Cambrian substrate revolution

The "Cambrian substrate revolution"cite journal | author=Bottjer, D.J., Hagadorn, J.W., and Dornbos, S.Q. | title=The Cambrian substrate revolution | journal= | volume=10 | date=2000 | url=http://www.amherst.edu/~jwhagadorn/publications/CSR.pdf | accessdate=2008-06-28 | unused_data=|pp. 1–9. ] or "Agronomic revolution"Seilacher and Pflüger, 1994 Seilacher, A., Pflüger, F., 1994. From biomats to benthic agriculture: A biohistoric revolution. In: Krumbein, W.E., Peterson, D.M., Stal, L.J. (Eds.), Biostabilization of Sediments. Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Odenburg, pp. 97–105.] , evidenced in trace fossils, is the diversification of animal burrowing during the early Cambrian period.

Before this "widening of the behavioural repertoire", [S. Conway Morris, 2001] bottom-dwelling animals mainly grazed on the microbial mats that lined the surface, crawling above or burrowing just below them. These microbial mats created a barrier between the water and the sediment underneath, which was less water-logged than modern sea-floors, and almost completely anoxic (lacking in oxygen). As a result the substrate was inhabited by sulfate-reducing bacteria, whose emissions of hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) made the substrate toxic to most other organisms. cite journal | title=Microbially-Mediated Environmental Influences on Metazoan Colonization of Matground Ecosystems: Evidence from the Lower Cambrian Harkless Formation | author=Bailey, J.V., Corsetti, F.A., Bottjer, D.J., and Marenco, K.N. | journal= Palaios| volume=21 |issue=3 | date=June 2006 | doi=10.2110/palo.2005-p05-51e | url=http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.2110%2Fpalo.2005-p05-51e&ct=1 | accessdate=2008-06-28 | pages=215 ]

Around the start of the Cambrian, organisms began to burrow vertically, forming a great diversity of different fossilisable burrow forms as they penetrated the sediment for protection or to feed.cite journal
author = Seilacher, Adolf
coauthors = Luis A. Buatoisb, M. Gabriela Mángano
date = 2005-10-07
title = Trace fossils in the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition: Behavioral diversification, ecological turnover and environmental shift
journal = Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
volume = 227
issue = 4
pages = 323–356
doi = 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.003
year = 2005 ] These burrowing animals broke down the microbial mats, and thus allowed water and oxygen to penetrate a considerable distance below the surface. This restricted the sulfate-reducing bacteria and their H₂S emissions to the deeper layers, making the upper layers of the sea-floor habitable for a much wider range of organisms. The upper level of the sea-floor became wetter and softer as it was constantly churned up by burrowers.

Burrowing before the Cambrian

The traces of organisms moving on and directly underneath the microbial mats that covered the Ediacaran sea floor are preserved from the Ediacaran period, about Ma|565. The only Ediacaran burrows are horizontal, on or just below the surface, and were made by animals which fed above the surface, but burrowed to hide from predators. If these burrows are biogenic (made by organisms) they imply the presence of motile organisms with heads, which would probably have been bilaterans (bilaterally symmetrical animals). [cite journal
author = Fedonkin, M.A.
year = 1992
title = Vendian faunas and the early evolution of Metazoa
journal =
pages = 87–129
url = http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gUQMKiJOj64C&pg=PP1&ots=BkpdtmDml1&sig=ap0OD3JXuSkTVhJTSqQbT5uC2P8
isbn = 0306440679
publisher = Springer
accessdate = 2007-03-08 ] Putative "burrows" dating as far back as Ma|1100|million years may have been made by animals that fed on the undersides of microbial mats, which would have shielded them from a chemically unpleasant ocean; cite journal
author = Seilacher, A.
authorlink = Adolf Seilacher
coauthors = Bose, P.K.; Pflüger, F.
date = 1998-10-02
title = Triploblastic Animals More Than 1 Billion Years Ago: Trace Fossil Evidence from India
journal = Science
volume = 282
issue = 5386
pages = 80–83
doi = 10.1126/science.282.5386.80
accessdate = 2007-05-21
format = abstract
pmid = 9756480 ] however their uneven width and tapering ends make it difficult to believe that they were made by living organisms.cite journal
author = Budd, G.E.
coauthors = Jensen, S.
year = 2000
title = A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla
journal = Biological Reviews
volume = 75
issue = 02
pages = 253–295
doi = 10.1017/S000632310000548X
url = http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S000632310000548X
accessdate = 2007-06-27
format = abstract ] The Ediacaran burrows found so far imply simple behaviour, and the complex, efficient feeding traces common from the start of the Cambrian are absent.

The early Cambrian diversification of burrow forms

From the very start of the Cambrian period (about Ma|542) many new types of traces first appear, including well-known vertical burrows such as "Diplocraterion" and "Skolithos", and traces normally attributed to arthropods, such as "Cruziana" and "Rusophycus". The vertical burrows indicate that worm-like animals acquired new behaviours, and possibly new physical capabilities. Some Cambrian trace fossils indicate that their makers possessed hard (although not necessarily mineralised ) exoskeletons.cite journal
title=The Proterozoic and Earliest Cambrian Trace Fossil Record; Patterns, Problems and Perspectives
author=Jensen, S.
journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology
doi = 10.1093/icb/43.1.219
year=2003
volume=43
pages=219]

Advantages of burrowing

Feeding

Many organisms burrow to obtain food, either in the form of other burrowing organisms, or organic matter. The remains of planktonic organisms sink to the sea floor, providing a source of nutrition; if these organics are mixed into the sediment they can be fed upon. However, it is possible that before the Cambrian, plankton were too small to sink, so there was no supply of organic carbon to the sea floor.cite journal
author = Butterfield, N.J.
year = 2001
title = Ecology and evolution of Cambrian plankton
journal =
pages = 200–216
url = http://66.102.1.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=cache:9xeRu1SdF0QJ:www.earthscape.org/r3/ES14785/ch09.pdf+
accessdate = 2007-08-19 ] However, it appears that organisms did not feed upon the sediment itself until after the Cambrian. ]

Anchorage

Many organisms dwelt within the substrate to protect themselves from being washed away by currents.Verify source|date=July 2008

Protection

Organisms also burrow to avoid predation. Predatory behaviour first appeared over Ma|1000, but predation on large organisms appears to have first become significant shortly before the start of the Cambrian. Precambrian burrows served a protective function, as the animals that made them fed above the surface; they evolved at the same time as other organisms began forming mineralised skeletons.

Enabling burrowing

Microbial mats formed a blanket, cutting off the underlying sediments from the ocean water above. This meant that the sediments were anoxic, and hydrogen sulfide (h2s) was abundant. The free exchange of the pore waters with oxygenated ocean water was essential to make the sediments inhabitable. This exchange was made possible by the action of minute animals: too small to produce burrows of their own, this meiofauna inhabited the spaces between sand grains in the microbial mats. Their bioturbation— movement that dislodged grains and disturbed the resistant biomats— broke them up, allowing water and chemicals to mix on both sides of the mat.

Effects of the revolution

The Cambrian substrate revolution was a long and patchy process that proceeded at different rates in different locations throughout much of the Cambrian. [ cite journal
title=Evidence for seafloor microbial mats and associated metazoan lifestyles in Lower Cambrian phosphorites of Southwest China
author=Dornbos, S., Bottjer, D., and Chen, J.-Y.
journal=Lethaia | issue=2 | date=June 2004 | pages=127–137
doi=10.1080/00241160410004764
url=http://www.uwm.edu/~sdornbos/PDF's/Dornbos%20et%20al.%202004.pdf | accessdate=2008-08-04
volume=37 ]

Effects on ecosystems

After the agronomic revolution, the microbial mats that had covered the Ediacaran sea floor became increasingly restricted to a limited range of environments:
*Very harsh environments, such as hyper-saline lagoons or brackish estuaries, which were uninhabitable for the burrowing organisms that broke up the mats.
*Rocky substrates which the burrowers could not penetrate.
*The depths of the oceans, where burrowing activity today is at a similar level to that in the shallow coastal seas before the revolution.Ironically, the first burrowers probably fed on the microbial mats, while burrowing underneath them for protection; this burrowing led to the downfall of the mats they were feeding on.The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota|Dzik, J|The Verdun Syndrome: simultaneous origin of protective armour and infaunal shelters at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition|405|414|30]

Before the revolution, bottom dwelling organisms fell into four categories:
*"mat encrusters", which were permanently attached to the mat;
*"mat scratchers", which grazed the surface of the mat without destroying it;
*"mat stickers", suspension feeders that were partially embedded in the mat; and
*"undermat miners", which burrowed underneath the mat and fed on decomposing mat material.

The "undermat miners" appear to have died out by the middle of the Cambrian period. "Mat encrusters" and "mat stickers" either died out or developed more secure anchors that were specialised for soft or hard substrates. "Mat scratchers" were restricted to rocky substrates and the depths of the oceans, where both they and the mats could survive.Early sessile echinoderms were mostly "mat stickers". The helicoplacoids failed to adapt to the new conditions and died out; the edrioasteroids and eocrinoids survived by developing holdfasts for attachment to hard substrates, and stalks that raised their feeding apparatus above most of the debris that burrowers stirred up in the looser sea-floors. Mobile echinoderms (stylophorans, homosteleans, homoiosteleans, and ctenocystoids) were not significantly affected by the substrate revolution.

Early molluscs appear to have grazed on microbial mats, so it is natural to hypothesize that grazing molluscs were also restricted to areas where the mats could survive. The earliest known fossils of monoplacophoran ("single-plated") molluscs date from the Early Cambrian, where they grazed on microbial mats. Most modern monoplacophorans live on soft subtrates in deep parts of the seas, although one genus lives on hard substrates at the edges of continental shelves. Modern monoplacophorans have less diverse shell forms than fossil genera. Unfortunately the oldest known fossils of polyplacophorans (molluscs with multiple shell plates) are from the Late Cambrian, when the substrate revolution had significantly changed marine environments. Since they are found with stromatolites (stubby pillars bult by some types of microbial mat colony), it is thought that polyplacophorans grazed on microbial mats. Modern polyplacophorans mainly graze on mats on rocky coastlines, although a few live in the deap sea. No fossils have been found of aplacophorans (shell-less molluscs), which are generally regarded as the most primitive living molluscs. Some burrow into the sea-floors of deep waters, feeding on micro-organisms and detritus; others live on reefs and eat coral polyps. [ cite web | url=http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/taxa/inverts/mollusca/aplacophora.php | title=The Aplacophora | publisher=University of California Museum of Paleontology | accessdate=2008-07-03 ]

Palaeontological significance

The revolution put an end to the conditions which allowed exceptionally preserved fossil beds such as the Burgess shale to be formed. The direct consumption of carcasses was relatively unimportant in reducing fossilisation, compared to changes in sediments' chemistry, porosity, and microbiology, which made it difficult for the chemical gradients necessary for soft-tissue mineralisation to develop.cite journal | title=Post-Cambrian closure of the deep-water slope-basin taphonomic window | author= Orr, P.J., Benton, M.J., and Briggs, D.E.G. | year = 2003 | doi = 10.1130/G19193.1 | url=http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130%2FG19193.1 | accessdate=2008-06-28 | journal= Geology| volume=31 | pages=769 ] Just like microbial mats, environments which could produce this mode of fossilisation became increasingly restricted to harsher and deeper areas, where burrowers could not establish a foothold; as time progressed, the extent of burrowing increased sufficiently to effectively make this mode of preservation impossible. Post-Cambrian lagerstatte of this nature are typically found in very unusual environments.

The rise in burrowing is of further significance, for burrows provide firm evidence of complex organisms; they are also much more readily preserved than body fossils, to the extent that the absence of trace fossils has been used to imply the genuine absence of large, motile bottom-dwelling organisms. This furthers palaeontologists' understanding of the early Cambrian, and provides an additional line of evidence to show that the Cambrian explosion represents a real diversification, and is not a preservational artefact - even if its timing did not coincide directly with the Agronomic revolution.

The rise of burrowing represents such a fundamental change to the ecosystem, that the appearance of the complex burrow "Trichophycus pedum" is used to mark the base of the Cambrian period. though it has since been found in lower, technically "Precambrian", strata.
*Cite journal
last = Gehling
first = James
last2 = Jensen
first2 = Sören
last3 = Droser
first3 = Mary
last4 = Myrow
first4 = Paul
last5 = Narbonne
first5 = Guy
title = Burrowing below the basal Cambrian GSSP, Fortune Head, Newfoundland
journal = Geological Magazine
volume = 138
issue = 2
pages = 213–218
date = March 2001
year = 2001
url = http://www.journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=74669
doi = 10.1017/S001675680100509X]

External links

* [http://www.astrobio.net/news/article251.html A fun summary at AstroBio magazine]

References