Niles and Sutherland Report

The Niles and Sutherland Report^[1] was a report commissioned by the United States Congress in 1919 to investigate conditions in the Ottoman Empire's eastern provinces in the aftermath of World War I, and to assess what sort of aid was needed and whether that aid could be provided by the American Committee for Relief in the Near East (Near East Relief). It was prepared by Captain Emory H. Niles of the United States Army and Arthur E. Sutherland Jr., and was based on their investigations at the city of Van and its vicinity^[2].

Harbord Commission

Niles and Sutherland's inspection of Eastern Turkey was loosely coordinated with that of General James Harbord's larger and more expansive American Military Mission to Armenia which had been instructed to "investigate and report on the political, military, geographic, administrative, economic, and such other considerations involved in possible American interests and responsibilities in the region".^[3] Harbord's group did not travel to Bitlis and Van, and their resulting report relied on information provided in Niles and Sutherland's report ^[4].

From Aleppo, Niles and Sutherland traveled by rail to Mardin, arriving there on 3 July 1919, where they engaged Osman Ruhi, a Turkish medical student, as their interpreter. The journey to Bitlis and Van was done on horseback, accompanied by a guard of Turkish soldiers. Their itinerary included Van, the Lake Region, Erzurum, Erzincan, Karakilise, and Şebinkarahisar. Because of difficulties in transportation, war damage, lack of roads, automobiles, gasoline, and sickness, they had to make changes in the planned trip. In some areas where they saw no real war damage, such as between Erzincan and Şebinkarahisar, or where ACRNE was already active, such as Trabizond, they did not spend much time.

City of Van

Arriving by horseback at the city of Van in the summer of 1919, they were the first outsiders to see Van since the end of World War I. Niles and Sutherland estimated that there were five thousand inhabitants in the city at the time, and close to one hundred thousand in the whole province. They reported that Van's Armenians (which they stated was approximately a quarter of the city's pre-war population) were all gone and that only 700 Armenians were left in the whole Van region, and they had to be protected by the soldiers from the vengeance of the Muslims. They reported that almost all of the Muslims were refugees who had escaped the invading Russians and Armenians, then returned when the Russians pulled back. Their report claimed immense death and destruction at the hands of Armenians, and stated that the Muslim sections of Van and Bitlis were completely demolished while the rest, mostly Armenian neighborhoods were mostly intact. In this, the Niles and Sutherland Report contradicts other reports, including that of the Harbord Report which found Armenian housing in other areas to be in ruins^[5] and eyewitness accounts of the actual destruction during the siege of Van in 1915.^[6][7] The report claimed that two thirds of the pre-war Muslim population was no longer in Van after the war and that there were no shops, no schools and no markets or warehouses left; only two hospitals were kept open by the efforts of the governor. Much of the city had to be rebuilt^[8].

Discovery of document

Justin McCarthy has reported that he found a draft copy of the report among the documents of the Harbord Commission held in the Library of Congress ^[9], and that he believed it to be the only surviving copy, and that all other copies, including the originals of their interviews with locals, have been either lost or more likely destroyed. ^[10].

External links

• http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2005/07/67-captain-emory-niles-and-mr-arthur.html
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Report_of_Niles_and_Sutherland_-_Investigation_through_Eastern_Turkish_Vilayets.pdf a full copy of the report.

References

1. ^ U.S. National Archives, 184.021/175
2. ^ "Niles and Sutherland Report", Justin McCarthy, Kongreye Sunulan Bildiriler: X1. Turk Tarih Kongresi, Ankara, 1990, pp. 1809-1853
3. ^ Harbord, James G., Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia, (Government Printing Office, 1920), 3.
4. ^ "All of the vilayets (provinces) of Turkish Armenia were visited except Van and Bitlis, which were inaccessible in the time available, but which have been covered by Captain Niles, an army officer who inspected them on horseback in August, and whose report corroborates the observations in the neighboring regions.35 (Footnote: Harbord in 184,02102/5, p. 2.)
5. ^ Harbord, James G., Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia, (Government Printing Office, 1920), 8.
6. ^ Ussher, Clarence D. (1917). An American Physician in Turkey. Houghton Mifflin Company. http://books.google.com/books?id=QXtCAAAAIAAJ&client.
7. ^ Nogales, Rafael de, Memoirs Of A Soldier Of Fortune, (Bradstreet Press, 1932), 270;Our ferocious onslaught and our heavy artillery fire had turned two-thirds of Van into a smouldering, fiery shambles..., 272; As soon as a building fell into our hands it was immediately set afire, to prevent the enemy from trying to recover it during the night., 274;Twelve hours after my departure, Djevded had twenty-seven shells fired into the American mission buildings, demolishing them....[1]
8. ^ The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 233-257
9. ^ "The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 1-2
10. ^ "The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 2