- England Your England
"England Your England" is an
essay written by the Britishauthor George Orwell duringThe Blitz of 1941 asbomber s ofNazi Germany flew overhead. It is his attempt to define Britishculture and the British people for the rest of the world as he fears that it might soon be wiped from earth by the Nazi armies. He also states that England will not change into afascist state and cannot unless she is thoroughly broken.Orwell also describes England as one of the most democratic nations on the earth at the time, but that it lacked a true and correct worldview and replaced it with a level of fervent
patriotism . He exemplifies this with reference to the fact that Englishgentry and businessmen thought Fascism was a system that was compatible with the English economy. The gentry believed that simply becauseMussolini andHitler were staunchly opposed tocommunism that their views were "England-friendly" and thus they cheered whenever Mussolini's bombers would sink a ship ferrying supplies to support more centrist groups. It was not until the election came around and they realized that Franco's accession would be a severe blow to England. Thus they realized that Fascism is bad for England due to its revolutionary origins or heavily military-dependent system of policing and control. Orwell himself, however, admits that Fascism is a better system for the wealthy, unless you were aJew , than Communism or Socialist Democracy.Orwell argues that Britain, although divided between many nationalities such as Scots, Welshmen, English, etc..., everyone considers themselves British as soon as a need to defend their land arises. He also theorizes that it might be more appropriate to divide Britons by financial classes which would result in two, or maybe even three or four, Britains.
Key Quotations
:"As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me.:"They do not feel any enmity against me as an individual, nor I against them. They are 'only doing their duty', as the saying goes. Most of them would never dream of committing murder in private life. On the other hand, if one of them succeeds in blowing me to pieces with a well-placed bomb, he will never sleep any the worse for it. He is serving his country, which has the power to absolve him from evil.":"One gets a better view of this question if one considers the minor point first. It is quite true that the so-called races of Britain feel themselves to be very different from one another. A Scotsman, for instance, does not thank you if you call him an Englishman. You can see the hesitation we feel on this point by the fact that we call our islands by no less than six different names, England, Britain, Great Britain, the British Isles, the United Kingdom and, in very exalted moments,
Albion . Even the differences between north and south England loom large in our own eyes. But somehow these differences fade away the moment that any two Britons are confronted by aEurope an. It is very rare to meet a foreigner, other than an American, who can distinguish between English and Scots or even English and Irish. To a Frenchman, the Breton and theAuvergnat seem very different beings, and the accent ofMarseilles is a stock joke inParis . Yet we speak of ‘France ’ and ‘the French’, recognizing France as an entity, a single civilization, which in fact it is. So also with ourselves. Looked at from the outsider even thecockney and theYorkshire man have a strong family resemblance.":"And even the distinction between rich and poor dwindles somewhat when one regards the nation from the outside. There is no question about the inequality of wealth in England. It is grosser than in any European country, and you have only to look down the nearest street to see it. Economically, England is certainly two nations, if not three or four. But at the same time the vast majority of the people feel themselves to be a single nation and are conscious of resembling one another more than they resemble foreigners. Patriotism is usually stronger than class-hatred, and always stronger than any kind of internationalism. Except for a brief moment in 1920 (the ‘Hands offRussia ’ movement) the British working class have never thought or acted internationally. For two and a half years they watched their comrades in Spain slowly strangled, and never aided them by even a single strike. But when their own country (the country of Lord Nuffield and MrMontagu Norman ) was in danger, their attitude was very different. At the moment when it seemed likely that England might be invaded,Anthony Eden appealed over the radio forLocal Defence Volunteers . He got a quarter of a million men in the first twenty-four hours, and another million in the subsequent month. One has only to compare these figures with, for instance, the number of conscientious objectors to see how vast is the strength of traditional loyalties compared with new ones.":"The intellectuals who hope to see it Russianised or Germanised will be disappointed. The gentleness, thehypocrisy , the thoughtlessness, the reverence for law and the hatred of uniforms will remain, along with thesuet pudding s and the misty skies. It needs some very great disaster, such as prolonged subjugation by a foreign enemy, to destroy a national culture. TheStock Exchange will be pulled down, the horse plough will give way to the tractor, the country houses will be turned into children's holiday camps, the Eton and Harrow match will be forgotten, but England will still be England, an everlasting animal stretching into the future and the past, and, like all living things, having the power to change out of recognition and yet remain the same."ee also
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
]External links
* [http://whitewolf.newcastle.edu.au/words/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/essay/England/england.html Online text]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.