- Universality (dynamical systems)
In

statistical mechanics ,**universality**is the observation that there are properties for a large class of systems that are independent of the dynamical details of the system. Systems that display universality tend to be chaotic and often have a large number of interacting parts. The term universality was popularized byLeo Kadanoff in the late 1970s, but the concept was certainly known since the 1950s.The term is slowly gaining a broader usage in several fields of mathematics, including

combinatorics andprobability theory , whenever the quantitative features of a structure (such as asymptotic behaviour) can be deduced from a few global parameters appearing in the definition, without requiring knowledge of the details of the system.The

renormalization group effectively explains universality, in that it classifies observables into relevant and irrelevant classes, and is thus able to classify different systems intouniversality classes .**Universality in statistical mechanics**The notion of universality originated in the study of

phase transition s in statistical mechanics. A phase transition occurs when a material changes its properties in a dramatic way: water, as it is heated boils and turns into vapor; or a magnet, when heated, loses its magnetism. Phase transitions are characterized by anorder parameter , such as the density or the magnetization, that changes as a function of a parameter of the system, such as the temperature. The special value of the parameter at which the system changes its phase is the system'scritical point . For systems that exhibit universality, the closer the parameter is to itscritical value , the less sensitively the order parameter depends on the details of the system.If the parameter β is critical at the value β

_{c}, then the order parameter "a" will be well approximated by:$a=a\_0\; |\; eta-eta\_c\; |^alpha.,$

The exponent α is a

critical exponent of the system. The remarkable discovery made in the second half of thetwentieth century was that very different systems had the same critical exponents.In 1976,

Mitchell Feigenbaum discovered universality in iterated maps.**Examples**Universality gets its name because it is seen in a large variety of physical systems. Examples of universality include:

*

Avalanche s in piles of sand. The likelihood of an avalanche is in power-law proportion to the size of the avalanche, and avalanches are seen to occur at all size scales. This is termed "self-organized criticality ".

* The formation and propagation of cracks and tears in materials ranging from steel to rock to paper. The variations of the direction of the tear, or the roughness of a fractured surface, are in power-law proportion to the size scale.

* Theelectrical breakdown ofdielectric s, which resemble cracks and tears.

* Thepercolation of fluids through disordered media, such aspetroleum through fractured rock beds, or water through filter paper, such as inchromatography . Power-law scaling connects the rate of flow to the distribution of fractures.

* Thediffusion ofmolecule s insolution , and the phenomenon ofdiffusion-limited aggregation .

* The distribution of rocks of different sizes in an aggregate mixture that is being shaken (with gravity acting on the rocks).

* The appearance ofcritical opalescence in fluids near aphase transition .**Theoretical overview**One of the important developments in

materials science in the 1970s and the 1980s was the realization thatstatistical mechanics could be used to provide a microscopic theory of universality. The core observation was that, for all of the different systems, the behaviour resembles aphase transition , and that the language of statistical mechanics may be applied to describe these systems. Thus, for example, the scaling exponents in all of these systems are known ascritical exponents .The key observation is that near a phase transition or

critical point , disturbances occur at all size scales, and thus one should look for an explicitlyscale-invariant theory to describe the phenomena, as seems to have been put in a formal theoretical framework first by Pokrovsky and Patashinsky in 1965. Universality is a by-product of the fact that there are relatively few scale-invariant theories. For any one specific physical system, the detailed description may have many scale-dependent parameters and aspects. However, as the phase transition is approached, the scale-dependent parameters play less and less of an important role, and the scale-invariant parts of the physical description dominate. Thus, a simplified, and oftenexactly solvable , model can be used to approximate the behaviour of these systems near the critical point.Percolation may be modeled by a random

electrical resistor network, with electricity flowing from one side of the network to the other. The overall resistance of the network is seen to be described by the average connectivity of the resistors in the network.The formation of tears and cracks may be modeled by a random network of

electrical fuse s. As the electric current flow through the network is increased, some fuses may pop, but on the whole, the current is shunted around the problem areas, and uniformly distributed. However, at a certain point (at the phase transition) acascade failure may occur, where the excess current from one popped fuse overloads the next fuse in turn, until the two sides of the net are completely disconnected and no more current flows.To perform the analysis of such random-network systems, one considers the stochastic space of all possible networks (that is, the

canonical ensemble ), and performs a summation (integration) over all possible network configurations. As in the previous discussion, each given random configuration is understood to be drawn from the pool of all configurations with some given probability distribution; the role of temperature in the distribution is typically replaced by the average connectivity of the network.The expectation values of operators, such as the rate of flow, the

heat capacity , and so on, are obtained by integrating over all possible configurations. This act of integration over all possible configurations is the point of commonality between systems instatistical mechanics andquantum field theory . In particular, the language of therenormalization group may be applied to the discussion of the random network models. In the 1990s and 2000s, stronger connections between the statistical models andconformal field theory were uncovered. The study of universality remains a vital area of research.**References**

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*