- Impoundment (political)
Impoundment is the refusal of presidents of the United States to spend money that has been appropriated by the
United States Congress . All of the presidents up toRichard Nixon have used this power, which is regarded as inherent to the office. PresidentThomas Jefferson first used the power of impoundment in 1801. He refused to spend appropriated funds when he impounded $50,000 forUnited States Navy gunboats. He said in 1803 that " [t] he sum of fifty thousand dollars appropriated by Congress for providing gun boats remains unexpended. The favorable and peaceable turn of affairs on the Mississippi rendered an immediate execution of that law unnecessary." [citation
url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Oi9OAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA14&lpg=PA14&dq=%22peaceable+turn+of+affairs+on+the+mississippi+rendered+an+immediate+execution+of+that+law+unnecessary%22&source=web&ots=4SXdFupgfK&sig=1HrE7Uw4pJ1G88x9lOZgHfMhMAo
title=The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States
date=1852
publisher=Gales and Seaton
pages=12-14
accessdate=2007-12-13] In keeping with his efforts to reduce the size of the debt, he left the funds for the ships unspent for over a year.President Nixon used the power of impoundment much more than previous Presidents. In response, Congress passed the
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 , which forbids impoundment. Instead, the president may propose the rescinding of specific funds, but that rescission must be approved by both the House of Representatives and Senate within 45 days. In effect, this has removed the impoundment power, since Congress is not required to vote on the rescission and has ignored the vast majority of presidential requests.In recent years, some citizens and politicians, including most presidents, have called for a
line item veto to strengthen the rescission power and force Congress to vote on the disputed appropriation.Notes
References
*citation
url=http://www.wcl.american.edu/journal/lawrev/47/pdf/brownell.pdf
title=The Unnecessary Demise of the Line Item Veto Act: The Clinton Administration's Costly Failure to Seek Acknowledgement of “National Security Rescission”
author=Roy E. Brownell, II
date=May 1999
publisher=American University Law Review
volume=47
pages=1273-1353
accessdate=2007-12-13
*citation
url=http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju65012.000/hju65012_0f.htm
title=Item Veto Constitutional Amendment — Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives
date=March 23, 2000
publisher=U. S. House of Representatives
accessdate=2007-12-13Further reading
* [http://supreme.justia.com/constitution/article-2/37-impoundment-of-appropriated-funds.html Impoundment of Appropriated Funds] on Justia.com
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.