Republic of Lakotah

Infobox_Country
native_name=
conventional_long_name ="Lakotah"
common_name=Lakotah


symbol_type=National Emblem


map_caption = Location of Lakotah in USA‎
national_motto=Mitaku Oyasin (Lakota), "We Are All Related"
national_anthem=
official_languages=Lakota,English
capital="none officially declared"
Porcupine, South Dakota (unofficial)
largest_city = Omaha
government_type=Confederation (proposed)
leader_title1=Chief Facilitator
leader_title2=
leader_name1=Russell Means
leader_name2=
area_magnitude=
area_km2=200, 000
area_sq_mi=77, 220
percent_water=
population_estimate=100, 000 [ [http://www.unpo.org/member_profile.php?id=35 Lakota Nation] from UNPO] (including only people of Lakota origin)
population_estimate_year=2005
population_estimate_rank =
population_census=
population_census_year=
population_density_km2=
population_density_sq_mi=
population_density_rank=
GDP_PPP_year=
GDP_PPP=
GDP_PPP_rank=
GDP_PPP_per_capita=
GDP_PPP_per_capita_rank=
sovereignty_type=Independence
sovereignty_note=from United States
established_event1=nowrap|Proclaimed
established_date1=December 192007
established_event2=nowrap|Recognition
established_date2=unrecognized
HDI_year=
HDI=
HDI_rank=
HDI_category=
currency= Currently USD ($)
currency_code=
country_code=
cctld= "None assigned"
calling_code=1
footnotes=Rankings may not be available because of its unrecognized "de facto" state.

Lakotah or Lakota is a proposed country in North America to serve as a homeland for the Lakota.

Its boundaries would be within the ones of the United States, covering thousands of square miles in North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. The proposed borders are those of an earlier treaty between the United States and the Lakota.

Background

A group of Native Americans called the Lakota Freedom Delegation traveled to Washington, DC on 17 December 2007 and delivered a statement asserting the independence of the Lakota from the United States. The group argues that the recent declaration of independence is not a secession from the USA, but rather a reassertion of sovereignty.

The Lakota Freedom Delegation does not recognize tribal governments or presidents as recognized by the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, sometimes referring to these groups as "stay-by-the-fort Indians".cite web|url=http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096416361|title=Delegates announce pullout from U.S. treaties|author=Jerry Reynolds|publisher=Indian Country Today|date=2007-12-28|accessdate=2007-12-31]

Territory, demographics and economics

The claimed boundaries of Lakotah are the Yellowstone River to the north, the North Platte River to the south, the Missouri River to the east and an irregular line marking the west.cite web|url= http://www.republicoflakotah.com/map.html|title=Map|publisher=Republic of Lakotah|accessdate=2008-01-02] cite web|url= http://www.lakotaoyate.com/about.html|title=About|publisher=Lakota Oyate|accessdate=2008-01-04] These borders coincide with those set by the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie:

By these claims, the largest city in Lakotah is Omaha, Nebraska. The boundaries also contain Rapid City, South Dakota; Mandan, North Dakota; Casper, Wyoming; and Bellevue, Nebraska as well as Mount Rushmore.

In addition to containing all the Indian reservations of the Lakota, the territory which the Republic claims includes reservations inhabited by non-Lakota Siouan peoples (Dakota Indian Reservation, Winnebago Indian Reservation and Omaha Indian Reservation) as well as part of one non-Sioux reservation: the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in western North Dakota. They also contain the poorest counties in the United States.

Activities

The Republic of Lakotah is in negotiations to establish its own energy company, and hopes to develop solar and wind power and sell surplus electricity to the United States. This would represent a continuation of projects in the past that have sourced renewable energy on tribal lands. [cite web|url= http://www.eere.energy.gov/tribalenergy/projects_detail.cfm/project_id=35|title=Tribal Energy Program: Rosebud Sioux Tribe - 1999 Project|date=2007-04-17|accessdate=2008-01-01|publiher=U.S. Department of Energy Energ Efficiency and Renewable Energy Information Center] The Republic also hopes to expand the farming of sugar beets for biofuel. As of January 1 2008, the Republic announced they were filing liens on all government-held lands within their claimed borders;cite press release|url=http://www.republicoflakotah.com/docs/noticeofliens.pdf|title= Notice to All Foreign Governments and Private Owners of Real Estate within the Republic of Lakotah|date=2008-01-01|accessdate= 2008-01-02|format=PDF] however, the first round of liens, in an unnamed county in South Dakota, were rejected.

Following this, the Republic of Lakotah has chosen to concentrate on recovery of the Black Hills.cite web |url=http://www.indymedia.org/en/2008/01/899372.shtml |title=Republic of Lakotah focuses on Black Hills |date=15 January 2008 |accessdate=2008-01-02 ]

In July 2008, Russell Means announced that the Republic of Lakotah would be founding an all-Lakota "grand jury" to investigate corruption by government officials on the seven reservations in the Republic's claimed territory. [cite web |date=July 28, 2008 |publisher=Rapid City Journal |url=http://rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2008/07/28/news/local/doc488d2d87d0b09450038082.txt |accessdate=2008-07-28 |author=Andrea J. Cook | title=Republic of Lakotah investigating tribal corruption]

Politics and government

Citizenship is open to all Lakotah people and to any resident of the land Lakotah claims who renounce their United States citizenship. The group plans to issue its own passports and driving licenses in the name of the proposed nation.cite news|title=Sitting Bull's tribe declares independence|url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/21/windian121.xml|author=Catherine Elsworth|date=2007-12-26| publisher=The Daily Telegraph|accessdate=2007-12-31]

The Republic of Lakotah proposes that the nation be organized as a confederation that would respect the libertarian principles of "posse comitatus" and "caveat emptor", would offer "individual liberty through community rule," and would collect no nationwide taxes. However, individual communities within the proposed nation would be allowed to levy taxes with the consent of the taxed. No currency has yet been proposed but Russell Means has suggested that the proposed nation should not use fiat currency but instead adopt a gold standard. [http://www.freetalklive.com/files/means.mp3 Russell Means interview] from December 26 2007 on Free Talk Live] Means has stated that this system of government is derived from the traditional Lakota government system. Means said, "we are going to implement how we lived prior to the Invasion. Each community will be a mini-state unto itself ... They will form the federation known as Lakotah."cite video|url= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlIYGE3JRsA |title=Republic of Lakota|date=2008-03-03|publisher=Republic of Lakotah, hosted on YouTube|accessdate=2008-01-03] Currently, Russell Means identifies himself as "Chief Facilitator" of a provisional government of the Republic of Lakotah. The provisional government is currently being operated out of Treaty School/Ranch in Porcupine, South Dakota, on the Pine Ridge reservation. [cite web|url=http://republicoflakotah.com/forum/index.php?topic=112.0|title=Republic of Lakotah web forum|publisher=Republic of Lakotah|date=2008-07-01|accessdate=2008-08-01]

The four signatories of the Lakota Freedom Delegation's letter to the State Department that announced withdrawal from the US identified themselves by the title of "itacan of Lakota" in a press release.cite press release|url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1220-02.htm|title=Freedom! Lakota Sioux Indians Declare Sovereign Nation Status|date=2007-12-20|publisher=Lakota Freedom Delegation|accessdate=2007-12-31] Leaders of communities would be informally chosen by elders of the community.

Government

The following people have identified themselves as members of the provisional government of Lakotah, or been so identified by other members of the movement:
* Russell Means, chief facilitator
* Jerry Collette, interim attorney generalcite web |url=http://republicoflakotah.com/Collette.html |title=REPORT |date=February 9, 2008 |accessdate=2008-03-05 |publisher=republicoflakotah.com]
* Robert Robideau, facilitatorcite web |url=http://www.republicoflakotah.com/Robideau.html |title=REPORT |date=February 8, 2008 |accessdate=2008-03-05 |publisher=republicoflakotah.com]
* Tegheya Kte, also called by Garry Rowland, (fully Clarence Gary Anthony Rowland), facilitatorcite web |url=http://www.republicoflakotah.com/Rowland.html |title=REPORT |date=February 24, 2008 |accessdate=2008-03-05 |publisher=republicoflakotah.com]
* Phyllis Young, provisional government memberDecisions within the community are traditionally made by Lakotah Elders, who are valued for their experience. Lakotah Elders will continue to hold power within an independent nation.

No formal capital of Lakotah has been announced. The Republic of Lakotah gives its provisional capital as Porcupine, South Dakota with hopes in the long run to move administration to near Rapid City, South Dakota.cite web|url= http://www.republicoflakotah.com/FAQ.html |title=FAQ|publisher=Republic of Lakotah|accessdate=2008-01-07]

Connections with other movements

Through its membership and work, the Republic of Lakotah has several direct ties to other activist movements among both the Indian and libertarian communities.

Russell Means and Robert Robideau have both long been prominent in the Autonomous American Indian Movement, with Means along with Tegheya Kte having taken part in the Wounded Knee incident and Robideau acquitted in a trial related to the Leonard Peltier case. Jerry Collette has announcedcite web |url=http://www.libertyforall.net/?p=1201 |title=The move for Lakotah independence |publisher=Liberty For All |date=March 4, 2008 |accessdate=2008-03-04 |author=Jerry Collette] that Means intends to pursue the tribal presidency of the Oglala Lakota in the 2008 election. Tegheya Kte, meanwhile, led the Big Foot Riders in 2007cite web |url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1227-03.htm |title=Chief Big Foot Riders Return To Wounded Knee, "We Want To Be Free" |date=December 27, 2007 |publisher=commondreams.org] , while Phyllis Young is a founder of the Women of All Red Nations feminist movement. [cite book
last = Josephy
first = Alvin M.
coauthors =Joane Nagel, Troy R. Johnson
title = Red Power: The American Indians' Fight for Freedom
publisher = U of Nebraska Press
year = 1999
location =
pages = 51
url = http://books.google.com/books?id=DreCFo6MrR8C&dq
doi =
id =
isbn = 0803225873]

Jerry Collette, meanwhile, was heavily involved in a number of libertarian political campaigns in the United States, cite web |url=http://www.libertarianlegal.org/jerry_collette_political.html |author=Jerry Collette |title=Jerry Collete, Libertarian Political Activist |accessdate=2008-03-05] , notably Ron Paul's 2008 Presidential campaign [cite news
last = Vogel
first = Kenneth P.
coauthors =
title = Ron Paul blimp charts unprecedented course
work =
pages =
language = English
publisher = The Politico
date = December 7, 2007
url = http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B11BFC08-3048-5C12-002D031597976477
accessdate = 2008-03-05] , before beginning work with the Republic of Lakotah. Collette has, as attorney general for the movement, made connections with Liberty Dollar and the Sovereign Citizen Movement-aligned group [Cite web |url=http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/Little_Shell.asp?LEARN_Cat=Extremism&LEARN_SubCat=Extremism_in_America&xpicked=3&item=little_shell |title=Extremism in American: Little Shell |publisher=Anti-Defamation League |accessdate=2008-03-05] of the Little Shell Pembina band.

While Canupa Gluha Mani was a member of the Lakota Freedom Delegation, he objected to the declaration of the Republic of Lakotah on the grounds that as the tradtional Lakota system of government continued, no new establishment was necessary and the idea of a "republic" was not a Lakota form of government. [cite web|url= http://www.lakotaoyate.net/history.html|publisher=Lakota Oyate|accessdate=2008-01-04|title=History] Members of the Republic of Lakotah have since denounced Canupa Gluha Manicite web |url=http://www.dlncoalition.org/lakotahfreedom.htm |title=Lakotah Freedom News |accessdate=2008-03-29] but Canupa Gluha Mani has declared himself an independent member of the Republic of Lakotah.cite interview |last= |first= |subject=Canupa Gluha Mani |subjectlink= |last2= |first2= |subject2= |subjectlink2= |last3= |first3= |subject3= |subjectlink3= |last4= |subject4= |interviewer=Joyce Riley |cointerviewers=David vonKleist |title= |type= |url= |format= |program=The Power Hour |callsign= |city= |date=March 28, 2008 |year= |month= |accessdate= ] Canupa Gluha Mani, along with former Lakota Freedom Delegation publicity coordinator Naomi Archer, operate the Lakota Oyate website, which claims that it represents the legitimate successor of the Lakota Freedom Movement.cite web|title=Contact|url= http://www.lakotaoyate.net/contact.html|publisher=Lakota Oyate|accessdate=2008-01-06]

Both factions have repudiated the former violent means of some of their members. Canupa Gluha Mani has stated "this is not an armed struggle, this is not an armed conflict"cite podcast |url=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/SHAUNOMACRADIO/2007/12/22/SHAUN-OMAC-RADIO-News-and-Comment |title=Interview with Canupa Gluha Mani |date=2007-12-22 |host=Shaun OMac |website=Blogtalkradio |accessdate=2008-01-15] while Russell Means calls the violent means used by some of its members in the past, such as during the Wounded Knee incident, "idiocy, and thank goodness we didn't follow up on it".

Both factions also say Lakotah's declaration of sovereignty comes after a thirty-three year preparatory period in which the legalities of treaty withdrawal were thoroughly explored, following the 1974 Oglala Declaration of Continuing Independence. [cite news|url=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVC1KMTOgwiSoMQyT2LwZc9HyAgA|title=Descendants of Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse break away from US|publisher=Agence France Presse|date=2007-12-19|accessdate=2007-12-31]

Assertion of independence

The Lakota Freedom Delegation traveled to Washington, D.C. and contacted the United States Department of State, announcing that the Lakota were unilaterally withdrawing from the several treaties between themselves and the United States government. The delegation presented a letter, dated December 17 2007 and signed by longtime Indian activists Russell Means, Garry Rowland, Duane Martin Sr. also called Canupa Gluha Mani, and Phyllis Young, which declared the Lakota to be "predecessor sovereign of Dakota Territory" and cited gross violations of the treaties between the Lakota and the United States as the immediate cause for withdrawal. The letter also invited the United States government to enter into negotiations with the newly-declared entity, there identified only as "Lakotah." It threatened that if good-faith negotiations were not begun then "Lakotah will begin to administer liens against real estate transactions within the five state area of Lakotah."cite press release|url=http://www.republicoflakotah.com/Treaty/121707withdrawal.pdf |title=Lakotah Unilateral Withdrawal from All Agreements and Treaties with the United States of America |date-2007-12-17 |accessdate=2008-01-05 |publisher=Lakota Freedom Delegation|format=PDF]

The group also has pursued international recognition for the Lakotah at the embassies of Venezuela, Bolivia, Chile, and South Africa and has claimed that Ireland and East Timor are "very interested" in Lakotah's declaration and that they expect recognition from Russia. Russell Means has made reference to Finland and Iceland as well. [cite news|url=http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2007/12/20/news/local/doc476a99630633e335271152.txt|title=Lakota Sioux Secede From US, Declare Independence |author=Bill Harlan|publisher=Rapid City Journal|date=2007-12-20|accessdate=2007-12-31] However, none of these nations have publicly announced recognition for Lakotah.

Legal basis for independence

Supporters of Lakotah argue that their assertion of sovereignty is entirely legal under "Natural, International and United States law"cite web|url= http://www.republicoflakotah.com/media.htm|title=Media|publisher=Republic of Lakotah|accessdate=2007-12-31] . The group emphasizes that the Republic's establishment comes from a "withdrawal" from the United States, not a secession.

They argue that as an Indian tribe in the United States, the Lakota were already and always have been a sovereign nation as guaranteed under Article Six of the United States Constitution, bound to the United States Federal Government by treaty. As such, the legal basis of such a state's independence is argued to be the Lakota nation's withdrawal from the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) and the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) and the rejection of all United States federal laws, executive orders, and other government acts since then, in particular rejecting the Major Crimes Act, the General Allotment Act, the Citizenship Act of 1924, the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, the Indian Claims Commission Act, Public Law 280 and the Termination Act.

The group claims its authority to assert independence derives from a long period of discussion and preparation involving a number of traditional chiefs and tribal councils representing the following Indian reservations and communities:
*Pine Ridge Indian Reservation
*Porcupine, South Dakota
*Kyle, South Dakota
*Rosebud Indian Reservation
*Lower Brule Indian Reservation
*Cheyenne River Indian Reservation
*Standing Rock Indian Reservation
*Flandreau Indian Reservationcite web|url=http://www.republicoflakotah.com/history.htm|title=History| publisher=Republic of Lakotah|accessdate=2007-12-31] cite web|url= http://www.lakotaoyate.net/history.html|title=History|publisher=Lakota Oyate|accessdate=2008-01-03]

The group also claims the right to withdraw, on behalf of the Lakota people, from the Treaties of Fort Laramie as a consequence of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Members argue that the decision in the case of "Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock", 187 U.S. 553 (1903) shows that the United States Government does not adequately protect Indian rights. Means also cites the Enabling Act of 1889, stating that clauses protecting Indian sovereignty on the lands comprising the states where the Lakota historically reside have been ignored.

In a 15 January 2008 news release, the Republic of Lakotah proposed that independence from the United States might follow a Compact of Free Association and suggested that the independence process could resemble that of the Philippines, Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia or the Marshall Islands.

Russell Means has also stated that he intends to treat the result of the 2008 Pine Ridge Reservation Presidential election, in which he is a candidate, [cite web |url=http://www.russellmeansfreedom.com/ |title=Russell Means for President of Pine Ridge Sioux Indian Reservation |accessdate=2008-04-03] as a "plebiscite/referendum" on Lakota independence. [cite podcast
url =http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7SYMGyWdDk
title =Russell Means Freedom Part 1
website =YouTube
host =Russell Means
date =April 2, 2008
accessdate =2008-04-03
accessyear =2008]

Motivations for independence

Lakotah's founders cite the Oglala 1974 Declaration of Continuing Independence:

The groups cite several reasons for its assertion of sovereignty, all connected what they refer to as the "colonial apartheid" of the reservation system in the United States. The group claims that control by the United States has led to massive unemployment, poverty and disease among the Lakota people and also alleges that 150 years of US administration is responsible for the statistical poverty of Lakota lands. The group claims that withdrawal from the United States will reverse these problems as well as help reestablish the Lakota language and culture. [cite web|url=http://www.republicoflakotah.com/why.htm|title=Why|publisher=Republic of Lakotah|accessdate=2007-12-31] [cite web|url=http://www.lakotaoyate.net/why.html|title=Why|publisher=Lakota Oyate|accessdate=2008-01-03] The group also claims persistent violations by the United States of their treaties with the Lakota.

Another longstanding point of contention between the Lakota and the United States is the status of the Black Hills of South Dakota, which were part of Sioux reservation lands until they were taken without compensation by the US government and opened for gold mining following the collapse of the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868). In 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court decision "United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians" awarded $105 million to eight tribes of Sioux Indians as compensation ($17.1 million for the market value of the land in 1877 and $88 million in 5% per annum simple interest between 1877 and 1980), [cite web|url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=448&page=371|title= UNITED STATES v. SIOUX NATION OF INDIANS, 448 U.S. 371 (1980)|publisher=FindLaw|accessdate=2008-06-13] but the court did not award land. The tribal governments of the Lakota has refused the settlement, and as interest accrues, the unclaimed award is approaching $1 billion. [cite web|url=http://worldmeets.us/lemonde0000166.shtml|title=Sioux Indians of Lakota Tribe Tell State Dept. of Succession|publisher=Le Monde|accessdate=2008-04-29]

upport and reactions

The extent of popular support among the Lakota people for Lakotah is unclear. Russell Means and Canupa Gluha Mani have claimed that some 13,000 Lakota, including 77% of the population of Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, have shown support for the Republic of Lakotah, and that the eight-member delegation which traveled to Washington, D.C. was only a portion of some seventy-seven tribal elders and activists taking part in the movement.cite interview|url=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/hrr/2007/12/22/Russell-Means- |date=2007-12-22 |accessdate=2008-01-05 |program=Heading Right |interviewer=Ed Morissey |last=Means |first=Russell |subjectlink=Russell Means |callsign=Blogtalkradio] cite podcast |url=http://memes.org/audio-interview-canupa-gluha-mani-lakota-freedom-delegation |title=Interview with Canupa Gluha Mani - Lakota Freedom Delegation |date=2007-12-25 |host=Juxtaposeur |website= [http://memes.org Mind Viruses] ] However, Rapid City Journal reporter Bill Harlan reported on his blog that "most folks I talk to hadn’t heard about the declaration. The ones who had heard the news, to a person, did not want to talk about it on the record." [cite web|url=http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/politicalblog/?p=2381|title=Lakota Nation: no taxes!|author=Bill Harlan| publisher=Mount Blogmore, the Rapid City Journal Politlcal Blog|date=2007-12-21|accessdate=2008-01-01] The Journal has also noted that "there were no tribal presidents in the group which made the announcement, no one from the top ranks of any of the Lakota Sioux tribes." [cite web|url=http://rapidcityjournal.com/blogs/editor/?p=339|author=Mikel LeFort|title= Lakota announcement: Where does it go?|publisher=Typos and Tribulations: Behind the headlines with a Rapid City Journal editor|date=2007-01-20|accessdate=2008-01-01] Nanwica Kciji, an Oglala Lakota and first president of the Native American Journalists Association, has also discredited the December 2007 developments, arguing that the Lakotah Freedom Delegation "never considered that treaties are made between nations and not individuals." [cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tim-giago/catering-to-that-10-perce_b_79241.html|title=Catering to That 10 Percent That Love to be Mascots|accessdate=2008-01-07|author=Tim Giago]

The Alaskan Independence Party, in an announcement dated December 21 2007, "applauded" the independent Lakota nation and granted it "full recognition". [cite web |url=http://www.akip.org/lakota.html |author=Lynette Clark |title=Alaskan Independence Party | date=2007-12-21 |accessdate=2008-01-18 ] The secessionist movement Second Vermont Republic has also announced its support, and encouraged other American Indian groups to similarly declare independence from the United States. [cite web |url=http://vermontrepublic.org/news_events/lakota_independence_resolution |title=Lakota Independence Resolution |date=15 January 2008 |accessdate=2008-01-23 |publiser=Second Vermont Republic

Response from recognized Native American governments

The official tribal governments of the Lakota have had mixed reactions, though none have yet adopted either faction's program.

Rodney Bordeaux, chairman of the Rosebud Sioux, said that Rosebud Indian Reservation has no interest in joining the Republic of Lakotah and said that the Lakota Freedom Delegation never presented their plan to the tribal council.cite news|url=http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071220/NEWS/712200347|title= Lakota group pushes for new nation|author=Faith Bremner|publisher=Argus Leader|date=2007-12-20|accessdate=2007-12-31] Bordeaux stated that the group does not represent the Lakota people nor the support of the elected tribal governments. However, he did say that Russell Means "made some good points".

Joseph Brings Plenty, chairman of the Cheyenne River Lakota, agreed that the Lakota Freedom Delegation "are not representative of the nation I represent" but would not say whether he agreed or disagreed with their goals and message, noting some value in the group's actions in raising awareness for the history of the Lakota people.

Conversely, Avis Little Eagle, the vice-chairwoman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council, has said that the Council of Standing Rock Reservation will consider Russell Means's letter. [cite news|url= http://www.grandforksherald.com/articles/index.cfm?id=61908&section=news|title=Standing Rock official: Council to consider treaty pullout|publisher=Grand Forks Herald|author=Mike Nowatzki|date=2007-12-28|accessdate=2008-01-01]

Charmaine White Face, speaking for the Teton Sioux Treaty Council, has announced: blockquote|There is a provision within the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 that our ancestors, including my great-great grandparents, had included. Article 12 says the Treaty of 1868 could not be changed except by three-fourths of the adult male vote. This was done expressly to protect the people, the land, and our way of life. What are now called reservations, were originally created as prisoner of war camps by the USA when they invaded our territory. We are living as an occupied nation similar to the situation in Iraq where the USA imposes its own form of government.

In the late 1870s, two other leaders, Spotted Tail and Red Cloud, were coerced into trying to change the 1868 Treaty by the USA. Even though they eventually signed what the US wanted, they also knew that without three-fourths of the adult male approval, the 1868 Treaty could not be changed. Russell Means is only one man and has not received the three-fourths adult male approval. However, Russell Means' efforts remind the world that we still have an international treaty with the USA.cite web |url=http://www.defendblackhills.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=120&Itemid=1 |title=In response to the Press Release by Russell Means |author=Charmaine White Face |accessdate=2008-01-20 ]

International response

Internationally, according to Russell Means, Venezuela's ambassador to the United States has stated to the group that his country cannot recognize Lakotah's independence based on Venezuela's interpretation of what Lakotah is doing.

In February 2008, the Lakotah Freedom Delegation (including Means) handed over a formal petition, asking to recognize the Republic of Lakotah, to the embassies of Russia, Serbia, Bolivia, Venezuela, the Republic of South Africa, Ireland, France, Nicaragua, East Timor, Chile, Turkey, India, Finland, Iceland and Uruguay. The text of the petition is available online. [ [http://www.republicoflakotah.com/docs/Petition.pdf untitled ] ]

US Government response

The United States Department of State is referring queries on the subject of Lakotah to the United States Department of the Interior, which oversees the Bureau of Indian Affairs. ["For your query, we will refer you to the Department of the Interior. This is not a State Department issue." Kirsten Petree, Director, Office of Media Affairs, U.S. Department of State, private communication with (December 21 2007)]

Gary Garrison of the BIA said that the group's withdrawal "doesn't mean anything". "These are not legitimate tribal governments elected by the people ... when they begin the process of violating other people's rights, breaking the law, they're going to end up like all the other groups that have declared themselves independent - usually getting arrested and being put in jail".cite news |url=http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096416411 |title=Withdrawal from US treaties enjoys little support from tribal leaders |author=Gale Courey Toensing |publiser=Indian Country Today |date=2008-01-04 |accessdate=2008-01-04]

Russell Means, on the subject of what the Republic of Lakotah expects the Federal Government reponse to be, has stated that "I don't expect the federal government to do anything. I don't believe they even know what to do."

References

External links

Wikinewshas |related stories|
*
*
*
*
* [http://www.republicoflakotah.com/ Republic of Lakotah]
* [http://www.lakotaoyate.net/ Lakota Oyate]
*YouTube|Hm0JIgVHypQ|Russell Means discussing the Republic of Lakotah
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/24/AR2008062401162.html?nav=rss_email/components "Ways and Means" By Bill Donahue, Washington Post]