- Bite the bullet
To "bite the bullet" is to accept the
consequence s of a hard choice. [ [http://books.google.com/books?id=yNjM75ItNKAC&pg=PA29&dq=bite+the+bullet+philosopher&sig=zxV-AuvTVtdhoqLrS-iiCY07o2I#PPA28,M1 Thinking from A to Z p.28] ] It is derived historically from the practice of having a patient clench abullet in his or her teeth as a way to cope with the extreme pain of asurgical procedure withoutanesthetic . [cite web
url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bite%20the%20bullet
title=bite the bullet
publisher=Dictionary.com
work=The American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
accessdate=2008-03-17] [cite web
url=http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/65400.html
title=Bite the bullet
publisher=The Phrase Finder
accessdate=2008-03-17]In
philosophy , a major goal is to always sustain aconsistent set of beliefs using soundreasoning . Often this will involve accepting a belief that is a disturbing truth. It may be disturbing because it is counterintuitive or has other disturbing consequences. Given a philosopher's previously held beliefs he or she may have to "bite the bullet" by accepting a particular claim offered as an extreme case orcounterexample .Examples
* The strict utilitarian will be forced to admit that if it can be shown that punishing an innocent person would increase the total happiness of the whole society, then there are times when it is morally good to punish an innocent person. [ [http://books.google.com/books?id=yNjM75ItNKAC&pg=PA29&dq=bite+the+bullet+philosopher&sig=zxV-AuvTVtdhoqLrS-iiCY07o2I#PPA28,M1 Thinking from A to Z p.29] ]
* The
Euthyphro dilemma can be resolved by a Divine command theorist by simply accepting that ifGod tells us to do something which appears to be immoral, then we are to accept that it really is moral in the bigger picture, and that it only appears to be immoral. [http://www.iep.utm.edu/d/divine-c.htm#SH4a Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]* A
consequentialist believes that what is called "right" or "wrong" depends on what consequences come about as a result of a proposed action. As a way to test this view, some counterexamples may be considered which are intended to find out if this view holds up in extreme cases. One may object, for example, that some actions appear to be "right in principle" even when terrible consequences have resulted from them. Also, there may be times when an action appears to be wrong in principle, but has wonderful consequences. A person wanting to stay faithful to the consequentialist view in the face of an extreme case may have to "bite the bullet" by taking the position that even though these counterexamples do exist the original view still holds up: ::"Even though both drivers were driving recklessly, only the one that is caught and ticketed suffers a penalty. It's okay that some people are treated differently based solely on their luck.":Accepting the existence ofmoral luck may seem counterintuitive or even unreasonable to some, so this statement of acceptance can be seen as "biting the bullet."See also
*
Reductio ad absurdum
*Unintended consequence References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.