Gryposaurus

Taxobox|

---

image_width = 220px
name = "Gryposaurus"
regnum = Animalia
phylum = Chordata
classis = Sauropsida
superordo = Dinosauria
ordo = Ornithischia
familia = Hadrosauridae
subfamilia = Hadrosaurinae
genus = "Gryposaurus"
genus_authority = Lambe, 1914
subdivision_ranks = Species
subdivision =
* "G. notabilis" Lambe, 1914 (type)
* "G. incurvimanus" (Parks, 1920) (originally "Kritosaurus")
* "G. latidens" Horner, 1992
* "G. monumentensis" Gates & Sampson, 2007
synonyms =
* "Hadrosauravus" ("nomen nudum") Lambert, 1990

"Gryposaurus" (meaning "hooked-nosed (Greek "grypos") lizard";cite book |last=Creisler |first=Benjamin S. |year=2007 |chapter=Deciphering duckbills |editor=Carpenter, Kenneth (ed.) |title=Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington and Indianapolis |pages=185-210 |isbn=0-253-34817-X] sometimes incorrectly translated as "griffin (Latin "gryphus") lizard"cite book|chapter=Gryposaurus |last=Glut |first=Donald F. |authorlink=Donald F. Glut |title=Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia |year=1997 |publisher=McFarland & Co |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |pages=445-448 |isbn=0-89950-917-7] ) was a genus of duckbilled dinosaur that lived about 83 to 75 million years ago, in the Late Cretaceous (late Santonian to late Campanian stages) of North America. Named species of "Gryposaurus" are known from the Dinosaur Park Formation in Alberta, Canada, the Lower Two Medicine Formation in Montana, USA, and the Kaiparowits Formation of Utah.

"Gryposaurus" is similar to "Kritosaurus", and for many years was regarded as the same genus. It is known from numerous skulls, some skeletons, and even some skin impressions that show it to have had pyramidal scales pointing out along the midline of the back. It is most easily distinguished from other duckbills by its narrow arching nasal hump, sometimes described as similar to a "Roman nose," and which may have been used for species or sexual identification, and/or combat with individuals of the same species. A large bipedal/quadrupedal herbivore around 9 meters long (30 ft), it may have preferred river settings.

Description

"Gryposaurus" was a hadrosaurid of typical size and shape; one of the best specimens, the nearly complete type specimen of "G. incurvimanus" now on display at the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, came from an animal about 8.2 meters long (27 feet).cite book |last=Lull |first=Richard Swann |authorlink=Richard Swann Lull |coauthors= and Wright, Nelda E. |title=Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America |year=1942 |publisher=Geological Society of America |series=Geological Society of America Special Paper 40 |pages=226 ] This specimen also has the best example of skin impressions for "Gryposaurus", showing this dinosaur to have had several different types of scalation: pyramidal, ridged, limpet-shaped scutes upwards of 3.8 centimeters long (1.5 inches) on the flank and tail; uniform polygonal scales on the neck and sides of the body; and pyramidal structures, flattened side-to-side, with fluted sides, longer than tall and found along the top of the back in a single midline row.cite book |last=Lull |first=Richard Swann |authorlink=Richard Swann Lull |coauthors= and Wright, Nelda E. |title=Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America |year=1942 |publisher=Geological Society of America |series=Geological Society of America Special Paper 40 |pages=110-117]

The four named species of "Gryposaurus" differ in details of the skull and lower jaw. The prominent nasal arch found in this genus is formed from the paired nasal bones. In profile view, they rise into a rounded hump in front of the eyes, reaching a height as tall as the highest point of the back of the skull.cite journal |last=Lambe |first=Lawrence M. |authorlink=Lawrence Lambe |year=1914 |title=On "Gryposaurus notabilis", a new genus and species of trachodont dinosaur from the Belly River Formation of Alberta, with a description of the skull of "Chasmosaurus belli" |journal=The Ottawa Naturalist |volume=27 |issue=11 |pages=145–155 ] The skeleton is known in great detail,cite journal |last=Parks |first=William A. |authorlink=William Parks |year=1920 |title=The osteology of the trachodont dinosaur "Kritosaurus incurvimanus" |journal=University of Toronto Studies, Geology Series |volume=11 |pages=1–76] making it a useful point of reference for other duckbill skeletons.

Classification

"Gryposaurus" was a hadrosaurine hadrosaurid, a member of the duckbill subfamily without hollow head crests.cite book |last=Horner |first=John R. |authorlink=Jack Horner (paleontologist) |coauthors=Weishampel, David B.; and Forster, Catherine A |editor=Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; and Osmólska, Halszka (eds.)|title=The Dinosauria |edition=2nd |year= 2004|publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=0-520-24209-2 |pages=438-463 |chapter=Hadrosauridae ] The general term "gryposaur" is sometimes used for duckbills with arched nasals,cite book |last=Weishampel |first=David B. |authorlink=David B. Weishampel |coauthors=and Horner, Jack R. |editor= Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; and Osmólska, Halszka (eds.)|title=The Dinosauria |edition=1st |year=1990 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=0-520-06727-4 |pages=534-561 |chapter=Hadrosauridae] such as "Kritosaurus" "australis" and "Antonio", an undescribed hadrosaurine from Trieste, Italy.cite book |last=Glut |first=Donald F. |authorlink=Donald F. Glut |title=Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia |year=2002 |publisher=McFarland & Co |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |volume=Supplement 2 |pages=79-80 |isbn=0-89950-917-7] A subfamily, Gryposaurinae, was coined by Jack Horner for it as part of a larger revision that promoted Hadrosaurinae to family status,cite journal |last=Horner |first=John R. |authorlink=Jack Horner (paleontologist) |year=1992 |title=Cranial morphology of "Prosaurolophus" (Ornithischia: Hadrosauridae) with descriptions of two new hadrosaurid species and an evaluation of hadrosaurid phylogenetic relationships |journal=Museum of the Rockies Occasional Paper |volume=2 |pages=1–119 ] but is not in use. The issue of its relationships to other hadrosaurs is equivocal anyway due to the lack of resolution on how it compares to "Kritosaurus". At this time, the main differences between the two are location (Alberta and Montana for "Gryposaurus", New Mexico for "Kritosaurus") and age ("Kritosaurus" comes from slightly younger rocks than "Gryposaurus"). Otherwise, the skull of "Kritosaurus" is incompletely known, lacking most of the bones in front of the eyes, but very similar to that of "Gryposaurus".cite book|title=Late Cretaceous vertebrates from the Western Interior |year=2006 |chapter=Large hadrosaurine dinosaurs from the latest Campanian of Coahuila, Mexico|editor=Lucas, Spencer G.; and Sullivan, Robert M. (eds.) |last=Kirkland |first=James I. |authorlink=James Kirkland (paleontologist) |coauthors=Hernández,-Rivera, René; Gates, Terry; Paul, Gregory S.; Nesbitt, Sterling; Serrano-Brañas, Claudia Inés; and Garcia-de la Garza, Juan Pablo |pages=299-315 |publisher=New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science |series=New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 35 |location=Albuquerque, New Mexico ]

Discovery and history

"Gryposaurus" is based on specimen NMC 2278, a skull and partial skeleton collected in 1913 by George F. Sternberg from what is now known as the Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, along the Red Deer River. This specimen was described and named by Lawrence Lambe shortly thereafter, Lambe drawing attention to its unusual nasal crest. A few years earlier, Barnum Brown had collected and described a partial skull from New Mexico, which he named "Kritosaurus". This skull was missing the snout, which had eroded into fragments; Brown restored it after the duckbill now known as "Anatotitan", which was flat-headed,cite journal |last=Brown |first=Barnum |authorlink=Barnum Brown |year=1910 |title=The Cretaceous Ojo Alamo beds of New Mexico with description of the new dinosaur genus "Kritosaurus" |journal=Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History |volume=28 |issue=24 |pages=267–274 |url=http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/1398 ] and believed that some unusual pieces were evidence of compression. Lambe's description of "Gryposaurus" provided evidence of a different type of head, and by 1916 the "Kritosaurus" skull had been redone with a nasal arch and both Brown and Charles Gilmore had proposed that "Gryposaurus" and "Kritosaurus" were one and the same.cite journal |last=Brown |first=Barnum |authorlink=Barnum Brown |year=1914 |title=Cretaceous Eocene correlation in New Mexico, Wyoming, Montana, Alberta |journal=Geological Society of America Bulletin |volume=33 |pages=355–380 ] cite journal |last=Gilmore |first=Charles W. |authorlink=Charles Whitney Gilmore |year=1916 |title=Contributions to the geology and paleontology of San Juan County, New Mexico. 2. Vertebrate faunas of the Ojo Alamo, Kirtland and Fruitland Formations |journal=United States Geological Survey Professional Paper |volume=98-Q |pages=279–302 ] Although this idea was not fully supported at the time, it was certainly in the air, as shown by William Parks's naming of a nearly complete skeleton from the Dinosaur Park Formation as "Kritosaurus incurvimanus", not "Gryposaurus incurvimanus" (interestingly, he left "Gryposaurus notabilis" alone in its own genus).cite journal |last=Parks |first=William A. |authorlink=William Parks |year=1919 |title=Preliminary description of a new species of trachodont dinosaur of the genus "Kritosaurus", "Kritosaurus incurvimanus" |journal=Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, series 3 |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=51–59 ] Frustratingly, this skeleton is missing the front part of the skull, ending just before the full shape of the nasal arch can be seen. The 1942 publication of the influential Lull and Wright monograph on hadrosaurs sealed the "Kritosaurus"/"Gryposaurus" question for nearly fifty years in favor of "Kritosaurus". Reviews beginning in the 1990s, however, called into question the identity of "Kritosaurus", which has limited material for comparison with other duckbills. Thus, "Gryposaurus" has once again been separated, at least temporarily, from "Kritosaurus".

This situation is made more confusing by old suggestions by some authors, including Jack Horner, that "Hadrosaurus" is also the same as either "Gryposaurus", "Kritosaurus", or both.cite journal |last=Horner |first=John R. |authorlink=Jack Horner (paleontologist) |year=1979 |title=Upper Cretaceous dinosaurs from the Bearpaw Shale (marine) of south-central Montana with a checklist of Upper Cretaceous dinosaur remains from marine sediments in North America |journal=Journal of Paleontology |volume=53 |issue=3 |pages=566–577 ] This hypothesis was most common in the late 1970s-early 1980s, and appears in some popular books;cite book |last=Glut |first=Donald F. |title=The New Dinosaur Dictionary |year=1982 |publisher=Citadel Press |location=Secaucus, NJ |isbn=0-8065-0782-9 |pages=158 ] cite book |last=Lambert |first=David |coauthors=and the Diagram Group |title=A Field Guide to Dinosaurs |year=1983 |publisher=Avon Books |location=New York |isbn=0-380-83519-3 |pages=161 ] one well-known work, "The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs", uses "Kritosaurus" for the Canadian material ("Gryposaurus"), but confusingly identifies the mounted skeleton of "K. incurvimanus" as "Hadrosaurus" in a photo caption.cite book |last=Norman |first=David. B. |authorlink=David B. Norman |title=The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs: An Original and Compelling Insight into Life in the Dinosaur Kingdom |chapter=Hadrosaurids I|year=1985 |publisher=Crescent Books |location=New York |pages=116-121 |isbn=0-517-468905 ] Although Horner in 1979 used the new combination "Hadrosaurus [Kritosaurus] notabilis" for a partial skull and skeleton and a second less-complete skeleton from the Bearpaw Shale of Montana (which have since fallen out of the literature), by 1990 he had changed his position, and was among the first to again use "Gryposaurus" in print. Current thought is that "Hadrosaurus", although known from fragmentary material, can be distinguished from "Gryposaurus" by differences in the upper arm and ilium.cite journal |last=Prieto-Márquez |first=Alberto |coauthors=Weishampel, David B.; and Horner, John R. |year=2006 |title=The dinosaur "Hadrosaurus foulkii", from the Campanian of the East Coast of North America, with a reevaluation of the genus |journal=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica |volume=51 |issue=1 |pages=77–98 |url=http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app51/app51-077.pdf |format=pdf]

Further research has revealed the presence of a third species, "G. latidens", from slightly older rocks in Montana than the classic gryposaur localities of Alberta. Based on two parts of a skeleton collected in 1916 for the American Museum of Natural History,cite book |last=Lull |first=Richard Swann |authorlink=Richard Swann Lull |coauthors= and Wright, Nelda E. |title=Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America |year=1942 |publisher=Geological Society of America |series=Geological Society of America Special Paper 40 |pages=21] "G. latidens" is also known from bonebed material. Horner, who described the specimens, considered to be a less derived species.

New material from the Kaiparowits Formation of Utah, in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, includes a skull and partial skeleton that represent the species "G. monumentensis". Its skull was more robust than that of the other species, and its predentary had enlarged prongs along its upper margin, where the lower jaw's beak was based. This new species greatly expands the geographic range of this genus, and there may be a second, more lightly built species present as well. Multiple gryposaur species are known from the Kaiparowits, from cranial and postcranial remains, and were larger than their northern counterparts.cite journal |last=Gates |first=Terry |coauthors=and Sampson, Scott |year=2006 |title=A new species of "Gryposaurus" (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from the Upper Campanian Kaiparowits Formation of Utah |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=26 |issue=3, Suppl. |pages=65A]

pecies

Four named species are recognized today: "G. notabilis", "G. incurvimanus", "G. latidens", and "G. monumentensis".cite journal |last=Gates |first=Terry A. |coauthors=Sampson, Scott D. |year=2007 |title=A new species of "Gryposaurus" (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from the late Campanian Kaiparowits Formation, southern Utah, USA |journal=Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society |volume=151 |issue=2 |pages=351–376 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00349.x ] Two of them, the type species "G. notabilis" and "G. incurvimanus", are from the same formation, the late Campanian-age Upper Cretaceous Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, Canada. They differ in the size of the nasal arch (larger and closer to the eyes in "G. notabilis") and the form of the upper arm (longer and more robust in "G. incurvimanus"). 10 complete skulls and 12 fragmentary skulls are known for "G. notabilis" along with postcrania, and two skeletons with skulls are known for "G. incurvimanus"; it may just be a variant of "G. notabilis".cite book |last=Ryan |first=Michael J. |coauthors=and Evans, David C. |editors=Currie, Phillip J., and Koppelhus, Eva |title=Dinosaur Provincial Park: A Spectacular Ancient Ecosystem Revealed |chapter=Ornithischian Dinosaurs |year=2005 |publisher=Indiana University Press |location=Bloomington |pages=312-348 |isbn=0-253-34595-2 ] "G. latidens", from the ?late Santonian-early Campanian Lower Two Medicine Formation of Pondera County, Montana, USA, is known from partial skulls and skeletons from several individuals. Its nasal arch is prominent like that of "G. notabilis", but farther forward on the snout, and its teeth are less derived, reflecting iguanodont-like characteristics. The informal name "Hadrosauravus" (Lambert, 1990)cite book |last=Lambert |first=David |coauthors=and the Diagram Group |title=The Dinosaur Data Book |year=1990 |publisher=Avon Books |location=New York |isbn=0-380-75896-3 |pages=64] is an early, unused name for this species.cite web |url=http://dml.cmnh.org/1999Nov/msg00523.html |title=Re: What are these dinosaurs? |accessdate=2007-05-22 |last=Olshevsky |first=George |authorlink=George Olshevsky |date=1999-11-16 ] "G. monumentensis" is known from a skull and partial skeleton from Utah.

Scrappy remains from Alberta originally named "Trachodon" ("Pteropelyx") "marginatus" (Lambe, 1902)cite journal |last=Lambe |first=Lawrence M. |authorlink=Lawrence Lambe |year=1902 |title=On Vertebrata of the mid-Cretaceous of the Northwest Territory. 2. New genera and species from the Belly River Series (mid-Cretaceous) |journal=Contributions to Canadian Paleontology |volume=3 |pages=25–81 ] were sometimes included with "Kritosaurus" under the "Kritosaurus"="Gryposaurus" hypothesis.cite journal |last=Gilmore |first=Charles W. |authorlink=Charles Whitney Gilmore |year=1924 |title=On the genus "Stephanosaurus", with a description of the type specimen of "Lambeosaurus lambei", Parks |journal=Canada Department of Mines Geological Survey Bulletin (Geological Series) |volume=38 |issue=43 |pages=29–48] This taxon may be the same as "G. notabilis", but this synonymy was not supported in the latest review.

"G. monumentensis" was listed second on the top 10 list of new species in 2008 by the International Institute for Species Exploration. [cite web|url=http://www.species.asu.edu/2008_species02.php|title=International Institute for Species Exploration Top 10 - 2008 Number 2 – 75-Million Year Old Giant Duck-billed Dinosaur |work=International Institute for Species Exploration|publisher=Arizona State University|accessdate=2008-05-28]

Paleobiology

As a hadrosaurid, "Gryposaurus" would have been a bipedal/quadrupedal herbivore, eating a variety of plants. Its skull had special joints that permitted a grinding motion analogous to chewing, and its teeth were continually replacing and packed into dental batteries that contained hundreds of teeth, only a relative handful of which were in use at any time. Plant material would have been cropped by its broad beak, and held in the jaws by a cheek-like organ. Its feeding range would have extended from the ground to ~4 m (13 ft) above.

Like other bird-hipped dinosaurs of the Dinosaur Park Formation, "Gryposaurus" appears to have only existed for part of the duration of time that the rocks were being formed. As the formation was being laid down, it recorded a change to more marine-influenced conditions. "Gryposaurus" is absent from the upper part of the formation, with "Prosaurolophus" present instead. Other dinosaurs known from only the lower part of the formation include the horned "Centrosaurus" and the hollow-crested duckbill "Corythosaurus". "Gryposaurus" may have preferred river-related settings.

Nasal arch

The distinctive nasal arch of "Gryposaurus", like other cranial modifications in duckbills, may have been used for a variety of social functions, such as identification of sexes or species and social ranking. It could also have functioned as a tool for broadside pushing or butting in social contests, and there may have been inflatable air sacs flanking it for both visual and auditory signaling.cite journal |last=Hopson |first=James A. |year=1975 |title=The evolution of cranial display structures in hadrosaurian dinosaurs |journal=Paleobiology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=21–43 ] The top of the arch is roughened in some specimens, suggesting that it was covered by thick, keratinized skin, or that there was a cartilaginous extension.

References

External links

* [http://www.dinodata.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9377&Itemid=67 "Gryposaurus"] at DinoData
* [http://www.blm.gov/education/00_fieldtrip/update05.html Bureau of Land Management report] on gryposaur skulls from Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah