- Lynne Stewart
Lynne F. Stewart (born
October 8 ,1939 ) is an American radical activist. As anattorney she representedcontroversial and often unpopulardefendant s, includingblack nationalist s, members of the Weather Underground,Mafia figures, and convicted terrorists.In 2005, Stewart was convicted on charges of conspiracy and providing material support to terrorists [ [http://www.thevillager.com/vil_94/lynnestewart.html Lynne Stewart still combative after terror verdict ] ] and sentenced to 28 months in prison. Her felony conviction led to her being automatically disbarred. She was convicted of helping pass messages from her client, Sheikh
Omar Abdel-Rahman , an Egyptian cleric convicted of planning terror attacks, to his followers inal-Gama'a al-Islamiyya , an organization designated as aForeign Terrorist Organization by the United States Secretary of State [ [http://www.tkb.org/Group.jsp?groupID=3760MIPT "Terrorismknowledebase.org"] ] .Education
Stewart was educated at
Hope College ,American University , and graduated with aB.A. in political science fromWagner College . She received a Masters inLibrary Science fromPratt Institute and aJ.D. fromRutgers School of Law-Newark .The Abdel-Rahman case
Stewart was convicted of providing material support (through a press conference and allowing access by her translator) to a terrorist conspiracy to kill persons outside of the United Statesfact|date=July 2008 and conspiring to defraud the U.S. government when acting as counsel to Sheikh
Omar Abdel-Rahman , the blindEgypt ian cleric who was convicted in 1996 of plotting terrorist attacks against various sites in theNew York City area. Specifically, she was accused, in a federal grand jury indictment, of passing Rahman's blessing for a resumption of terrorist operations to his fundamentalist Muslim terrorist cell in Egypt after cell members inquired whether they should continue to honor a ceasefire that was in place against the Egyptian government. [ [http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/November/03_crm_631.htm "Department of Justice"] ] The material support charges were dismissed in the summer of 2003, but in November 2003 Stewart was re-indicted [ [http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/uslstwrt111903sind.html "findlaw.com"] ] on charges of material support to a murder conspiracywhat|date=July 2008, of which she was ultimately convicted.Stewart had accepted the condition that in order to be allowed to meet with Abdel Rahman in prison she would not "use [their] meetings, correspondence, or phone calls with Abdel Rahman to pass messages between third parties (including, but not limited to, the media) and Abdel Rahman".
Stewart claims that the dispute was over one communication on behalf of her client to his supporters via a
Reuters article, followed by a clarification after it appeared to have been misinterpreted. The clarification said: "I [Omar Abdel-Rahman] am not withdrawing my support of the cease-fire, I am merely questioning it and I am urging you, who are on the ground there to discuss it and to include everyone in your discussions as we always have done." [cite web|url=http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/1545229&mode=thread&tid=25|date=2005-02-11|publisher=Democracy Now |title=Convicted Attorney Lynne Stewart: "You Can't Lock Up the Lawyers"|accessdate=2006-10-16]The evidencewhat|date=July 2008 showed that, after Stewart issued the press release, she was told that Rifai Taha, an individual convicted of terrorism in Egypt who was associated with
Osama bin Laden , viewed the press release as support of Taha's desire to return the Islamic Group to violencefact|date=July 2008. Nonetheless, Stewart disseminated another press release, reaffirming Abdel Rahman's withdrawal of support for the ceasefire.fact|date=July 2008At trial, she was represented by
Michael Tigar , a famous defense attorney who also representedTerry Nichols in theOklahoma City Bombing case. Supporters of Stewart alleged that the government charged her for her speech in defending the rights of her client. They believed that Stewart's efforts to release communications from her client were part of an appropriate defense method to gain public awareness and support. They also expressed alarm that wiretaps and hidden cameras authorized by theForeign Intelligence Surveillance Act were used by the Government to gather evidence against her, which they called a violation ofattorney-client privilege . George Soros'Open Society Institute also donated $20,000 to Stewart's legal defense fund in 2002. [Byron York [http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200502170843.asp Soros Funded Stewart Defense] ; National Review]On February 10, 2005, following a nine-month trial and thirteen days of jury deliberations, Stewart was found guilty of conspiracy, providing material support to terrorists and defrauding the U.S. government. Co-defendants
Mohamed Yousry (whose first name is frequently misspelled "Mohammed") andAhmed Sattar were found guilty as charged. [http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/uslstwrt111903sind.html] [ [http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/10/terror.trial.lawyer/ CNN.com - Civil rights attorney convicted in terror trial - Feb 10, 2005 ] ] Her conviction meant automatic disbarment, and onOctober 16 ,2006 , judgeJohn G. Koeltl sentenced Stewart to 28 months in prison. [http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/10/16/terror.trial.ap/index.html] Yousry is free on bail pending appeal but Sattar is serving his sentence at the Federal Supermax prison inFlorence, Colorado .entencing submissions
In a letter to the court dated September 26, 2006, Stewart affirmed that her actions were consistent with how she had always represented her clients, but that she had failed to recognize the difference in a post-2001 America and, in hindsight, should have been more careful to avoid misinterpretation. "I inadvertently allowed those with other agendas to corrupt the most precious and inviolate basis of our profession – the attorney-client relationship." [http://www.lynnestewart.org/Stewart%20Letter%20(Ex%201)%20scanned.pdf] The New York Times reported Stewart "acknowledged [...] that she knowingly violated prison rules and was careless, overemotional and politically naïve in her representation of a terrorist client." [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/nyregion/29stewart.html?_r=1&oref=slogin] .
Stewart requested that the Court exercise the considerable sentencing discretion given to judges by the
U.S. Supreme Court ruling inU.S. v. Booker and impose a non-custodial sentence. The government requested that the Court impose the maximum statutory penalty, stating, "We hope that this sentence of 30 years will not only punish Stewart for her actions, but serve as a deterrent for other lawyers who believe that they are above the rules and regulations of penal institutions or otherwise try to skirt the laws of this country."Stewart's original sentencing was to be in July 2005 but Stewart's defense team had repeatedly asked for and received numerous adjournments (delaying sentencing for over a year) due to her needing treatment for breast cancer.
In explaining his refusal to either impose the 30-year sentence proposed by the prosecution or waive jail time entirely as Stewart had requested, the judge said that during her long career of representing unpopular clients Stewart had "performed a public service, not only to her clients, but to the nation," but that her actions in this case constituted "extraordinarily severe criminal conduct" [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6057200.stm]
Stewart is free on bail pending decision of her appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (courthouse in Manhattan). Briefs from both sides have been filed. Her web site states the appeal was orally argued January 29, 2008. At the same time the court heard the Government's appeal of the sentence as too lenient.
Her case was the inspiration for an episode of "
Law & Order " entitled "Open Season".upport and opposition
Stewart's most outspoken support came from the
National Lawyers Guild of which she was a member. Some of Stewart's supporters included theCenter for Constitutional Rights and theNational Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers ; both organizations filed amicus briefs in support of Stewart. They expressed concerns that the prosecution for zealous defense tactics could cause attorneys to become fearful of defending alleged terrorists and deprive individuals of their constitutional right todue process . [http://writ.news.findlaw.com/cassel/20050214.html]At a press conference at the courthouse following her conviction, Stewart stated, "I hope it will be a wakeup call to all of the citizens of this country and all of the people who live here that you can't lock up the lawyers."
Ben Johnson, writing in the conservative "
Front Page Magazine ", said that the trial was "in many ways a trial of the Left itself," but noted that the verdict "will not still theanti-American fanaticism of Stewart’s and Yousry’s campus cult-worshippers. Their hatred of this country blinds them to its greatness just as it excused their evil deeds – and will probably cause them to overlook the pro-terrorist actions of Stewart’s comrades in the future." [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17004]The Jewish Defense Organization had demonstration against Lynne Stewart as was reported in the NY Times and called Stewart an enemy of Jews and traitor to America. JDO website also gave out her home address.
Writing in "
National Review ", Rachel Zabarkes Friedman writes that Stewart expresses "approval" for the legacies of Stalin, Mao, and Castro [ [http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/friedman200502151443.asp Stewart’s Betrayal] ,National Review ] referring to an interview in which Stewart is asked if she will accept monitoring and control of political prisoners by a government she supports. In reply, Stewart describes her position as "a strange amalgam of old-line things and new-line things. I don't have any problem with Mao or Stalin or the Vietnamese leaders or certainly Fidel locking up people they see as dangerous. Because so often, dissidence has been used by the greater powers to undermine a people's revolution. The CIA pays a thousand people and cuts them loose, and they will undermine any revolution in the name of freedom of speech", adding "on the other hand, I do believe in a free marketplace of ideas. I have a big problem with government repressing that kind of exchange…". [cite web|url=http://www.monthlyreview.org/1102day.htm|title=Counter-Intelligent: The Surveillance and Indictment of Lynne Stewart|first=Susie|last=Day|date=November 2002|publisher=Monthly Review |accessdate=2006-10-16]See also
*
List of disbarred attorneys References
External links
* [http://www.lynnestewart.org/ LynneStewart.org] - Supporters of Lynne Stewart
* [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aWPO.6oKgMsw&refer=us N.Y. Attorney Lynne Stewart Convicted of Aiding Terrorist Group (Bloomberg article)]
* [http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/November/03_crm_631.htm U.S. Department of Justice press release on the indictment of Stewart, Yousry and Sattar]
* [http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/uslstwrt111903sind.html Superseding Indictment ("U.S. v. Sattar, et al.") Nov. 19, 2003] , from FindLaw
* [http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/algama.htm US Government profile of the Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya]
* [http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200502150746.asp Lynne Stewart & Me] article fromNational Review Online
* [http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AnnCoulter/2006/10/18/oj_trials_for_terrorists O.J. trials for terrorists] byAnn Coulter
* [http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1185995388.pdf The Terrorists' Legal Team by] Matthew Vadum
* [http://talkleft.com/new_archives/002547.html Revoking the Attorney-Client Privilege: Lynne Stewart Case]
* [http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/03/04/cancer_delays_s.php Lynne Stewart is revealed to have breast cancer, March 4th, 2006]
* [http://lawanddisorder.org/media/lawanddisorder07242006.mp3 Part one of two-part radio interview of Lynne Stewart regarding her legal problems]
** [http://lawanddisorder.org/media/lawanddisorder07312006.mp3 Part two]
* [http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1177405474388 Stewart's request to voluntarily resign from the practice of law after the guilty verdict is denied April 24, 2007, on the ground the verdict led to "automatic" disbarment.]
* [http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=23547 TUC Radio. Michael Ratner and Lynne Stewart speak on Fighting Back tour, February 23, 2007]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.