Twistor space

In mathematics, twistor space is the complex vector space of solutions of the twistor equation $\nabla_{A'}^{(A}\Omega^{B)}=0$. It was described in the 1960s by Roger Penrose and MacCallum^[1]. According to Andrew Hodges, twistor space is useful for conceptualizing the way photons travel through space, using four complex numbers. He also posits that twistor space may aid in understanding the asymmetry of the weak nuclear force.^[2]

For Minkowski space, denoted $\mathbb{M}$ the solutions to the twistor equation are of the form

Ω(x) = ω^A − ix^AA'π_A'

where ω^A and π^A' are two constant Weyl spinors and $x^{AA'}=\sigma^{AA'}_\mu x^{\mu}$ is a point in Minkowski space. This twistor space is a four dimensional complex vector space, whose points are denoted by Z^α = (ω^A,π_A'), and with a hermitian form

$\Sigma(Z)=\omega^{A}\bar\pi_{A}+\bar\omega^{A'}\pi_{A'}$

which is invariant under the group SU(2,2) which is a quadruple cover of the conformal group C(1,3) of compactified Minkowski spacetime.

Points in Minkowski space are related to subspaces of twistor space through the incidence relation

ω^A = ix^AA'π_A.

This incidence relation is preserved under an overall re-scaling of the twistor, so usually one works in projective twistor space, denoted PT which is isomorphic as a complex manifold to $\mathbb{CP}^3$.

Given a point $x\in M$ it is related to a line in projective twistor space where we can see the incidence relation as giving the linear embedding of a $\mathbb{CP}^1$ parametrized by π_A'.

The geometric relation between projective twistor space and complexified compactified Minkowski space is the same as the relation between lines and two-planes in twistor space, more precisely twistor space is

T := C⁴. It has associated to it the double fibration of flag manifolds P ←_μ F _ν→ M, where

projective twistor space

P := F₁(T) = P₃(C) = P(C⁴)

compactified complexified Minkowski space

M := F₂(T) = G₂(C⁴) = G_2,4(C)

the correspondence space between P and M

F := F_1,2(T)

In the above P stands for projective space, G a Grassmannian, and F a flag manifold. The double fibration gives rise to two correspondences, c := ν . μ⁻¹ and c⁻¹ := μ . ν⁻¹.

M is embedded in P₅ ~=~ P(Λ²T) by the Plücker embedding and the image is the Klein quadric.

Rationale

In the (translated) words of Jacques Hadamard: "the shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain." Therefore when studying R⁴ it might be valuable to identify it with C². However, since there is no canonical way of doing so, instead all isomorphisms respecting orientation and metric between the two are considered. It turns out that complex projective 3-space P₃(C) parametrizes such isomorphisms together with complex coordinates. Thus one complex coordinate describes the identification and the other two describe a point in R⁴. It turns out that vector bundles with self-dual connections on R⁴(instantons) correspond bijectively to holomorphic bundles on complex projective 3-space P₃(C).

See also

• Roger Penrose
• Twistor theory

References

1. ^ R. Penrose and M. A. H. MacCallum, Twistor theory: An approach to the quantisation of fields ans space-time. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(73)90008-2
2. ^ Hodges, Andrew, "One to Nine" 2009

• Ward, R.S. and Wells, Raymond O. Jr., Twistor Geometry and Field Theory, Cambridge University Press (1991). ISBN 0-521-42268-X.
• Huggett, S. A. and Todd, K. P., An introduction to twistor theory, Cambridge University Press (1994). ISBN 978-0-52145689-0.