- Deep operations
Deep operations was a military doctrine developed by the
Soviet Union for its armed forces during the 1920s and 1930s. It was fully developed with the 1936 Field Regulations.History
During the 1920s and 1930s, Soviet military theorists introduced the concept of deep battle. Habeck, Mary, "Storm of Steel: The Development of Armor Doctrine in Germany and the Soviet Union, 1919–1939", Cornell University Press, 2003, ISBN 0-8014-4074-2. Relevant pages available from
Google Book Search : [http://books.google.ca/books?vid=ISBN0801440742&id=bb0jAKufxNUC&pg=PP22&lpg=PP22&q=deep+battle&vq=deep+battle&dq=%22deep+battle%22&sig=1OGkPWWcOpNV15lyZULeWNDt54U] .] It was a direct consequence from the experience with wide, sweeping movements of cavalry formations during theRussian Civil War and thePolish-Soviet War .Content
cope
Deep Operations encompassed maneuver by multiple
corps - orarmy sized formations simultaneously. It was not meant to deliver a victory in a single operation, but rather multiple operations conducted in parallel or successively were meant to guarantee victory. In this, Deep Operations differed from the usual interpretation of theBlitzkrieg doctrine.Aim
The objective of Deep Operations was to attack the enemy simultaneously throughout the depth of his ground force to induce a catastrophic failure in his defensive system. Highly mobile formations would then exploit this failure by breaking into the deep rear of the enemy and destroying his ability to rebuild his defenses.
The first-echelon, acted the first layer of forces in deep operations. These forces would be arrayed along the front immediately opposite the enemy. In the outbreak of conflict, first-echelon forces would come into immediate contact with opposing forces.
Second-echelon forces provide a supporting role.The role of technology
Soviet deep-battle theory was driven by technological advances and the hope that
maneuver warfare offered opportunities for quick, efficient, and decisive victory. The concurrent development of aviation and armor provided a physical impetus for this doctrinal evolution within theRed Army . MarshalMikhail Tukhachevsky stated that airpower should be "employed against targets beyond the range ofinfantry ,artillery , and other arms. For maximum tactical effect aircraft should be employed in mass, concentrated in time and space, against targets of the highest tactical importance."Deep Operations in theory and practice
Field Regulations
Deep Operations were first formally expressed as a concept in the Red Army's "Field Regulations" of 1929, and more fully developed in the 1935 "Instructions on Deep Battle". The concept was finally codified by the army in 1936 in the "Provisional Field Regulations" of 1936.
The impact of the purges
The
Great Purges of 1937–1939 removed many of the leading officers of the Red Army, including Tukhachevsky. As a consequence, and as a result of experiences from theSpanish Civil War and theWinter War againstFinland , the concept of Deep Operations was abandoned, until its potential was shown again during the rapid German victory over France in Operation Yellow in 1940. An early example of the potential effectiveness of deep operations can be found in the Soviet victory overJapan at the Battle of Khalkhin Gol (Nomonhan), where a Soviet corps under the command of Tukhachevsky's disciple G. K. Zhukov defeated a substantial Japanese force in August–September, 1939.Deep Operations during World War II
The development of Soviet operational doctrine during
World War II owes a lot to the sound doctrinal base that was present in the 1936 Field Regulations, and the ideas of Deep Operations. The rapid growth of a competent mechanised force, as well as its adept handling, were remarked on by German officers such as F.W. von Mellenthin. The two military operations that came closest to the ideal of Deep Operations were probably theVistula-Oder Offensive against theWehrmacht in January/February 1945, and theOperation August Storm against the JapaneseKwantung Army inManchuria in August 1945. Both were rapid and crushing victories for the Red Army.Major proponents
*
Mikhail Tukhachevsky
*Lev Kamenev
*Georgii Isserson
*Pavel Varfolomeev
*Vladimir Triandafillov ee also
*
Operational art
*Tank Corps (Soviet)
*Mechanized Corps (Soviet) References
Notes
Sources
* United States War Department. "Handbook on U.S.S.R. Military Forces", War Department Technical Manual TM30-430. November 1945.
* Garthoff, Raymond L. "Soviet Military Doctrine". Santa Monica, California:RAND Corp., 1953.
* Simpkin, Richard. "Deep battle: The Brainchild of Marshal Tukhachevskii". London; Washington: Brassey’s Defence, 1987. ISBN 0080311938.
* Glantz, David M., Col (rtd.) "Soviet military operational art: in pursuit of deep battle", Frank Cass, London, 1991 ISBN 0-7146-4077-8
* Harrison, Richard W. "The Russian Way of War: Operational Art 1904–1940". Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, 2001. ISBN 070061074X.External links
* [http://www.redarmystudies.net/0411030.htm Red Army Studies]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.