- Stone of Tmutarakan
The Stone of Tmutarakan (Russian: Тмутараканский камень) is a marble slab engraved with the words "In the year 6576 [A.M., 1068 A.D] the sixth of the
Indiction , Prince Gleb measured across the sea on the ice fromTmutarakan toKerch 14,000 sazhen" («В лето 6576 индикта 6 Глеб князь мерил море по леду от Тмутороканя до Корчева 14000 сажен»).A
sazhen , an old Rus unit of length, was equal to seven feet (or roughly correspoding to afathom ); thus theKerch Straits , according to the stone, were 88,000 feet or 18.5 miles across (that is, from Kerch toTmutarakan — the straits themselves are only 4.5 miles wide at their narrowest, but from site of Tmutarakan to modern-day Kerch is about 15 miles.) The tenth-centuryByzantine EmperorConstantine Porphyrogenitus wrote that the straits were the equivalent of 18 miles across, [Brian J. Boeck, "Stone of Contention: Medieval Tmutarakan as a Measure of Soviet Archaeology in the 1950s and 1960s," "Ruthenica" 4 (2005), p. 39.] and this may explain why that measurement appears on the stone, although it is unclear if an eleventh century prince in Rus would have had access to that information; this uncertainty calls the stone's authenticity into question.The Prince Gleb referred to in the inscription was Gleb Svyatoslavich, then prince of Tmutarakan. Gleb was later Prince of
Novgorod the Great , where he saved Bishop Fedor's life by chopping a sorcerer in half who led a pagan uprising against the bishop. Gleb was eventually killed fighting pagan Finnic tribes in the northern Novgorodian Lands ("the Zavoloch'e" or "Za Volokom", "the Land Beyond the Portages") on May 30, 1079. [А. N. Nasonov, ed., "Novgorodskaia Pervaia Letopis Starshego i Mladshego Izvodov" (Moscow and Leningrad: AN SSSR, 1950), 18, 201; Janet Martin, "Medieval Russia 980-1584" (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 44.]The stone was discovered on the
Taman Peninsula just east ofCrimea in 1792 and the inscription was first published in 1794 byAleksei Musin-Pushkin . The study of the inscription is said to be the firstepigraphic study in Russian history. In spite of its importance in the history of Russian epigraphy, a number of scholars have called the stone's provenance into question and consider the stone an eighteenth century forgery, perhaps done by Romanticists enamored of ancient culture or even as an effort to find precedent for Russian involvement in theCaucasus . [See Boeck, "Stone of Contention," 33, 38-9; Idem, Minnesota and. Kievan Rus," "Russian History" 32, 3-4: V. A. Zakharov, "Zametki o Tmutarakanskom Kamene," in "SRIO", 2002, 4 (152), pp. 154-178.] The stone is currently housed in theState Hermitage Museum inSt Petersburg .References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.