- Battle of Wadi (1916)
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Wad
caption=
partof=theMesopotamian Campaign
(World War I )
date=13 January 1916
place=Hanna defile , convert|3.5|mi|kmeast ofSheikh Sa'ad ,Mesopotamia , present-dayIraq
result=Decisive Ottoman victory
combatant1= flagicon|United KingdomUnited Kingdom
flagicon|India|British British India
combatant2= flagicon|Ottoman EmpireOttoman Empire
commander1= flagicon|United KingdomFenton Aylmer
flagicon|United KingdomGeorge Younghusband
flagicon|United KingdomGeorge Kemball
commander2= flagicon|German Empire Colmar von der Goltz
flagicon|Ottoman Empire Halil Pasha
strength1=19,000
strength2=22,500
casualties1=1600 dead or wounded,
numerous captured
casualties2=unknown, estimated minorThe Battle of Wadi, occurring on 13 January 1916, was an unsuccessful attempt by British forces fighting in present-day
Iraq during theFirst World War to relieve beleaguered forces under Sir Charles Townshend then under siege by theTurks atKut-al-Amara .cite web|url=http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/wadi.htm |title=Battles: The Battle of the Wadi, 1916|date=Wednesday, 27 February, 2002|accessdate=2008-09-15] cite book|last=Candler|first=Edmund|title=The Long Road to Baghdad |publisher=Cassell|location=Baghdad|date=1919|pages=311]Pushed by regional British Commander-in-Chief Sir John Nixon, General
Fenton Aylmer launched an attack against Turkish defensive positions on the banks of theWadi River .cite web|url=http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=74|title=Battle of Wadi this day in history 1916|publisher=history.com|accessdate=2008-09-15] cite book|last=Gilbert|first=Martin|title=The First World War: A complete history|publisher=Henry Holt and Co|date=2004|pages=688|isbn=0805076174] TheWadi was a steep valley of a stream that ran from the north into theRiver Tigris , some convert|6|mi|km upstream towardsKut-al-Amara from Sheikh Sa'ad. The attack is generally considered as a failure, as Fenton managed to capture the Wadi, but at a cost of 1,600 men, which led to Townshend's submission, along with 10,000 of his men, in the largest single surrender of British troops up to that time. However, the British recaptured Kut in February 1917, on their way to the capture of Baghdad the following year.cite web|url=http://www.1914-1918.net/meso_bat10.htm|title=The long long trail|publisher=1914-1918.net|accessdate=2008-09-15] cite book|last=Esposito|first=Vincent Joseph |title=A Concise History of World War I|publisher=Praeger|date=1964|pages=414]Background
On 5 December 1915, Turkish forces under the command of
Halil Kut and the German commander Baron von der Goltz, surrounded an Anglo-Indian force of 25,000 men and began the Siege of Kut-Al Amara, a city convert|50|mi|km south ofBaghdad .cite book|last=Barber|first=Major Charles H|title=Besieged in Kut - and After|publisher=Blackwood|date=1917|language=English] Replying to pleas for help from Major Charles Townshend, Mesopotamian Theatre commander Sir John Nixon dispatched theBritish Tigris Corps of 19,000 men under Lieutenant General SirFenton Aylmer to relieve the besieged garrison.cite book|last=Tucker|first=Spencer|coauthors=Priscilla Mary Roberts|title=World War I: Encyclopedia|publisher=ABC-CLIO|date=2005|pages=1661|isbn=1851094202, 9781851094202]The first attempt to relieve Kut (the Battle of Sheikh Sa'ad) came on 6 January 1916. Aylmer's advance force, under Major-General
George Younghusband , moved forward fromAli Al-Gharbi towardsSheikh Sa'ad along both banks of theTigris . Younghusband's column made contact with the Turks on the morning of 6 January, convert|3.5|mi|km east of Sheikh Sa'ad. British efforts to defeat the Turks were unsuccessful.cite web|url=http://www.1914-1918.net/nixons_second_despatch.htm|title=Nixons Second Dispatch|publisher=19141918|accessdate=2008-09-17] British casualties were heavy amounting to 4,202, including 133 officers. Following this, the Turks voluntarily abandoned their position on 9 January for an unknown reason, and retired convert|10|mi|km upstream to the Wadi.cite web|url=http://www.greatwardifferent.com/Great_War/Mesopotamia/Truth_of_Kut_01.htm|title=What happened at Kut|last=Fraser|first=Lovat|date=January 12, 1918|publisher='The War Illustrated' — 'a Pictorial Record of the Conflict of the Nations' |language=english|accessdate=2008-09-17]Preparations for the battle
Aylmer’s troops were exhausted and demoralized as they continued to make their way up the
Tigris towardKut . Their progress was hampered by the region’s typical shortage of available roads and supply routes. Aylmer planned to outflank the Wadi position, capture theHanna Defile and surround the Turkish force. The 28th Brigade under Brigadier GeneralGeorge Kemball would attack the Wadi trenches frontally, while the rest of theTigris Corps moved around the flank. However, the British troops were hampered by having no accurate maps of the area, so much of the planning was left to chance.Meanwhile, the Turkish army, under new regional commander
Khalil Pasha , set up new and firmer defensive positions—with some 20,000 troops—along the banks of the smallerWadi River , through which the British would have to pass to reach Kut.Battle of Wadi
The attack, which began in the early afternoon of 13 January — postponed from the morning because of a persistent
mist and a slow advance byartillery across the river — quickly lost the intended element of surprise, as the outnumbered British forces on both sides of enemy lines struggled to assert themselves against a robust Turkish defense. Kemball made a frontal advance, while Younghusband, with the bulk of the British force, attempted a wide turning movement. The delay seriously affected the chances of success, assmall-arms and artillery fire from the alerted Turks began to halt the British infantry movements.Lacking proper maps, the leading British column became lost. Seizing the opportunity, the Turkish units began to wheel around from a north-south orientation to an east-west, to face the British flanking manoeouvre. The resulting frontal attack by the 28th Brigade was repulsed with heavy casualties.
By dusk, it became clear that the attempt had failed. British troops, attempting to maneuver around the Turkish flanks, failed to reach the river, and the mouth of the
Hanna Defile was still strongly held by the entrenched Turks. Aylmer called off the attack by the end of the day and ferried most of his remaining troops to the right bank of theTigris .By this time, Aylmer's troops had gained control of the Wadi, but it was a small advance that was unworthy of the 1,600 men killed or wounded (including 40 British officers) in the attack and did little to bring relief closer to Townshend’s beleaguered forces at
Kut . The provision of adequate medical capacity and supplies had not improved significantly since the appalling debacle at Sheikh Sa'ad, so again many casualties suffered without treatment or evacuation for several days.Aftermath
The British continued to attempt to break through the Turkish lines over the coming months in order to rescue their brethren in
Kut , all of which were unsuccessful. In April 1916, after nearly five months under siege, Townshend finally submitted, along with 10,000 of his men, in the largest single surrender of British troops up to that time.Through mistreatment and neglect leading to starvation, nearly 5,000 British prisoners died before the end of the war. The
Siege of Kut was an important Turkish victory, greatly raising Turkish morale and prestige for the Turks in the Middle East. The British government on the other hand was forced to pour more resources intoMesopotamia .The British managed to win back Kut in February 1917, on their way to the capture of Baghdad the following year.cite web|url=http://www.1914-1918.net/meso_bat10.htm|title=The long long trail|publisher=1914-1918.net|accessdate=2008-09-15] The humiliation the British faced due to the loss of Kut had been partially rectified. The Ottoman government was forced to end its military operations in
Persia and try to build up a new army to prevent the British from moving on to capture of Mosul.References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.