Albrighton v. RPA Hospital

Albrighton v. RPA Hospital

"Albrighton v. RPA Hospital" (1980) 2 NSWLR 542 is a tort law case concerning the application of the Bolam test for professional negligence.

Facts

A patient in Royal Prince Alfred Hospital who had been born with a spinal problem had her spinal cord totally severed leaving her a paraplegic.

Judgment

Mr Justice Reynolds found that a major issue was the relationship between the hospital and the doctors, that the hospital was not liable nor vicariously liable but that the doctors who performed the operation were negligent. He also said, "The more recent approach is to replace the law, not legal practitioners, as the means of defining negligence".

ee also

*Negligence
*"Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee"
*"F v. R"

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee — Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee ( [1957] 1 WLR 583) is an English tort law case that lays down the typical rule for assessing the appropriate standard of reasonable care in negligence: the Bolam test . Where the defendant has… …   Wikipedia

  • F v. R — (1983) 33 SASR 189 is a tort law case. It is a seminal case on what information medical professionals have a duty to inform patients of at common law.It pre dates the decision in Rogers v. Whitaker which substantially followed F v. R by departing …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
… Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”