Kelly-Hopkinsville encounter

The Kelly-Hopkinsville encounter, also known as the Hopkinsville Goblins case, is a well-known and well-documented alleged Close Encounter event in the history of UFO incidents. The event occurred near the towns of Kelly and Hopkinsville, Kentucky beginning on the evening of August 21, 1955 and continuing through the next morning. UFO researcher Allan Hendry wrote " [t] his case is distinguished by its duration and also by the number of witnesses involved."cite book
last=Hendry
first=Allan
title=The Encyclopedia of UFOs
publisher= Doubleday & Company, Inc.
location= Garden City
pages= 190-192
year= 1980
isbn= 0-385-13677-3
editor= Ronald Story
url=http://www.nicap.org/kelly-hendry.htm]

Multiple eyewitnesses would claim that, for several hours stretching over a late evening and early morning, they repeatedly saw five glowing, silvery creatures, each three feet tall and seeming to float above the ground. The witnesses additionally claimed to have used firearms to shoot at the creatures, with little or no effect.

Jerome Clark writes that " [i] nvestigations by police, Air Force officers, and civilian ufologists found no evidence of a hoax. Even Blue Book confessed to being stumped. So was [Isabel] Davis, one of the most hardheaded of UFO investigators."cite book
last=Clark
first=Jerome
title=Unexplained! 347 Strange Sightings, Incredible Occurrences, and Puzzling Physical Phenomena
publisher= Visible Ink Press
location= Detroit
year= 1993
isbn= 0-8103-9436-7 ] It should be noted, however, that Project Blue Book never formally investigated the case.

The Event

On the evening of August 21, 1955, members of the Sutton family were entertaining a visiting friend, Billy Ray Taylor, at their farm house located near the towns of Kelly and Hopkinsville, Kentucky.

When Taylor went to an outside water pump for a drink at about 7.00 p.m., he observed strange lights in the sky to the west. He excitedly told the others about his "flying saucer" sighting, but no one believed him, instead thinking that he had become overly excited after seeing a vivid "shooting star".

At about 8.00 p.m., the family dog began barking loudly, and then hid under the house, where it stayed for the entire event. Going outside a few minutes later, Billy Ray Taylor and Elmer "Lucky" Sutton then asserted that they saw a strange creature emerge from the nearby trees. Jerome Clark describes the creature as:

:a luminous, three-and-a-half-foot-tall being with an oversized head, big, floppy, pointed ears, glowing eyes, and hands with talons at their ends. The figure, either made of or simply dressed in silvery metal, had its hands raised.

When the creature approached to within about 20 feet of the Taylor home, the men began shooting at it, one using a shotgun, the other man using a .22 rifle. The creature, they said, then flipped over and fled into the darkness. Sure that they had wounded the creature, Lucky and Billy Ray went out to look for it. Hendry writes that as the men were stepping from the porch, "a taloned hand reached and touched his hair from above." They shot at the creature -- it was perched on an awning over the porch -- and it was knocked from the roof.

Within minutes, Lucky's brother J.C. Sutton said that he saw the same (or a similar creature) peer into a window in the home; J.C. and Billy Ray shot at it, whereupon it too flipped over and fled.

For the next few hours, the witnesses would assert that the creatures repeatedly approached the home, only to be shot at each time they did. One time, the witnesses shot one of the beings nearly point blank, and would later insist that the sound resembled bullets striking a metal bucket. The floating creatures' legs seemed to be atrophied and nearly useless, and they appeared to propel themselves with a curious hip-swaying motion, steering with their arms. Clark writes that " [i] f the creatures were in a tree or on the roof when hit [by gunfire] , they would float, not fall, to the ground."

Hendry writes that family matriarch "Mrs. Lankford … counseled an end to the hostilities," noting that the creatures had never seemed to try harming anyone. Between appearances from the creatures, the family tried to temper the children's growing hysteria.

At about 11.00 p.m., the Taylor-Sutton crew decided to flee their home in automobiles; after about 30 minutes they arrived at the Hopkinsville police station. Police Chief Russell Greenwell judged the witnesses to have been frightened by something "beyond reason, not ordinary." He also opined " [t] hese were not the sort of people who normally ran to the police … something frightened them, something beyond their comprehension." A police officer with medical training determined that Billy Ray's pulse rate was more than twice normal.

There might have been partial corroboration of the Taylor-Sutton tale: at about 11 p.m., a state highway trooper near Kelly independently reported some unusual "meteors" flying overhead "with a sound like artillery fire."

Several police officers accompanied the Taylor-Suttons back to their home, and according to Daniels et al, " [t] he official response was prompt and thorough."cite book
editor= Sarah Schneiman and Pat Daniels
title= Mysteries of the Unknown: The UFO Phenomenon
publisher= Time Life Books
year= 1987
pages= 65
isbn= 0-8094-6324-5 ] In 1998, Karal Ayn Barnett wrote, "By all accounts, the witnesses were deemed sane, not under the influence [of drugs or alcohol] , and in such a state of terror, no one involved doubted that they had seen something beyond far their ken."cite web
url= http://ufologie.net/htm/kelly55.htm
title= The Kelly-Hopkinsville Case, 1955
accessdate=2007-04-16
year= 2005
publisher= UFOs at Close Sight
language= en]

Police and photographers who visited the home saw many bullet holes and spent shells, and further discovered what Clark describes as "an odd luminous patch along a fence where one of the beings had been shot, and, in the woods beyond, a green light whose source could not be determined." Though the investigation was inconclusive, Daniels et al. writes, "Investigators did conclude, however, that these people were sincere and sane and that they had no interest in exploiting the case for publicity.The patch sample was never collected. "

Police left at about 2:15 a.m., and not long afterwards, the witnesses claimed that the creatures returned. Billy Ray fired at them once more, ruining a window. The last of the creatures was allegedly sighted at about 4:45 a.m. on August 22.

Aftermath

The case earned publicity within hours of its alleged occurrence. The August 22, 1955 "Kentucky New Era" claimed that "12 to 15 little men" had been seen. Clark writes that none of the witnesses ever claimed this, rather that " [t] he observers had no idea how many of the creatures there were. They could only be certain that there were at least two because they saw that number at the same time."

Later on the 22nd, Andrew "Bud" Ledwith of WHOP radio interviewed the seven adult witnesses in two different groups. He judged their tale of the events as consistent, especially in their descriptions of the strange glowing beings. Ledwith had worked as a professional artist, and sketched the creatures based on the witnesses descriptions. Their descriptions were generally consistent, though the female witnesses insisted that the creatures had a somewhat husker build than the male witnesses remembered, and Billy Ray Taylor was alone in insisting that the beings had antennae. Hendry describes Ledwith's efforts as "fortunate … because the publicity soon grew so obnoxious to that Sutton family that they later simply avoided telling the story and refused to cooperate [with UFO investigators, excepting] Isabel Davis."

As reports reached the newspapers, public opinion tended to view the story as a hoax and showed only brief interest in the event. Some residents of the local community, including members of the police department, were skeptical of the Sutton's story and believed that alcohol (possibly moonshine) may have played a part in the incident, although to date no evidence has been found to support this belief. The fact that some of the witnesses worked for a carnival somehow contributed to the belief in a hoax.

The farm became a tourist attraction for a brief period, which upset the Suttons who tried to keep people away, eventually attempting to charge people an entrance fee to discourage them. That only convinced the sight-seers that the family was attempting to make money from the event, and increased the public view that the event was a hoax. Finally, the Suttons refused all visitors and refused to discuss the event further with anyone. To date, family members who survived the event rarely talk to reporters or researchers, and by given accounts have stuck to their version of the event. As late as 2002, Lucky Sutton's daughter, Geraldine Hawkins, believed her father's account, stating,

:It was a serious thing to him. It happened to him. He said it happened to him. He said it wasn't funny. It was an experience he said he would never forget. It was fresh in his mind until the day he died. It was fresh in his mind like it happened yesterday. He never cracked a smile when he told the story because it happened to him and there wasn't nothing funny about it. He got pale and you could see it in his eyes. He was scared to death." [cite web
url= http://www.ufoevidence.org/Cases/CaseSubarticle.asp?ID=533
title= Children of witness defend father's 1955 claim
accessdate=2007-04-16
last= Carlton
first= Michele
year= 2002
publisher= Ufo Evidence
language= en]

The official UFO investigation office, Project Blue Book, never officially investigated the case, although a file has been kept on it. A prominent Ufologist Allen Hynek had interviews with two persons with direct knowledge of the event a year after the event took place.

Artist's Rendition of the Alleged Invaders

In addition to Ledwith's sketches, Pfc. Gary F. Hodson of the 101st Airborne Division stationed at nearby Fort Campbell sketched the creatures based on eyewitness descriptions. The "men" were described as approximately 3 feet tall and either being silver in color or wearing silver colored clothing that lit up or glowed when the invaders shouted to each other. All of the witnesses agreed to a remarkable degree as to the appearance of the creatures.

It is also worth noting that the descriptions of these creatures (which by no means fit the common impressions of extraterrestrials) closely fit the accounts of 15 children and 3 school staff in Dyfed (West Wales) later in 1977, who observed small 'silvery men with spiked ears' and helmets working around a UFO. [ [http://www.a-galaxy-of-stars.co.uk/index.php?name=Sections&req=viewarticle&artid=137&allpages=1&theme=Printer The Case Of The Welsh Triangle UFO Fl
] ]

The picture on the right also contains a rendition of the craft that was observed prior to the gun battle. However, this was only seen flashing across the sky and was initially thought to be a meteor.

Explanations

* In 1957, U.S. Air Force Major John E. Albert concluded that the Kelly-Hopkinsville case was the result of the witnesses seeing a "monkey painted with silver [that] escaped from a circus," and that Mrs. Lankford's imagination had exaggerated the event. Isabel Davis, for one, rejected this explanation as not only entirely speculative, but absurd: " [m] onkeys are hairy creatures, monkeys have long tails, monkeys are notorious chatterboxes, and monkeys struck by bullets bleed and die ... no amount of 'optical illusion' can explain a mistake of this magnitude."
* An explanation for the case has been proposed recently by Renaud Leclet, a French Ufologist. It could be a misidentification of a pair of Great horned owls, which are nocturnal, fly silently, have yellow eyes, and aggressively defend their nests. Leclet argues that this explanation fits well with the details of the case, including the appearance and behaviour of the "humanoids". The metallic sound of the striking bullets can be explained by the fact that some bullets hit some metallic objects of the farm, such as the fence. [cite web
url= http://francine.cordier.club.fr/pages/souspagekelly3eng.htm
title= What Is the Real Nature of the Kelly-Hopkinsville Entities?
first= Renaud
last= Leclet
accessdate=2007-04-16
year= 2005
language= en] This misidentified bird hypothesis was echoed by Joe Nickell in a Skeptical Inquirer article. [cite journal
last = Nickell
first = Joe
year = 2006
title = Siege of 'Little Green Men': The 1955 Kelly, Kentucky, Incident
journal = Sceptical Inquirer
issue = 6
url = http://www.csicop.org/si/2006-06/i-files.html
language = en]

References

External links

* [http://ufologie.net/htm/kelly55.htm Close Encounters: The Kelly-Hopkinsville Case] - English/French language UFO website.
* [http://ufocasebook.com/Kelly-Hopkinsville.html Kelly-Hopkinsville Encounter] - UFO Casebook website.