VLSI Technology

Infobox_Company
company_name = VLSI Technology, Inc.
company_
company_type = Subsidiary
foundation = 1979
location = San Jose, California
industry = VLSI Embedded Systems Application-specific integrated circuit
owner = Philips Electronics (Since June 1999)

VLSI Technology, Inc was a company which designed and manufactured custom and semi-custom ICs. The company was based in Silicon Valley, with headquarters at 1109 McKay Drive in San Jose, California. Along with LSI Logic, VLSI Technology defined the leading edge of the application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) business, which accelerated the push of powerful embedded systems into affordable products.

The company was founded in 1979 by a trio from Fairchild Semiconductor by way of Synertek - Jack Balletto, Dan Floyd, Gunnar Wetlesen - and by Doug Fairbairn of Xerox PARC and Lambda (later VLSI Design) magazine.

Alfred J. Stein became the CEO of the company in 1982. Subsequently VLSI built its first fab in San Jose; eventually a second fab was built in San Antonio, Texas.

VLSI had its initial public offering in 1983, and was listed on the stock market as (nasdaq2|VLSI).

Advanced tools for VLSI design

Thanks to its Xerox PARC heritage, VLSI was an important pioneer in the electronic design automation industry. It offered a sophisticated package of tools, originally based on the 'lambda-based' design style advocated by Carver Mead and Lynn Conway.

VLSI became the an early vendor of standard cell (cell-based technology) to the merchant market in the late 80s where the other ASIC-focused company, LSI Logic, focused on gate arrays. Prior to VLSI's cell-based offering, the technology had been primarily available only within large vertically integrated companies with semiconductor units such as AT&T and IBM.

VLSI's design tools eventually included not only design entry and simulation but eventually cell-based routing (chip compiler), a datapath compiler, and a state machine compiler. Few companies could match a few of these tools and none could match the breadth of VLSI's offering.

Unfortunately, for all VLSI's competence in design tools, they were a laggard in their semiconductor technology. VLSI's 1.5 µm technology was far from industry leading in either performance or density and VLSI had done virtually no work in developing a 1.0 µm library as the rest of the industry moved to that geometry in the late 80s. At the 11th hour (some would say 13th hour) VLSI struck a deal with Hitachi and finally released a 1.0 µm library (actually more of a 1.2 µm library with a 1.0 µm gate).

As VLSI struggled to gain parity with the rest of the industry in semiconductor technology, the clock was ticking on the viability of design tools tied to a single fab. Cadence was dominating physical design and Synopsys was dominating the exploding field of design synthesis. As VLSI's tools were being eclipsed, VLSI waited too long to open the tools up to other fabs and Compass Design Automation was never a viable competitor to industy leaders.

Meanwhile, VLSI poorly timed its entry into the mercant high speed SRAM market previously owned by Cypress and IDT as all the large semiconductor companies built high speed SRAMs with cost structures VLSI could never match. VLSI quickly withdrew taking a huge loss.

Similarly, VLSI sat on the early Acorn processor technology for years without even investing in a working C compiler. ARM Ltd was formed in 1990 and VLSI became just one vendor of the powerful ARM processor after ARM finally funded their own tools. Lack of funding had squandered VLSI's years of monopoly of the Acorn RISC machine.

Only in PC chipsets, did VLSI dominate in the early 90s. This had been a minimally supported product developed by five engineers that led to a huge business for VLSI that almost equaled its ASIC business in revenue (much more profitable initially) but VLSI eventually ceded the market to Intel (VLSI's eventual chipset partner).

VLSI also had an early partnership with PMC, a design group that had been part of British Columbia Bell. Instead of merging with PMC and developing a double poly process, the telecom management at VLSI opted to go it alone. They struggled to design chips as simple as a single T1 LIU in multiple spins (eventually giving up) as PMC eventually merged with Sierra and formed the ultra successful PMC Sierra, one of the most important telecom ASSP vendors in history. Once again, a toxic brew of incompetence let them down.

Scientists and innovations from the 'design technology' part of VLSI found their way to Cadence Design Systems (by way of Redwood Design Automation), Synopsys (by way of Compass Design Automation; was sold to Avant! Corporation, which itself was recently bought by Synopsys.

Global expansion

VLSI maintained operations throughout the USA, and in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan. One of its key sites was in Tempe, Arizona, where a family of highly successful chipsets was developed for the IBM PC.

In 1990, VLSI Technology, along with Acorn Computers and Apple Computer were the founding investing partners in ARM Ltd.

Ericsson of Sweden, after many years of fruitful collaboration, was by 1998 VLSI's largest customer. Within the Wireless Products division, based at Sophia-Antipolis in France, VLSI developed a range of algorithms and circuits for the GSM standard and for cordless standards such as the European DECT and the Japanese PHS. Stimulated by its growth and success in the wireless handset IC area, Philips Electronics acquired VLSI in June 1999, for about $1 billion. The former components survive to this day as part of Philips spin-off NXP Semiconductors

External links

* [http://www.business.com/directory/electronics_and_semiconductors/semiconductors/vlsi_technology,_inc/profile/ Basic corporate information on VLSI Technology]
* [http://semiconductorforums.com Semiconductor Forum for Professionals and VLSI enthusiasts]