- Swift v. Tyson
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Swift v. Tyson
ArgueDate=
ArgueYear=
DecideDate=January 25
DecideYear=1842
FullName=John Swift v. George W. Tyson
USVol=41
USPage=1
Citation=10 L. Ed. 865; 1842 U.S. LEXIS 345
Prior=On a certificate of division from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
Subsequent=
Holding=Federal courts were to create and apply a federal common law in diversity cases.
SCOTUS=1842-1843
Majority=Story
JoinMajority="unanimous"
Concurrence=
JoinConcurrence=
Concurrence2=
JoinConcurrence2=
Concurrence/Dissent=Catron
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
Dissent=
JoinDissent=
Dissent2=
JoinDissent2=
LawsApplied=
Overruled="Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins ", ussc|304|64|1938 "Swift v. Tyson", 41 U.S. 1 (
1842 )ref|citation, was a case in which theUnited States Supreme Court determined thatUnited States federal courts hearing cases brought under theirdiversity jurisdiction must apply the "statutory" law of the states when the state's legislature had spoken on the issue but did not have to apply the state'scommon law . The Supreme Court's decision essentially said that federal courts, when deciding matters not specifically addressed by the state's legislature, had the authority to develop afederal common law .This case has been criticized by some as an example of forum shopping because the facts of the case involved the quintessence of the need for a uniform nation wide rule, the handling of negotiable instruments—and the fact that most of the states have subscribed to the
Uniform Commercial Code 's Article 5 shows us that it did. The problem was that the "rule in "Swift" was extended by later judges to cover all of common law and not just that of commercial paper, bank notes, bankers acceptances and other forms of "near money."This decision resulted in
forum shopping , whereinplaintiffs would file their cases in federal as opposed to state courts in order to have a different law applied. This was seen to result in manipulation of the federal court system and was eventually overturned in "Erie Railroad v. Tompkins ", 304 U.S. 64 (1938 ).ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 41 External links
* caselaw source
case="Swift v. Tyson", 41 U.S. 1 (1842)
enfacto=http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./41/1/
findlaw=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=41&page=1
* [http://www.agh-attorneys.com/4_swift_v_tyson.htm Modernized reading of the case]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.