- Pure economic loss (England and Wales)
Pure economic loss in English law, arising from
negligence has traditionally been limited. Notably, recovery for losses that are "purely economic" arise under theFatal Accidents Act 1976 ; and for negligent misstatements, as stated in "Hedley Byrne v. Heller ". Economic loss generally refers to financial detriment that can be seen on a balance sheet but not physically. Economic loss is then divided into "consequential economic loss" - that which arises directly from some physical damage or injury (e.g. loss of earnings from having your arm cut off) and "pure economic loss", which is everything other.The fear behind allowing claims for "pure economic loss" is that potentially unlimited claims could flood in. The risks may be unknowable, and parties would find it impossible to insure. ["Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co." [1992] 1 SCR 1021 (Canada), "per" McLachlan J] [Bishop (1982)] The
U.S. judge Benjamin N. Cardozo famously described it as, "liability in an indeterminate amount, for an indeterminate time, to an indeterminate class". ["Ultramares v. Touche" 174 N.E 441, 444 (N.Y. 1931) (USA)]Examples of pure economic loss include:
*Loss of income suffered by a family whose principal earner dies in an accident. The physical injury is caused to the deceased, not the family. [" [http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1808/J92.html Baker v. Bolton] " (1808) 1 Camp 493 (England and Wales)]
*Loss of market value of a property owing to the inadequate specifications of foundations by anarchitect . [" [http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1991/2.html Murphy v. Brentwood District Council] " [1991] 1 AC 398 (England and Wales)] ["Sutherland Shire Council v. Heyman" (1985) 60 ALR 1, at 60-61 (Australia)] ["Winnipeg Condominium Corporation No.36 v. Bird Construction Co." [1995] 1 SCR 85 (Canada)]
*Loss of production suffered by an enterprise whose electricity supply is interrupted by a contractor excavating a public utility.The latter case is exemplified by the case of "
Spartan Steel and Alloys Ltd v. Martin & Co. Ltd ". [ [1973] QB 27] Similar losses are also restricted inGerman law [van Gerven (2001) "pp"187-188] though not inFrench law . [van Gerven (2001) "pp"198-199]References
Bibliography
* cite journal | title=Economic loss in tort | author=Bishop, W. | journal=Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | volume=2 | year=1982 | pages=1–29 | doi=10.1093/ojls/2.1.1
* cite journal | author=Giliker, P. | year=2005 | title=Revisiting pure economic loss: lessons to be learnt from the Supreme Court of Canada? | journal=Legal Studies | volume=25 | pages=49–71 | doi=10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00270.x
* cite book | pages="pp" 339-423 | author=Lunney, M. & Oliphant, K. | title=Tort Law: Text and Materials | edition=2nd ed. | publisher=Oxford University Press | location=Oxford | id=ISBN 0-19-926055-9
* cite journal | author=Stapleton, J. | title=Duty of care and economic loss: a wider agenda | journal=Law Quarterly Review | year=1991 | volume=107 | pages=249
* cite journal | author=— | title=Pure economic loss: lessons from case-law-focused 'middle theory' | year=2002 | journal=UCLA Law Review | volume=50 | pages=531
* cite book | author=van Gerven, W. "et al." (eds) | title=Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Tort Law | year=2001 | location=Oxford | publisher=Hart Publishing | id=ISBN 1841131393
*Weinrib, E. J. (2005) "The disintegration of duty", in Madden, M. S. "Exploring Tort Law", London: Cambridge University Press, "pp"143-272 ISBN 052185136X
* cite book | pages="pp" 339-423 | author=Lunney, M. & Oliphant, K. | title=Tort Law: Text and Materials | edition=2nd ed. | publisher=Oxford University Press | location=Oxford | id=ISBN 0-19-926055-9
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.