- Graeme Leung
Graeme Everrett Leung is a
Fiji an lawyer and former President of theFiji Law Society . He is also Chairman of the Electoral Commission, and has been named asJudge Advocate of a Court Martial panel to retry 20 soldiers convicted mutiny in relation to theFiji coup of 2000 , but a number of complications left his commissioning in that office outstanding until he was finally approved as Judge Advocate and commissioned as an Army officer with the rank ofLieutenant Colonel on4 January 2006 .Privately, Leung is a senior partner at Howards, a commercial law firm.
Political controversies
Leung is an outspoken critic of certain government policies which, he says, undermine the rule of law. In particular, he has opposed the early release of persons convicted and imprisoned for offenses related to the
Fiji coup of 2000 , and the promotion of legislation which he believes undermines respect for the rule of law.Leung strongly opposed the government's decision, announced on
29 November 2004 , to release Vice-PresidentRatu Jope Seniloli from prison, where he had served little more than three months of a four-year sentence for his role in theFiji coup of 2000 . "It lends the appearance of two sets of rules, or two classes of justice. It lends the appearance that if you're well connected and of a high social standing, you might expect more favor with the authorities. Conversely, if you are a person of lesser social standing, you might expect the full brunt of the law to weigh on you. Now that seems to me to be a travesty," he said.Addressing the annual conference of the
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association inNadi on8 September , Leung said that the concept of true democracy was not well understood in Fiji. "Democracy, the rule of law and human rights march hand in hand. These concepts are not well understood by a good portion of the population," he said. "It is far more than merely participating in free and fair elections for a new government. It is about playing by a set of rules, respecting those rules and accepting the result even when it may not be what one had hoped for." ManyFijian people feared that could undermine their way of life, essence, and identity, he said. Rather than ridicule these fears, it was necessary to understand and address them, and to develop a new paradigm to illustrate the consonance between Fijian traditions and democratic norms. "The evidence shows a growing albeit reluctant acceptance of the rule of law," he said. "But time, patience and a genuine commitment not just of the country's leaders towards creating an environment that will allow democracy, human rights and the rule of law to flourish, will be required."The Reconciliation, Tolerance, and Unity Bill
On
21 May 2005 , Leung joined numerous politicians, human rights organizations, and the military in opposing the government's proposed legislation to establish a Reconciliation and Unity Commission, which would be empowered, subject to presidential approval, to grant compensation to victims of the2000 coup andamnesty to persons found guilty of involvement in it. Leung said that he and the Law Society supported the bill's purported aims of reconciliation, tolerance, and unity, but were strongly opposed to the amnesty provisions of the legislation, which he said were "repugnant" and would empower politicians to overturn judicial decisions. "It's likely to demoralise the judiciary and sap it of the will to continue its work," he said. It would also encourage future generations to regard coups as something they could take part in with impunity.In a letter to Prime Minister
Laisenia Qarase on23 May , Leung said that as reconciliation and forgiveness were matters of the heart, they could not be legislated, and the bill would therefore fail to achieve its stated objectives. "The bill is not the answer to Fiji's problems," he said. He also expressed concern that the way the bill was written, linking compensation with amnesty, rich perpetrators of the 2000 coup would benefit the most. Citing the Fijian cultural inhibition on frank expression of strong opinions, he said that it would be unwise for the government to interpret the silence of the majority of its citizens as approval of its agenda. "It's the way we are - our people show their respect to their leaders by keeping quiet. It is considered rude to speak your mind," he said.In a parliamentary submission on
16 June , Leung called the bill a recipe for instability, terror and payback, and a retrograde step, which could threaten present and future governments. "It would encourage the belief that if people think they have sufficiently good political reason to topple a government, politicians might consider granting them a pardon," Leung said. He expressed content that the decisions of the Commission and Amnesty Committee would not be required to state any reasons for their decisions, which would not be subject to appeal. He said it was "abhorrent and unacceptable" to create what amounted to retrospective legalization of a terrorist act.While opposing the legislation, however, Leung cautioned the military to show restraint, saying that Parliament had the constitutional Right to pass laws, whether good or bad, and that it was up to the people to punish politicians for bad laws at election time. "If the law is bad and unpopular, it is for the people through the ballot box, to show their displeasure," he said on
21 May . "But in a democracy, it is not the business of the military, however well-intentioned, to interfere with the law-making process."On
4 July , theFiji Times revealed that Leung had been trying for over a week to schedule a meeting with the Prime Minister, without receiving a response. Then on5 July , Leung called for an urgent meeting with Attorney-GeneralQoriniasi Bale in an effort to persuade him to rewrite the bill, in response to recent comments by Military CommanderFrank Bainimarama calling the bill a form of "ethnic cleansing ." Leung said that every right thinking person should be alarmed that the debate had risen to that level.Law Society President
On
3 September 2005 , Leung fended off a challenge fromLautoka -based lawyer Iqbal Khan to win a second term as president of the Fiji Law Society, amassing 91 percent of the vote. The term was for one year. Khan's campaign had been undermined by allegations that he had been barred from practicing law in theAustralia n state ofQueensland for corruption. He chose to retire from the presidency in2006 , andDevanesh Sharma was elected to succeed him on9 September .Judge Advocate
On
5 October 2005 , Leung was namedJudge Advocate of a court martial panel to retry 20 soldiers convicted of mutiny in relation to theFiji coup of 2000 . He was the only civilian member of the 10-member panel. On19 October , however, he was abruptly dismissed by President Ratu Josefa Iloilo, but was subsequently reinstated on26 October . The reasons for the dismissal and reinstatement were not fully clarified, but it was understood that the President had wanted to explore the matter thoroughly before ratifying Leung, the choice of the Military, as Judge Advocate. The trial was subsequently rescheduled, and adjourned, several times.When the Military Commander, Commodore
Frank Bainimarama , raised questions about why the commissioning process was taking so long, Home Affairs MinisterJosefa Vosanibola revealed on21 December that the government objected to what he said were Leung's exorbitant fees. "Even the Chief Justice ... (does) not get that kind of money," he said of the proposed F$130,000 contract. Commodore Bainimarama disagreed, saying that the same sum had been paid to the previous Judge Advocate.On
4 January 2006 , Home Affairs Minister Vosanibola announced that Leung had been approved as Judge Advocate, and commissioned as an Army officer, with the rank ofLieutenant Colonel . The delay had been caused by the need to gain further information from the Military, he claimed, but Military spokesmanCaptain Neumi Leweni denied this.Speaking to the media on
10 January 2005 , clarified that he would not be receiving the F$130,000 remuneration as a lump sum. That was his annual remuneration, he said; the monthly remuneration amounted to one twelfth of that - considerably less than what he would be paid by private clients, whose custom he had to forego for the sake of the court martial. Leung said he accepted the role of Judge Advocate after many others had declined it, because he felt strongly about the rule of law and the concept of justice.Commonwealth Lawyers Association
It was revealed on
6 March 2006 that Leung had been elected onto the Council of theCommonwealth Lawyers Association . Founded in1983 , the Council is a professional association of lawyers working to uphold the rule of law among the 53-memberCommonwealth of Nations . Leung is the second lawyer from a Pacific Islands nation to serve on the Council. The first was Ms. Alofa Seruvatu, former Secretary of the Fiji Law Society, who was elected in 2004.Personal life
Leung grew up in Levuka, Ovalau, but now resides in Suva. Now in his mid-40s, Leung remains a
bachelor as of2006 .
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.