- Holden v. Hardy
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Holden v. Hardy
ArgueDate=October 21
ArgueYear=1897
DecideDate=February 28
DecideYear=1898
FullName=Holden v. Hardy, Sheriff
Citation=18 S. Ct. 383; 42 L. Ed. 780; 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1501
USVol=169
USPage=366
Prior=Writ of habeas corpus denied; Holden remanded to custody of Sheriff Hardy
Subsequent=None
Holding=Laws limiting working hours in mines and smelters are a legitimate, constitutional exercise of the state police power, given the inherent danger of such work.
SCOTUS=1898-1902
Majority=Brown
JoinMajority=Fuller, Harlan, Gray, Shiras, White, McKenna
Dissent=Brewer, Peckham
LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. XIV;Utah state law"Holden v. Hardy", 169 U.S. 366 (
1898 ), is a case in which theSupreme Court of the United States upheld a Utah state law limiting the number of work hours for miners and smelters as a legitimate exercise of the police power. The majority held that such a law is legitimate, provided that there is indeed a rational basis, supported by facts, for the legislature to believe particular laws are dangerous. The court was quick to distinguish this from other cases of the era which imposed universal maximum hour rules, which it held unconstitutional under theDue Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 169 External links
* [http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./169/366/ Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898)] (opinion full text).
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.