law Dies Quietly in Supreme Court". AP (Yahoo! News). http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_internet_blocking. Retrieved 24 January 2009. [dead link]
  14. ^ Nichols, Scott (22 January 2009). "COPA Child-Porn Law Killed". PC World. http://www.pcworld.com/article/158131/copa_childporn_law_killed.html. Retrieved 24 January 2009. 

References

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Child Online Protection Act — Le Child Online Protection Act est une loi fédérale américaine destinée à protéger les mineurs des expositions pornographiques sur Internet. Elle fait suite à l invalidation par la Cour suprême du Communications Decency Act, une loi plus ancienne …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Firearm Owners Protection Act — The Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA), Pub. L. No. 99 308, 100 Stat. 449 (May 19, 1986), codified at usc|18|921 et seq., is a United States federal law that revised many statutes in the Gun Control Act of 1968.Federal Firearms License… …   Wikipedia

  • Children's Internet Protection Act — The Children s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) requires that K 12 schools and libraries in the United States use Internet filters and implement other measures to protect children from harmful online content as a condition for the receipt of… …   Wikipedia

  • Children's Online Privacy Protection Act — Not to be confused with the Child Online Protection Act, abbreviated COPA . The Children s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) is a United States federal law, located at 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506 (Pub.L. 105 277,… …   Wikipedia

  • Deleting Online Predators Act of 2006 — H.R. 5319 redirects here. For the star (HD 124454), see List of stars in Centaurus. The Deleting Online Predators Act of 2006[1] (DOPA) is a bill (H.R. 5319) brought before the United States House of Representatives on May 9, 2006 by Republican… …   Wikipedia

  • Children's Online Privacy Protection Act — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Coppa (homonymie). Le Children s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) est une loi des États Unis 1998 visant à protéger la vie privée des enfants sur Internet. Cette loi concerne la collecte, par des personnes… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • No Child Left Behind Act — President Bush signing the bipartisan No Child Left Behind Act at Hamilton H.S. in Hamilton, Ohio. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 …   Wikipedia

  • Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 — (COPPA) USA A federal law enforced by the Federal Trade Commission that regulates the online collection of personal information from children under the age of 13. It applies to commercial websites and online services that either …   Law dictionary

  • Uniform Parental Rights Enforcement and Protection Act — The Uniform Parental Rights, Enforcement and Protection Act (UPREPA) was developed in September 2000 as a petition to the United States, and to several of the individual states. It is founded upon the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment …   Wikipedia

  • Child protection (disambiguation) — On Wikipedia, Child protection may refer to Wikipedia:Child protection. Child protection or youth protection may refer to: Child protection Aboriginal child protection Laws Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, a 2006 United States law that …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”