- Per curiam decision
In
law , a per curiam decision (or opinion or per curiam) is a ruling issued by anappellate court with multiplejudge s in which the decision rendered was made by thecourt acting as a whole.cite book|title=Black's Law Dictionary|editor=Bryan A. Garner|publisher=West Group|location=St. Paul, MN|date=2001|edition=2nd Pocket Edition|pages=503, 523] In contrast to regular opinions, the decision does not list the individual judge responsible for authoring the decision. However, "per curiam" decisions are not the only type of decision that can reflect the opinion of the court; other types of decisions such asunanimous decision s can also reflect the opinion of the court as a whole, even if not issued in "per curiam" form. TheLatin term translates as "by the court as a whole".United States
The decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court are usually not "per curiam".cite web|url=http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/per_curiam|title=Per curiam|work=Wex|publisher=Cornell University Law School|accessdate=2008-09-10] Their decisions more commonly take the form of one or more opinions signed by individual justices which are then joined in by other justices. Unanimous and signed opinions are not considered "per curiam" decisions, as only the court can officially designate opinions as "per curiam". "Per curiam" decisions tend to be brief in length, and usually deal with relatively non-controversial issues. The designation is stated at the beginning of the opinion.
Examples
* "
Hayburn's Case ", ussc|2|409|1792
* "Ex parte Quirin ", ussc|317|1|1942
* "Ray v. Blair ", ussc|343|214|1952
* "Toolson v. New York Yankees ", ussc|346|356|1953
* "One, Inc. v. Olesen ", ussc|355|371|1958
* "Brandenburg v. Ohio ", ussc|395|444|1969
* "New York Times Co. v. United States ", ussc|403|713|1971
* "Furman v. Georgia ", ussc|408|238|1972
* "Buckley v. Valeo ", ussc|424|1|1976
* "Bush v. Gore ", ussc|531|98|2000ee also
*
By the Court opinions of the Supreme Court of Canada References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.