Lazarus and Dives

Dives and Lazarus or Lazarus and Dives is a narrative [Whether this account is a metaphor, parable, or biography is a matter of contention among Christians.] attributed to Jesus that is reported only in the Gospel of Luke (

Early Christianity

Hippolytus of Rome (ca. AD 200) describes Hades with similar details: the bosom of Abraham for the souls of the righteous, fiery torment for the souls of wicked, and a chasm between them [ [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0520.htm Against Plato, On the Cause of the Universe] ] . He equates the fires of Hades with the lake of fire described in the Book of Revelation, but specifies that no one will actually be cast into the fire until the end times.

Medieval tradition

The story was frequently told in an elaborated form in the Medieval period, and, as the story was believed to be factual rather than a parable, Lazarus was venerated as a patron saint of lepers by the Roman Catholic Church. [ [http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintl41.htm Lazarus] on the Catholic Community Forum.] In the twelfth century, crusaders in the Kingdom of Jerusalem founded the Order of Saint Lazarus.

It was often shown in art, especially carved at the portals of churches, at the foot of which beggars would sit (for example at Moissac and Saint-Sernin, Toulouse), promoting their cause. There is a surviving stained-glass window at Bourges Cathedral. [Emile Male, The Gothic Image , Religious Art in France of the Thirteen Century, p 200, English trans of 3rd edn, 1913, Collins, London (and many other editions)]

Chaucer's Summoner observes that "Dives and Lazarus lived differently, and their rewards were different." [ [http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~chaucer/teachslf/sumt-par.htm The Summoners's Prologue and Tale ] , line 1877 - "Lazar and Dives lyveden diversly, And divers gerdon hadden they therby."]

In song

Richard Crashaw wrote a metaphysical stanza for his "Steps to the Temple" in 1646 entitled, "Upon Lazarus His Tears"::"Rich Lazarus! richer in those gems, thy tears,::Than Dives in the robes he wears::He scorns them now, but oh they'll suit full well::With the purple he must wear in hell."

The story appeared as an English folk song (oldest written documentation from 1557 [Francis James Child, "The English and Scottish popular Ballads", Part IV, 1886; referring to (inter alia) "Arber, Registers of the Company of Stationers"] ), with the depiction of the afterlife altered to fit Christian tradition. The song was also published as the Child ballad Dives and Lazarus in the 19th century. [cite web
last = anonymous; from Child ballad 56 A, from Sylvester: "a Garland of Christmas Carols", from an old Birmingham broadside
url = http://www.bartleby.com/243/109.html
title = Dives and Lazarus
work = The Oxford Book of Ballads, 1910
publisher = Bartleby.com
accessdate = 2006-06-29] North American slaves sang a spiritual about Lazarus and Dives. [cite web
url = http://www.crescendoalpesto.ch/repertoire/lazarus.htm
title = Poor man Lazarus
work = Repertoire
publisher = crescendoalpesto.ch
accessdate = 2006-06-29]

In 1939, Ralph Vaughan Williams based his orchestral piece Five Variants of Dives and Lazarus on the song.

Both names appear in Edith Sitwell's poem "Still falls the Rain" from "The Canticle of the Rose", first published in 1941. It was written after the raids on London in 1940. The poem is dark, full of the disillusions of World War II. It speaks of the failure of man, and of the yet unconditional love of God.

Benjamin Britten set Sitwell's text to music in his third Canticle in a series of five. The names appear in Verse IV: "Still falls the Rain At the feet of the Starved Man hung upon the Cross. Christ that each day, each night, nails there, have mercy on us. On Dives and on Lazarus: Under the Rain the sore and the gold are as one." The setting clearly depicts the common suffering of both sinner and saint, especially during a time of war.

Interpretations

The parable illustrates a theme common to several of Jesus's parables: the treatment of the least of society is the true measure of piety. The rich man's claims to external virtue and "legal" satisfaction could not compensate for his neglect of the poor man. Jesus taught, repeatedly, that the Kingdom of God is within the soul and not in the law, in contrast to the Pharisean understanding of the Messiah.

What makes this parable even more poignant is that the author of the Gospel is apparently also the author of the Acts of the Apostles, which relates the events after the Resurrection (or at very least, is aware of the resurrection). The readers are aware that not only do they have the words of Moses and the Prophets but that someone returned from death, too. Further, for early Christians, the parable answers the question of why, after the resurrection, Jesus did not preach and give new warnings to the living.

The parable is unique in that, unlike others where Jesus referred to the characters as "a certain man", "a sower", etc., one of the characters was referred to by name. There is a minority view which holds that, because of this, the story isn't a parable, but a reference to a real beggar named Lazarus and a real wealthy individual.

Afterlife doctrine

Christians debate what the story says about the afterlife. Most Christians believe in particular judgment and see the story as consistent with it. Eastern Orthodox Christians see the story as consistent with their belief in Hades, where the righteous and unrighteous alike await the resurrection of the dead. (The word translated as Hell in the story is Hades which means the physical grave.) Western Christians usually interpret Lazarus as being in Heaven or Limbo and the rich man in Hell.

Instead of particular judgment, some Christians believe in soul sleep and general judgment only. Proponents of general judgment, for example Seventh-day Adventists and Christian Universalists, argue that this is a parable referring to Jewish and Gentile views of the Messiah. Other advocates of general judgment simply say that it is a parable that is devoted to morality, not the afterlife.

In the secular view, the story represents the 1st-century Jewish belief in Sheol ("Hades" in Greek, as in this passage, meaning simply the grave). Sheol is where all the dead go. In Sheol, the dead are unaware of their situation. Some among the Jews believed in the hope of the resurrection from the dead, others believed death was final. In sheol there is no pleasure or pain as the dead can experience neither ["For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten" (ECC 9:5) and "Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest" ECC 9-10]

In popular culture

Dives is also called Diversus in some versions, such as that performed by Steeleye Span on their album "They Called Her Babylon".

The Christian metal band Whitecross performed a song called "No Second Chances" telling the story of Lazarus the beggar.

In his novel, Moby Dick, Herman Melville alludes to Lazarus and Dives in Chapter Two as part of a metaphor describing a cold night in New Bedford. (cite book | title=Moby Dick | last=Melville | first=Herman | pages=pp. 11-12)

Views of historicity

There are different views on the historicity and origin of the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus. [Multiple sources summarized at [http://www.faithfutures.org/JDB/jdb471.html Jesus Database] ] The story is unique to Luke and does not appear to come from the putative Q document, and therefore there have been questions about sources.

As a literal, historical event

Some Christians view the story of Lazarus and the Rich Man as an actual event which was related by Jesus to his followers; [e.g. [http://www.bible.ca/su-hades-luke16.htm#mainline Webpage] which argues that Lazarus and the rich man is literally true.] this was generally the view of the medieval Church. According to this view, this story is not a parable but literal biography. Supporters of this view point to the amount of detail in the story. For example, in no other parable does Jesus give a character's name.

As a parable created by Jesus

Most Christians consider that this is a parable created by Jesus and told to his followers. [eg "The IVP Bible Background Commentary", Tom Wright's "Luke for Everyone" and Joachim Jeremias's "The Parables of Jesus" all refers to it as a "Parable"] Proponents of this view argue that the story of Lazarus and the rich man has much in common with other stories which are agreed upon parables, both in language and content (e.g. the reversal of fortunes, the use of antithesis, and concern for the poor).

O. Sellers holds this account as a satirical parable which represents a masterful expose of the Pharisees. Through satire, Jesus effectively strips the Pharisees of any pretense of righteousness and thoroughly discredits their justification for ignoring the poor in Israel. The thought here is that when examining Luke 16:19-31 in the light of history, we note a rather suspicious resemblance between Jesus’ story of The Rich Man and Lazarus, and the traditional teachings of the Pharisees. Sellers' concludes that Jesus was not setting out to confirm Pharisaic beliefs about the afterlife. True, he told their story; the same story they had told a thousand times before, but with one important difference; a rather ironic twist you might say, that sees the Rich Man waking up in torment in Hades and being denied the slightest assistance by application of the same logic whereby he had regularly denied the poor and destitute while on earth. It would not take much imagination to visualize the headlines in the Jerusalem Gazette the morning after Jesus told His version of their story, humorously conveying how the Lord had turned the tables on the Pharisees in the afterlife.

As a mixture of Jesus and early Christian material

A third view says that the bulk of the parable was told by Jesus but was supplemented with later additions of material composed by others after Jesus' crucifixion. In this view, the early part of the story (Luke 16:19-26) is a parable told by Jesus, while the concluding verses (27-31) represent material added to the story by early Christians. In these verses, the rich man requests Lazarus be raised from the dead so as to serve as warning to the rich man's living brothers. For proponents of interpolation, this is an allegorical reference to the rejection of early Christianity by mainstream Judaism.Fact|date=March 2007

As originated by Luke

A fourth view holds that the story was not told by Jesus. Proponents of this view suggest that it is significant that only the Gospel of Luke mentions Jesus telling the story (see Synoptic Gospels). The story fits well with Luke's emphasis on care for the poor and therefore they suggest that it may be an authorial insertion.Fact|date=March 2007

ee also

*Lazaretto
*List of names for the Biblical nameless

External links

* [http://tentmaker.org/books/Lazarus.html An In-Depth Look at the Rich Man and Lazarus from a Universalist Perspective]
* [http://www.tentmaker.org/articles/Lazarus-byHuie.htm A second In-Depth Look of the meaning of the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus]

References