- Audio compression (data)
: "For processes which reduce the amount of time it takes to listen to and understand a recording, see
time-compressed speech."Audio compression is a form of data compressiondesigned to reduce the size of audio files. Audio compression algorithms are implemented in computer software as " audio codecs". Generic data compressionalgorithms perform poorly with audio data, seldom reducing file sizes much below 87% of the original, and are not designed for use in real time. Consequently, specific audio "lossless" and "lossy" algorithms have been created. Lossy algorithms provide far greater compression ratios and are used in mainstream consumer audio devices.
image compression, both lossy and lossless compression algorithms are used in audio compression, lossy being the most common for everyday use. In both lossy and lossless compression, information redundancy is reduced, using methods such as coding, pattern recognition and linear prediction to reduce the amount of information used to describe the data.
The trade-off of slightly reduced audio quality is clearly outweighed for most practical audio applications where users cannot perceive any difference and space requirements are substantially reduced. For example, on one CD, one can fit an hour of high fidelity music, less than 2 hours of music compressed losslessly, or 7 hours of music compressed in
MP3format at medium bit rates.
Lossless audio compression
Lossless audio compression allows one to preserve an exact copy of one's audio files, in contrast to the irreversible changes from lossy compression techniques such as
Vorbisand MP3. Compression ratios are similar to those for generic lossless data compression (around 50–60% of original size), and substantially less than for lossy compression (which typically yield 5–20% of original size).
The primary use of lossless encoding are:;
Archives: For archival purposes, one naturally wishes to maximize quality.;Editing: Editing lossily compressed data leads to digital generation loss, since the decoding and re-encoding introduce artifacts at each generation. Thus audio engineers use lossless compression.;Audio quality: Being lossless, these formats completely avoid compression artifacts. Audiophiles thus favor lossless compression.
A specific application is to store lossless copies of audio, and then produce lossily compressed versions for a
digital audio player. As formats and encoders improve, one can produce updated lossily compressed files from the lossless master.
As file storage and communications bandwidth have become less expensive and more available, lossless audio compression has become more popular.
Some audio formats feature a combination of a lossy format and a lossless correction; this allows stripping the correction to easily obtain a lossy file. Such formats include
MPEG-4 SLS(Scalable to Lossless), WavPack, and OptimFROG DualStream.
Some formats are associated with a technology, such as:
Direct Stream Transfer, used in Super Audio CD
Meridian Lossless Packing, used in DVD-Audioand Dolby TrueHD, used in in Blu-rayand HD DVD
Difficulties in lossless compression of audio data
It is difficult to maintain all the data in an audio stream and achieve substantial compression. First, the vast majority of sound recordings are highly complex, recorded from the real world. As one of the key methods of compression is to find patterns and repetition, more chaotic data such as audio doesn't compress well. In a similar manner,
photographs compress less efficiently with lossless methods than simpler computer-generated images do. But interestingly, even computer generated sounds can contain very complicated waveforms that present a challenge to many compression algorithms. This is due to the nature of audio waveforms, which are generally difficult to simplify without a (necessarily lossy) conversion to frequency information, as performed by the human ear.
The second reason is that values of audio samples change very quickly, so generic data compression
algorithms don't work well for audio, and strings of consecutive bytes don't generally appear very often. However, convolutionwith the filter [-1 1] (that is, taking the first difference) tends to slightly whiten (decorrelate, make flat) the spectrum, thereby allowing traditional lossless compression at the encoder to do its job; integration at the decoder restores the original signal. Codecs such as FLAC, Shortenand TTA use linear predictionto estimate the spectrum of the signal. At the encoder, the estimator's inverse is used to whiten the signal by removing spectral peaks while the estimator is used to reconstruct the original signal at the decoder.
Lossless audio codecs have no quality issues, so the usability can be estimated by
* Speed of compression and decompression
* Degree of compression
* Software and hardware support
* Robustness and error correction
Lossy audio compression
Lossy audio compression is used in an extremely wide range of applications. In addition to the direct applications (mp3 players or computers), digitally compressed audio streams are used in most video DVDs; digital television; streaming media on the
internet; satellite and cable radio; and increasingly in terrestrial radio broadcasts. Lossy compression typically achieves far greater compression than lossless compression (data of 5 percent to 20 percent of the original stream, rather than 50 percent to 60 percent), by discarding less-critical data.
The innovation of lossy audio compression was to use
psychoacousticsto recognize that not all data in an audio stream can be perceived by the human auditory system. Most lossy compression reduces perceptual redundancy by first identifying sounds which are considered perceptually irrelevant, that is, sounds that are very hard to hear. Typical examples include high frequencies, or sounds that occur at the same time as louder sounds. Those sounds are coded with decreased accuracy or not coded at all.
While removing or reducing these 'unhearable' sounds may account for a small percentage of bits saved in lossy compression, the real savings comes from a complementary phenomenon:
noise shaping. Reducing the number of bits used to code a signal increases the amount of noise in that signal. In psychoacoustics-based lossy compression, the real key is to 'hide' the noise generated by the bit savings in areas of the audio stream that cannot be perceived. This is done by, for instance, using very small numbers of bits to code the high frequencies of most signals - not because the signal has little high frequency information (though this is also often true as well), but rather because the human ear can only perceive very loud signals in this region, so that softer sounds 'hidden' there simply aren't heard.
If reducing perceptual redundancy does not achieve sufficient compression for a particular application, it may require further lossy compression. Depending on the audio source, this still may not produce perceptible differences. Speech for example can be compressed far more than music. Most lossy compression schemes allow compression parameters to be adjusted to achieve a target rate of data, usually expressed as a
bit rate. Again, the data reduction will be guided by some model of how important the sound is as perceived by the human ear, with the goal of efficiency and optimized quality for the target data rate. (There are many different models used for this perceptual analysis, some better suited to different types of audio than others.) Hence, depending on the bandwidth and storage requirements, the use of lossy compression may result in a perceived reduction of the audio quality that ranges from none to severe, but generally an obviously audible reduction in quality is unacceptable to listeners.
Because data is removed during lossy compression and cannot be recovered by decompression, some people may not prefer lossy compression for archival storage. Hence, as noted, even those who use lossy compression (for portable audio applications, for example) may wish to keep a losslessly compressed archive for other applications. In addition, the technology of compression continues to advance, and achieving a state-of-the-art lossy compression would require one to begin again with the lossless, original audio data and compress with the new lossy codec. The nature of lossy compression (for both audio and images) results in increasing degradation of quality if data are decompressed, then recompressed using lossy compression.
A large variety of real, working audio coding systems were published in a collection in the IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC), February 1988. While there were some papers from before that time, this compendium of papers documented an entire variety of finished, working audio coders, nearly all of them using perceptual (i.e. masking) techniques and some kind of frequency analysis and back-end noiseless coding. [Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, February 1988] Several of these papers remarked on the difficulty of obtaining good, clean digital audio for research purposes. Most, if not all, of the authors in the JSAC edition were also active in the MPEG-1 Audio committee.
The world's first commercial broadcast automation audio compression system was developed by Oscar Bonello, an Engineering professor at the
University of Buenos Aires. [ [http://www.solidynepro.com/indexahtmlp_Hist-ENG,t.htm "Solidyne... 40 years of innovation"] ] In 1983, using the psychoacoustic principle of the masking of critical bands first published in 1967, [ [http://asa.aip.org/books/ear.html "The Ear as a Communication Receiver". English translation of "Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger" by Eberhard Zwicker and Richard Feldtkeller. Translated from German by Hannes Müsch, Søren Buus, and Mary Florentine. Originally published in 1967; Translation published in 1999] ] he started developing a practical application based on the recently developed IBM PCcomputer, and the broadcast automation system was launched in 1987 under the name Audicom. 20 years later, almost all the radio stations in the world were using similar technology, manufactured by a number of companies.
Transform domain methods
In order to determine what information in an audio signal is perceptually irrelevant, most lossy compression algorithms use transforms such as the
modified discrete cosine transform(MDCT) to convert time domainsampled waveforms into a transform domain. Once transformed, typically into the frequency domain, component frequencies can be allocated bits according to how audible they are. Audibility of spectral components is determined by first calculating a masking threshold, below which it is estimated that sounds will be beyond the limits of human perception.
The masking threshold is calculated using the
absolute threshold of hearingand the principles of simultaneous masking- the phenomenon wherein a signal is masked by another signal separated by frequency - and, in some cases, temporal masking- where a signal is masked by another signal separated by time. Equal-loudness contours may also be used to weight the perceptual importance of different components. Models of the human ear-brain combination incorporating such effects are often called psychoacoustic models.
Time domain methods
Other types of lossy compressors, such as the
linear predictive coding(LPC) used with speech, are "source-based coders". These coders use a model of the sound's generator (such as the human vocal tract with LPC) to whiten the audio signal (i.e., flatten its spectrum) prior to quantization. LPC may also be thought of as a basic perceptual coding technique; reconstruction of an audio signal using a linear predictor shapes the coder's quantization noise into the spectrum of the target signal, partially masking it.
Due to the nature of lossy algorithms,
audio qualitysuffers when a file is decompressed and recompressed ( digital generation loss). This makes lossy compression unsuitable for storing the intermediate results in professional audio engineering applications, such as sound editing and multitrack recording. However, they are very popular with end users (particularly MP3), as a megabyte can store about a minute's worth of music at adequate quality.
Usability of lossy audio codecs is determined by:
* Perceived audio quality
* Compression factor
* Speed of compression and decompression
* Inherent latency of algorithm (critical for real-time streaming applications; see below)
* Software and hardware support
Lossy formats are often used for the distribution of streaming audio, or interactive applications (such as the coding of speech for digital transmission in cell phone networks). In such applications, the data must be decompressed as the data flows, rather than after the entire data stream has been transmitted. Not all audio codecs can be used for streaming applications, and for such applications a codec designed to stream data effectively will usually be chosen.
Latency results from the methods used to encode and decode the data. Some codecs will analyze a longer segment of the data to optimize efficiency, and then code it in a manner that requires a larger segment of data at one time in order to decode. (Often codecs create segments called a "frame" to create discrete data segments for encoding and decoding.) The inherent latency of the coding algorithm can be critical; for example, when there is two-way transmission of data, such as with a telephone conversation, significant delays may seriously degrade the perceived quality.
In contrast to the speed of compression, which is proportional to the number of operations required by the algorithm, here latency refers to the number of samples which must be analysed before a block of audio is processed. In the minimum case, latency is 0 zero samples (e.g., if the coder/decoder simply reduces the number of bits used to quantize the signal). Time domain algorithms such as LPC also often have low latencies, hence their popularity in speech coding for telephony. In algorithms such as MP3, however, a large number of samples have to be analyzed in order to implement a psychoacoustic model in the frequency domain, and latency is on the order of 23 ms (46 ms for two-way communication).
Speech encodingis an important category of audio data compression. The perceptual models used to estimate what a human ear can hear are generally somewhat different from those used for music. The range of frequencies needed to convey the sounds of a human voice are normally far narrower than that needed for music, and the sound is normally less complex. As a result, speech can be encoded at high quality using relatively low bit rates.
This is accomplished, in general, by some combination of two approaches:
* Only encoding sounds that could be made by a single human voice.
* Throwing away more of the data in the signal -- keeping just enough to reconstruct an "intelligible" voice rather than the full frequency range of human hearing.
Perhaps the earliest algorithms used in speech encoding (and audio data compression in general) were the
A-law algorithmand the µ-law algorithm.
Average bitrate;CBR: Constant bitrate;VBR: Variable bitrate
Audio file format
Audio signal processing
Comparison of audio codecs
Digital Rights Management
Digital signal processing
List of codecs
* [http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/tec_doc_t3296_tcm6-10497.pdf EBU subjective listening tests on low-bitrate audio codecs]
* [http://www.soundexpert.info Interactive blind listening tests of audio codecs over the internet]
* For comparisons of lossless audio codecs, see [http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Lossless_comparison hydrogenaudio.org wiki comparison] ; [http://members.home.nl/w.speek/comparison.htm Speek's comparison] (note the other links as well); [http://web.inter.nl.net/users/hvdh/lossless/All.htm this graph] from [http://web.inter.nl.net/users/hvdh/lossless/lossless.htm Hans Heiden's site] and [http://www.firstpr.com.au/audiocomp/lossless/ Robin Whittle's 2003 comparison of several algorithms and discussion of Rice coding] .
*Techgage: [http://techgage.com/article/audio_archiving_guide_part_1_-_music_formats/ Audio Archiving Guide: Music Formats] (Guide for helping a user pick out the right codec)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.