- State Oil Co. v. Khan
Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants = State Oil Co. v. Khan
ArgueDate = October 7
ArgueYear = 1997
DecideDate = November 4
DecideYear = 1997
FullName = State Oil Company, Petitioner v. Barkat U. Khan
USVol = 522
USPage = 3
Citation =
Prior =
Subsequent =
Holding = Vertical maximum price fixing should be evaluated under the rule of reason, which can effectively identify those situations in which it amounts to anticompetitive conduct.
SCOTUS = 1994-2005
Majority = O'Connor
JoinMajority = "unanimous court"
LawsApplied ="State Oil Co. v. Kahn", 522 U.S. 3 (
1997 ), was a decision by theUnited States Supreme Court , which “does not hold that all vertical maximum price fixing is per se lawful, but simply that it should be evaluated under the rule of reason, which can effectively identify those situations in which it amounts to anticompetitive conduct.” It thereby overruled "United States v. Albrecht " (1968).ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 522 Further reading
*cite journal |last=Klein |first=Benjamin |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1999 |month= |title=Distribution Restrictions Operate by Creating Dealer Profits: Explaining the Use of Maximum Resale Price Maintenance in "State Oil v. Khan" |journal=Supreme Court Economic Review |volume=7 |issue= |pages=1–58 |doi=10.2307/1147086 |url= |accessdate= |quote=
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.