Ashe v. Swenson

Ashe v. Swenson

Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=Ashe v. Swenson
ArgueDate=November 13
ArgueYear=1969
DecideDate=April 6
DecideYear=1970
FullName=Bob Fred Ashe, Petitioner v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden
USVol=397
USPage=436
Citation=90 S.Ct. 1189
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=When an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.
SCOTUS=1970-1971
Plurality=Stewart
JoinPlurality=White, Blackmun
Concurrence=Black
Concurrence2=Harlan
Concurrence3=Brennan
JoinConcurrence3=Douglas, Marshall
Dissent=Burger
LawsApplied=

"Ashe v. Swenson", 397 U.S. 436 (1970), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that "when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit." The Double Jeopardy Clause prevents a state from relitigating a question already decided in favor of a defendant at a previous trial. Here, the guarantee against double jeopardy enforceable through the Fourteenth Amendment provided that the government could not prosecute the criminal defendant in a second trial as it related to a different victim but the same robbery the criminal defendant was acquitted of in the first trial.

ee also

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 397
*"Waller v. Florida" (1970)

Further reading

*cite journal |last=Deason |first=M. C., Jr. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1970 |month= |title=Rule of Collateral Estoppel Embodied in the Fifth Amendment Guaranty against Double Jeopardy |journal=Cumberland-Samford Law Review |volume=1 |issue= |pages=355 |issn=00459275 |url= |accessdate= |quote=
*cite journal |last=Schaefer |first=Walter V. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1970 |month= |title=Unresolved Issues in the Law of Double Jeopardy: "Waller" and "Ashe" |journal=California Law Review |volume=58 |issue=2 |pages=391–404 |doi=10.2307/3479664 |url= |accessdate= |quote=

External links

* [http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./397/436/ Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (1970)] (opinion full text).


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Collateral estoppel — (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion, is a common law estoppel doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that… …   Wikipedia

  • Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution — United States of America This article is part of the series: United States Constitution Original text of the Constitution Preamble Articles of the Constitution I · …   Wikipedia

  • Waller v. Florida — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants=Waller v. Florida ArgueDate=November 13 ArgueYear=1969 DecideDate=April 6 DecideYear=1970 FullName=Joseph Waller, Jr., Petitioner v. State of Florida USVol=397 USPage=387 Citation=90 S.Ct. 1184, 25 L.Ed.2d 435 Prior …   Wikipedia

  • Double jeopardy — For other uses, see Double jeopardy (disambiguation). Criminal procedure …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 397 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 397 of the United States Reports :* United States v. Kordel , ussc|397|1|1970 * United States v. Reynolds , ussc|397|14|1970 * Czosek v. O Mara , ussc|397|25|1970 * Jones v.… …   Wikipedia

  • 5. Amendment — Der 5. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von 1791, das Fifth Amendment, stellt verschiedene Rechte eines Angeklagten sicher und ist Bestandteil der Bill of Rights. Das Fifth Amendment stellt sicher, dass Angeklagte in… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • 5. Zusatz zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika — Der 5. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von 1791, das Fifth Amendment, stellt verschiedene Rechte eines Angeklagten sicher und ist Bestandteil der Bill of Rights. Das Fifth Amendment stellt sicher, dass Angeklagte in… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • 5. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten — Der 5. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von 1791, das Fifth Amendment, stellt verschiedene Rechte eines Angeklagten sicher und ist Bestandteil der Bill of Rights. Das Fifth Amendment stellt sicher, dass Angeklagte in… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Fifth Amendment — Der 5. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von 1791, das Fifth Amendment, stellt verschiedene Rechte eines Angeklagten sicher und ist Bestandteil der Bill of Rights. Das Fifth Amendment stellt sicher, dass Angeklagte in… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • collateral estoppel doctrine — Prior judgment between same parties on different cause of action is an estoppel as to those matters in issue or points controverted, on determination of which finding or verdict was rendered. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Union Carbide Corp.,… …   Black's law dictionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
… Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”