- Open source license
An open source license is a copyright
license forcomputer software that makes the source code available under terms that allow for modification and redistribution without having to pay the original author. Such licenses may have additional restrictions such as a requirement to preserve the name of the authors and the copyright statement within the code. One popular (and sometimes considered normative) set ofopen source software licenses are those approved by theOpen Source Initiative (OSI) based on theirOpen Source Definition (OSD).Comparisons
The
Free Software Foundation has related but distinct criteria for evaluating whether or not a license qualifies a program asfree software . All licenses qualified as free software are also considered open source licenses. Likewise, theDebian project has its own criteria, theDebian Free Software Guidelines , on which the Open Source Definition is based.There are also
shared source licenses which have some similarities with open source, such as the Microsoft Reference License (MS-RL), but are not compatible with the Open Source Definition.OSI approved licenses
:
The categories were created by a
license proliferation committee in 2006 to lessen or remove issues caused by license proliferation [ [http://www.opensource.org/proliferation-report Report of License Proliferation Committee and draft FAQ] ] .Licenses that are popular and widely used or with strong communities (11)
*
Affero General Public License (AGPL)
*Apache Software License 2.0
* newBSD License
*Common Development and Distribution License
*Common Public License 1.0
*Eclipse Public License
*GNU General Public License (GPL)
*GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
*ISC license
*MIT License
*Mozilla Public License (MPL) 1.1Special purpose licenses (3)
*
Educational Community License
*NASA Open Source Agreement
*Open Group Test Suite License Other/Miscellaneous licenses (7)
*
Adaptive Public License (APL)
*Artistic License
*Microsoft Public License
*Microsoft Reciprocal License
*Open Software License
*Q Public License (QPL)
*zlib-libpng license Licenses that are redundant with more popular licenses (8)
*
Academic Free License
*Attribution Assurance Licenses
*Eiffel Forum License 2
*Fair License
*Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer
*Lucent Public License 1.02
*University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License
*X.Net License Non-reusable licenses (25)
*
Apple Public Source License
*Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License
*CUA Office Public License
*Entessa Public License
*EU DataGrid Software License
*Frameworx License
*IBM Public License
*Motosoto License
*Naumen Public License
*NetHack General Public License
*Nokia Open Source License
*OCLC Research Public License 2.0
*PHP License
*Python License (CNRI Python License)
*Python Software Foundation License
*RealNetworks Public Source License
*Reciprocal Public License
*Ricoh Source Code Public License
*Sleepycat License
*Sun Public License (SPL)
*Sybase Open Watcom Public License
*Vovida Software License v. 1.0
*W3C License
*wxWindows Library License
*Zope Public License Superseded licenses (4)
*
Apache Software License 1.1
*Eiffel Forum License 1
*Lucent Public License Plan9
*Mozilla Public License (MPL) 1.0Licenses that have been voluntarily retired (4)
*MITRE Collaborative Virtual Workspace License (CVW License)
*Intel Open Source License
*Jabber Open Source License
*Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL)Not categorized
*
Common Public Attribution License Non-OSI source licenses
Licenses that are source-available but not OSI-Certified include:
*HESSLA
*Lemur License Agreement
*MAME (source available, but not free software because it forbids commercial use and redistribution)
*PGP
*Ruby License (Ruby is open-source, since it is GPL dual-licensed)ee also
*
Comparison of free software licences
*Beerware
*Dual licensing
*Free software license
*Free Software Foundation
*Jacobsen v. Katzer -- U.S. ruling upholding the enforceability of open source licenses
*Open Source Initiative
*Software license References
External links
* [http://www.opensource.org/ The Open Source Initiative]
* [http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/21/0239245 Open Source Licensing] — a review and discussion of Lawrence Rosen's book "Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law" (ISBN 0-13-148787-6) onslashdot
* [http://pgl.yoyo.org/lqr/ Open Source License Quick Reference Chart] — a chart comparing various aspects of Open Source licenses, with the option to select your bias. Based on Zooko's document, [http://zooko.com/license_quick_ref.html Open Source Reference for Choosing a Free Software License] .
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031231092027900 Understanding Open Source Software - by Red Hat's Mark Webbink, Esq.] — an excellent overview of copyright and open source.
*Discussion " [http://visordown.com/forums/showthread.php?t=190360 Open Source/Free Software v Commercial Licence Software] "
* [http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ict/policy/doc/2006-11-20-flossimpact.pdf EU report in favor of adopting open source software]
* [http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/default.mspx Shared Source Licenses]Wikibooks
*
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.