- Achila II
Achila II (also spelled Agila, Aquila, or Akhila because the sound represented by /j/ did not exist in Latin; died circa 714) was the king of
Visigoth icHispania (much reduced since the time of his predecessors) from 710 or 711 until his death. Achila's reign is known solely from coins and regnal lists and is unmentioned by reliable narrative histories. Gold coins of Achila's have been found bearing the inscriptions of the mints ofGerona ,Zaragoza ,Tarragona , andNarbonne . [Collins, "Visigothic", 131. According to Thompson, 251, two types of coin have been found from the Narbonnese mint.] Because the narrative sources, thenumismatics , and the regnal lists all confirm the reign ofRoderic during the same years as Achila, it is almost doubtless the fact that the two were kings in opposition to each other following Roderic's coup, which may have resulted either in or from the death of the previous king,Wittiza . [Collins, "Visigothic", 138–139. Thompson, 251, believed that Achila succeeded Roderic after his defeat and death, when only the northeast of the kingdom remained under Visigothic control.]There are more coins surviving from Achila's kingdom than Roderic's, but the findings do not overlap in territory and it is suspected that the kingdom had been divided between two factions, with the southwest (the provinces of
Lusitania and westernCarthaginiensis around the capital Toledo) following (or being subjected to) Roderic and the northeast (Tarraconensis andNarbonensis ) fallilng under the rule of Achila. [Collins, "Visigothic", 131.] It is unknown to whom the provinces ofGallaecia andBaetica fell. That Roderic and Achila never appear to have come into military conflict is probably best explained by the preoccupation of Roderic with Arab raids and not to a formal division of the kingdom. [Ibid, 139.]Two continuations of the "Chronicon Regum Visigothorum" record Achila's reign of three years following immediately upon Wittiza's. [Ibid, 132.] It has even been suggested by some scholars that Achila was in fact Wittiza's son and successor and that Roderic had tried to usurp the throne from him, even that he had been a co-ruler with Wittiza since 708. [Bachrach, 31–32.] Any son of Wittiza would have been a child in 711. [Collins, "Visigothic", 137.] Achila's reign probably began shortly after Roderic's and lasted until 713 or 714.
During Achila's brief reign, Arab raids began to plague the south of Hispania, where Roderic ruled. Roderic tried to deal with them but was killed in the trying. Some supporters of Achila may have deserted Roderic on his final campaign. [Bachrach, 32.] Because of the oppressive policy of his predecessors towards the
Jews and the large Jewish population of Narbonensis and because of what he stood to gain should Roderic be removed, military historian Bernard Bachrach has written that " [t] here is a temptation to conclude that the Muslims, King Achila, and the Jews all joined together, at least temporarily, to overthrow Roderic." [Ibid, 33.]It is possible that an ecclesiastic named
Oppa was declared king at Toledo by rivals of both Roderic and Achila, either before Roderic's defeat and death at theBattle of the Guadalete or between his death and the Arab capture of Toledo. [Collins, "Visigothic", 139.] Whatever the case, almost all of Hispania save Gallaecia, theAsturias , the country of theBasques , and the valley of theEbro had fallen to the Arabs within a couple years of Roderic's death. In 713 the Arabs and their Berber allies began the conquest of the Ebro valley, taking Zaragoza. These events coincide with the end of Achila's three-year reign and may have accounted for his death in battle with the invaders. [Ibid, 140.] The nature of the discovery of a smattering of coins atLa Bovalar nearLérida shows that La Bovalar probably fell and was razed by the invaders in 714. [Ibid, 212.] Achila was succeeded byArdo , who only reigned in Narbonensis north of the Pyrenees and probably died in the Arab invasion of that region in 721. [Ibid.]ources
*Bachrach, Bernard S. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8762%28197302%2978%3A1%3C11%3AAROVJP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-D "A Reassessment of Visigothic Jewish Policy, 589-711."] "
The American Historical Review ", Vol. 78, No. 1. (Feb., 1973), pp 11–34.
*Collins, Roger. "The Arab Conquest of Spain, 710–97". Oxford University Press, 1989.
*Collins, Roger. "Visigothic Spain, 409–711". Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
*Hodgkin, Thomas. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-8266%28188704%292%3A6%3C209%3AVS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T "Visigothic Spain."] "The English Historical Review ", Vol. 2, No. 6. (Apr., 1887), pp 209–234.
*Shaw, R. Dykes. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-8266%28190604%2921%3A82%3C209%3ATFOTVP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0 "The Fall of the Visigothic Power in Spain."] "The English Historical Review", Vol. 21, No. 82. (Apr., 1906), pp 209–228.
*Thompson, E. A. "The Goths in Spain". Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Notes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.