- Brother Jonathan (steamer)
Infobox nrhp
name =BROTHER JONATHAN (Shipwreck Site)
nrhp_type =
caption = The "Brother Jonathan" as she was built in 1851
location = About 4.5 mi. SW of Pt. St. George
nearest_city =Crescent City, California
lat_degrees =
lat_minutes =
lat_seconds =
lat_direction =
long_degrees =
long_minutes =
long_seconds =
long_direction =
area =
built =
architect =
architecture =
added =May 21 ,2002
visitation_num =
visitation_year =
refnum = 02000535
mpsub =
governing_body = The "Brother Jonathan" was apaddle steamer that crashed on an uncharted rock near Point St. George, off the coast ofCrescent City, California , onJuly 30 1865 . The ship was carrying 244 passengers and crew with a large shipment of gold. Only 19 survived the wreck, making it the deadliestshipwreck up to that time on the Pacific Coast of the United States [. Although accounts vary, inspection of the passenger and crew list supports the number of 244 passenger and crew lost with 19 people surviving. Powers, Dennis (2006). Treasure Ship: The Legend and Legacy of the S.S. Brother Jonathan (paperback). New York, New York: Kensington/Citadel Press; Bowers, Q. David (1998). The Treasure ship S.S. Brother Jonathan: Her Life and Loss, 1850-1865. Wolfeboro, New Hampshire: Bowers and Merena Galleries, Inc.] It was named after "Brother Jonathan ", a character personifying theUnited States before the creation ofUncle Sam .Initial construction
The ship was commissioned by Edward Mills, a
New York er who tried to operate ashipping business during theCalifornia Gold Rush . When built in 1851, she was 220 feet (67 m) long and 36 feet (11 m) wide. Her route was from New York toChagres ,Panama , and on her very first journey set a record for the then fastest round-trip — 31 days. Passengers would cross theIsthmus of Panama and make their way north toCalifornia via another ship.In 1852, the ship was purchased by
Cornelius Vanderbilt , who operated a competing line, to replace one of his ships that had wrecked. Vanderbilt had the "Brother Jonathan" sail aroundCape Horn and used her on the Pacific side of the route. Vanderbilt also had the steamer rebuilt to accommodate more passengers.Vanderbilt's company had had an exclusive contract ferrying passengers across the isthmus through
Nicaragua , but in 1856, the Nicaraguan government canceled the agreement. The ship was then sold to Captain John Wright, whereupon she was renamed the "Commodore" and put on West Coast routes, including from her home port of San Francisco toVancouver, British Columbia , as gold prospectors wanted to reachBritish Columbia during theFraser Canyon Gold Rush .By 1861, she had fallen into disrepair and was sold again to the California Steam Navigation Company, who
retrofit ted her, restored her original name of "Brother Jonathan", and continued her on the northward route from San Francisco to Vancouver which includedPortland, Oregon , allowing prospectors to work the Salmon River Gold Rush. Over the next several years, the vessel gained a reputation as being one of the finest steamers on the Pacific Coast, being the fastest ship to make the run, sixty-nine hours each way. [Other than Powers and Bowers above, an excellent description of the history of the Brother Jonathan is found generally at Lomax, Alfred L. “Brother Jonathan: Pioneer Steamship of the Pacific Coast.” Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 60, September 1959. See also, “Brother Jonathan Began Life on East Coast, Sank in 1865.” The Daily Triplicate, September 16, 2000, 9A.]Shipwreck
On her last voyage, on a Friday, the ship ran into a heavy gale within hours after leaving San Francisco harbor and steaming north. Most of the passengers on board the "Brother Jonathan" became seasick and were confined to their rooms by the continuing storm of “frightful winds and stormy seas”. Early Sunday morning, the steamer anchored in Crescent City harbor on the first leg of its trip to Portland and Victoria, B.C. After leaving the safety of the bay that Sunday afternoon, the ship ran headfirst into more stormy conditions. The seas were so bad near the California-Oregon border that the captain ordered the ship turned around for the safety of Crescent City. [Owing to statements made later by the widow of Captain DeWolf, some accounts hold that the ship was overloaded at San Francisco, the captain ordered to set sail against his wishes, and that this contributed to the disaster. The actual load was no more than 700 tons, well beneath its 900-ton carrying capacity. Powers, pg. 10, and Bowers, pg. 255-257 (load was 500 tons), above. (All cites to Powers are to paperback edition.) See also: DeWolf, Maria (Knight). San Francisco, March 19, 1900 (handwritten biography and stories on file at the Del Norte Historical Society, Crescent City, California.)] Forty-five minutes later on that return and close to port, the ship struck the rock, tearing a large hole in its hull. Within five minutes, the captain realized the ship was going to sink and ordered the passengers and crew to abandon ship. Despite having enough lifeboats to hold all of the people on board, only three were able to be deployed. Acts of courage and desperation, fear and self-sacrifice, were numerous. [See “Told by A Survivor, the Wreck of the Brother Jonathan. Mrs. Mary Altrie’s Vivid Recollection.” San Francisco Chronicle, February 11, 1894; “A Sea Tragedy: The Brother Jonathan Wreck Revived.” Del Norte Record, February 2, 1892; Chase, Doris. “The Brother Jonathan Shipwreck Spelled an End to ‘Coffin Ships’,” The Humboldt Times, December 13, 1959, 12; “Full Particulars of the Wreck of the Brother Jonathan.” Alta California, August 10, 1865; Powers and Bowers, generally.] The rough waves capsized the first one that was lowered and smashed the second against the vessel's sides. Only a single
surfboat , holding eleven crew members, five women and three children managed to escape the wreck and make it safely to Crescent City.Among the victims were Brigadier General George Wright, the Union Commander of the
Department of the Pacific ; Dr. Anson G. Henry, Surveyor General of theWashington Territory , who was also Abraham Lincoln’s physician and closest friend; James Nisbet, a well-known publisher, who wrote a love note and his will while awaiting his death; and Roseanna Keenan, a colorful San Francisco madam, who was traveling with seven “soiled doves”. As a result of this tragedy, new laws were written to increase passenger-ship safety, including the ability of lifeboats to be released from a sinking ship. [Powers, pg. 133-135; United States Coast and Geodetic Survey. Annual Report of the Superintendent (Benjamin Peirce) of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1869-1870, Ex. Doc. No. 206, 41 Congress, 2nd Session; also, United States Printing Office. Acts of Congress Relating to Steamboats. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1867.]Divers and ships began searching for the sunken treasure two weeks after the July 30, 1865, disaster. Crates of
gold coins had been loaded on the vessel, including the annual treaty payments in gold for Indian tribes,Wells Fargo shipments consigned for Portland and Vancouver (B.C.), and gold carried on board by the passengers. A large ship’s safe safeguarded valuable jewelry, more gold coins, and gold bars. The gold alone was valued at $50 million dollars in today’s dollars. [By count of the coins discovered and those brought on board just in crates, only twenty percent of the gold, at best, was discovered. Not including the large Dobler safe, this translates into a $40 million valuation of gold on board by itself. Powers, pg. 10-11. When including the safe, estimates are even higher, including one of $108 million. See Emert, Phyllis Raybin, “California’s Golden Tragedy,” East Bay Monthly, Oakland, CA, April 1999.] Despite the attempts of numerous salvors, for over 125 years, the ship’s treasure of gold and artifacts remained one of the Pacific’s great secrets.Modern recovery efforts
Despite the fact that the "Brother Jonathan" sank so tantalizingly close to shore, the ferocious storms, rocky passageways, strong underwater currents, and darkness at the depths held the secret of her location. Although the ship sunk eight miles from Crescent City, technology needed to improve and explorers had to change their assumptions. On the last day of its 1993 expedition, Deep Sea Research (DSR) changed its theory. The men decided that the ship had actually floated underneath the ocean's surface to finally hit bottom two miles from where it first smashed into the reef. Led by Donald Knight and under risky conditions, a mini-sub on October 1, 1993, discovered the ship there at the last minute. The team over time began to bring artifacts back from a depth of 275 feet.
No human remains were ever found. However, in 1996 a mini-sub scooted past a suspicious “glint” on the bottom. On August 30, 1996, divers found the first gold coins and on that expedition recovered 875 1860s gold coins in near-mint condition. Over time, the salvors recovered 1,207 extraordinarily valuable gold coins, primarily $20
Double Eagles , in addition to numerous artifacts. However, gales menaced expeditions, divers had frightening encounters undersea, and operations were carried out 275 feet beneath the sea.Thousands of items eventually were brought up, ranging from nineteenth-century cut-crystal sherry glasses, white porcelain plates, beer mugs, and terracotta containers (once holding mineral water from
Germany ) to exquisite glassware, cups, glass containers, and multi-faceted cruet bottles. Wine and champagne bottles, crates of goods (from axe handles to doorknobs), tinctures of medicine, port holes—among many goods and objects—were discovered. [See generally Powers and Bowers. Also, McKenzie-Bahr, Mike. “Shipwreck Artifacts Come to Surface.” The Triplicate, September 6, 1997; Conservation Research Laboratory, Texas A & M. Conservation Research Laboratory Report No. 12. (http://nautarch.tamu.edu/CRL/Report12/index.htm, accessed February 10, 2008); Deep Sea Research and R2 Consultants. Report of Field Activities on the Brother Jonathan, Submerged Cultural Resource Site, Crescent City, California, August 18-31, 1997; Report submitted to the United States District Court.]While recovery efforts were being conducted, the lawsuits flew around among the salvors, the
State of California , and even numismatic (monetary) experts. No one was spared. California took the legal position that it owned the rights to the wreck and everything located close to its shores. As the state had enacted a broad law granting it these rights to "historical shipwrecks", it fought the salvor’s claims of ownership. Although every judge along the way disagreed with California’s position, a number of states with similar interests joined in the fracas. Finally, theU.S. Supreme Court in 1998 unanimously held that existing federal law controlled, declared the law(s) unconstitutional, and ruled for the salvors. [Among numerous accounts of the supreme court litigation, see California v. Deep Sea Research, 523 U.S. 491, 1998. See generally: Clifford, James O. “Is there Gold in the Deep?: Court Fight Continues over 1865 Shipwreck of Brother Jonathan,” Associated Press, February 12, 1996; Chiang, Harriet. “Finders Keepers; Treasure Hunters will be Able to Keep the Gold Found on a Shipwreck off Crescent City,” The San Francisco Chronicle, March 19, 1999, A19; Jones, John Paul. “The United States Supreme Court and Treasure Salvage: Issues Remaining after Brother Jonathan,” Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 1999, vol. 30, 205; Lorello, D. David, Jr. “The Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987: Navigating Through the Fog.” Gonzaga Law Review,1999/2000, vol. 35, 75. As to the litigation between the salvors and other aspects, see: Paddock, Richard C. “Treasure or Time Capsule?: Ex-Partners Are at Odds.” Los Angeles Times, March 17, 1996, A-1; Griffith, John. “Squabbling Over a Shipwreck.” The Oregonian, September 27, 1996, D8; Powers, pgs. 233-250.] However, California officials told DSR that they would take the fight up again to the Supreme Court on the facts, and the state received 20% of the recovered gold in a final settlement.In the first legally-recognized sale of all of the salvors' gold discovered from a sunken treasure ship, more than 500 bidders crowded into the Airport Marriott Hotel in Los Angeles for the auction of DSR’s gold coins on May 29, 1999. [“California Gold Pieces Go on Sale.” The Columbus Dispatch, June 6, 1999, 6K; Powers, pg. 313-323] The sale of its 1006 coins fetched a total of $5.3 million. Later,the finders of the coins once again appealed the Supreme Courts decision and were granted the rest of California gold coins.
Brewing for years, another battle had broken out over the authenticity of historic gold bars secretly recovered from the "Brother Jonathan" in the 1930s. Reading like a “Who’s who” in numismatic circles, these experts viciously attacked each other over these bars in a rare public controversy (the “Great Debate”) at the 1999
American Numismatic Association’s annual convention—a battle that still resounds among collectors and gold experts. This also resulted in litigation. [Powers, Chapter 17, “The Bars and the ‘Great Debate,’” pgs. 324-347]DSR set up a conservation lab for the recovered artifacts that was run by the local historical society in Crescent City, the Del Norte County Historical Society. The salvors also hired a national expert to work with the volunteers in these efforts. [Deep Sea Research and R2 Consultants. Report of Field Activities on the Brother Jonathan, Submerged Cultural Resource Site, Crescent City, California, August 18-31, 1997; Report submitted to the United States District Court. Powers, 380-385.] This small historical society has been refurbishing and maintaining the artifacts, as well as having an exhibit on the "Brother Jonathan’s" demise and a variety of the objects that were reclaimed.
Legacy
The reef the ship slammed into is now known as “Jonathan Rock,” and the
St. George Reef Lighthouse was built in response to this disaster. A memorial for the deceased, registered asCalifornia Historical Landmark #541, sits at Brother Jonathan Vista Point in Crescent City. The shipwreck is listed in theNational Register of Historic Places . [The listing of the shipwreck in the National Register of Historic Places was part of the litigation efforts by California. See Powers, pg. 255-256.] Despite the gold coins already discovered and brought up, crates of gold from the "Brother Jonathan" still remain hidden and undisturbed. The large safe with its millions of dollars of jewels, gold bars, and gold was never found. The salvors estimate that 4/5ths of the treasure is still waiting to be discovered—mere miles from land. [See Powers, pg. 10-11, and Emert above.]ee also
*
List of shipwrecks References
*cite book | first=Dennis | last=Powers | authorlink=Dennis M. Powers | title=Treasure Ship: The Legend and Legacy of the S.S. Brother Jonathan | publisher=Kensington/Citadel Press | location=New York, New York | year=2006
*cite web | url=http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/default.asp?page_id=21416 | title=Del Norte | work=California Historical Landmarks | publisher=Office of Historic Preservation | accessdate=2005-08-29
*cite web | url=http://shipwrecks.slc.ca.gov/Brother_Jonathan/Ships_History.htm | title=We’ll Find a New Captain… | first=Goodyear | last=Walker | publisher=California State Lands Commission | work=The Brother Jonathan Shipwreck Exhibit | accessdate=2006-10-31 | date=1999Footnotes
Bibliography
*“A Sea Tragedy: The Brother Jonathan Wreck Revived.” Del Norte Record, February 2, 1892.
* Bowers, Q. David (1998). The Treasure ship S.S. Brother Jonathan: Her Life and Loss, 1850-1865. Wolfeboro, New Hampshire: Bowers and Merena Galleries, Inc.
*“Brother Jonathan Began Life on East Coast, Sank in 1865.” The Daily Triplicate, September 16, 2000, 9A.
*Chiang, Harriet. “Finders Keepers; Treasure Hunters will be Able to Keep the Gold Found on a Shipwreck off Crescent City,” The San Francisco Chronicle, March 19, 1999.
*Conservation Research Laboratory, Texas A & M. Conservation Research Laboratory Report No. 12. (http://nautarch.tamu.edu/CRL/Report12/index.htm, accessed February 10, 2008).
*Deep Sea Research and R2 Consultants. Report of Field Activities on the Brother Jonathan, Submerged Cultural Resource Site, Crescent City, California, August 18-31, 1997.
*DeWolf, Maria (Knight). San Francisco, March 19, 1900 (handwritten biography and stories on file at the Del Norte Historical Society, Crescent City, California.
*Emert, Phyllis Raybin, “California’s Golden Tragedy,” East Bay Monthly, Oakland, CA, April 1999.
*“Full Particulars of the Wreck of the Brother Jonathan.” Alta California, August 10, 1865.
*Lomax, Alfred L. “Brother Jonathan: Pioneer Steamship of the Pacific Coast.” Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 60, September 1959.
*Jones, John Paul. “The United States Supreme Court and Treasure Salvage: Issues Remaining after Brother Jonathan,” Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 1999, vol. 30, 205.
*Powers, Dennis (2006). Treasure Ship: The Legend and Legacy of the S.S. Brother Jonathan (paperback). New York, New York: Kensington/Citadel Press.
*Lorello, D. David, Jr. “The Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987: Navigating Through the Fog.” Gonzaga Law Review,1999/2000, vol. 35, 75.
*"Told by A Survivor, the Wreck of the Brother Jonathan. Mrs. Mary Altrie’s Vivid Recollection.” San Francisco Chronicle, February 11, 1894.
*Report of Field Activities on the Brother Jonathan, Submerged Cultural Resource Site, Crescent City, California, August 18-31, 1997; Report submitted to the United States District Court.
*United States Printing Office. Acts of Congress Relating to Steamboats. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1867.External links
* [http://shipwrecks.slc.ca.gov/ California State Lands Commission pages on the shipwreck of the "Brother Jonathan"]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.