- Battle of Shicun
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Shicun
partof=Chinese Civil War
place=Anhui ,China
date=October, 1945 - October, 1945
result=communist victory
combatant1=
combatant2=
commander1= Hu Zepu 胡泽普
commander2= ?
strength1= 6,500
strength2= 2,500
casualties1= 2,000+
casualties2= 200+|The battle of Shicun (时村战斗) was a battle fought at the Time Village (Shicun, 时村) of Xiu (宿) County in
Anhui , and it was a clash between thecommunist s and the former nationalists turned Japanese puppet regime force who rejoined the nationalists afterWorld War II . The battle was one of theChinese Civil War in the immediate postWorld War II era.Prelude
Like other similar clashes immediately after the end of World War II between the
communist s and the nationalists inChina , this conflict also rooted from the fact thatChiang Kai-shek had realized that his nationalist regime simply had neither the sufficient troops nor enough transportation assets to deploy his troops into the Japanese-occupied regions ofChina . Unwilling to let thecommunist s who had already dominated most of the rural regions inChina to further expand their territories by accepting the Japanese surrender and thus would consequently control the Japanese occupied regions,Chiang Kai-shek ordered the Japanese and their turncoat Chinese puppet regime not to surrender to thecommunist s and kept their fighting capabilities to “maintain order” in the Japanese occupied regions, fighting off thecommunist s as necessary, until the final arrivals and completion of the deployment of the nationalist troops. As a result, most members of the Japanese puppet regimes and their military forces rejoined the nationalists.However, it must be noted that most of these former nationalists turned Japanese puppet regime forces were not from
Chiang Kai-shek ’s own clique, but instead, they were mainly consisted of troops of warlords who were only nominally under theChiang Kai-shek ’s beforeWorld War II , since they were nationalists in name only and mostly maintained their independent and semi-independent status. These warlords were only interested in keeping their own power and defected to the Japanese side when Japanese invaders offered to let them keep their power in exchange for their collaborations. After theWorld War II , these forces of former Japanese puppet regimes once again returned to the nationalist camp for the same reason they defected to the Japanese invaders. Obviously, it was difficult for Chiang to immediately get rid of these warlords for good as soon as they surrendered to Chiang and rejoined nationalists, because such move would alienate other factions within the nationalist ranks, and these former Japanese puppet regime's warlords could still help the nationalists to gain more territories by holding on to what was under their control until Chiang completed the deployment of his own troops to takeover.Chiang Kai-shek ’s objective was to simultaneously solve the warlord problem that had plaguedChina for so long and the problem of the extermination ofcommunism together, which proved to be an extremely fatal mistake for him and his nationalist regime later on, as shown in this conflict.
=Nationalist Strategy=In accordance with his strategy to simultaneously solve the warlord problem that had plagued
China for so long and the problem of the extermination ofcommunism together,Chiang Kai-shek and his followers had hoped that these former Japanese puppet regime's warlords who rejoined the nationalists would be able to hold on to the regions long enough for Chiang to deploy his own troops by holding offcommunist s. If thecommunist s were victorious in such conflicts, however, the result would still benefit to Chiang and China because the power of these warlords would be reduced as their military forces were smashed by thecommunist s, and the warlord problem plagued China for so long could thus be greatly reduced, while at the same time,communist s would be weakened by the fights and Chiang's own troops would have easier time to take control.For the former nationalist turned Japanese puppet regime forces, these warlords and their troops had no problem of following
Chiang Kai-shek ’s orders, and they were eager to prove themselves. These warlords and their troops were well aware that due to the collaboration with the Japanese invaders during theSecond Sino-Japanese War , they were well hated by the general population inChina , including those nationalists who refused to surrender to the enemy and fought the enemy until the eventual victory. Therefore, in the impending demilitarization afterWorld War II , they were certainly be disarmed and discharged, which would probably be the best outcome and the power of these warlord would be reduced or even completely eliminated as a result.Chiang Kai-shek ’s ordering them not surrendering to thecommunist s and fighting off thecommunist s was a savior for them because by carrying out such orders, these warlords and their troops could legitimize themselves and thus retain their power by fighting thecommunist s who were targeted as rebels byChiang Kai-shek and his nationalist regime.Communist StrategyThe
communist strategy was much simpler than that of the nationalists because there was not any huge division within thecommunist rank like that of the nationalist. Thecommunist s already earned considerable popular support by being the only Chinese force left in the region fighting the Japanese invaders and their puppet regime after the nationalist withdrew, and after successfully establishingcommunist bases in the rural regions where better life was provided to the general populace in comparison to that of Japanese occupied regions, the general Chinese populace agreed that thecommunist s were well deserved to represent theChina to accept the invaders’ surrender in the region and takeover the regions occupied by the invaders.Battle
In October, 1945, the communist decided to take Time Village (Shicun, 时村) of Xiu (宿) County in
Anhui by force after the local defenders consisted of former nationalists turned Japanese puppet regime force who rejoined the nationalists afterWorld War II refused to surrender. However, the defenders consisted of a division was able to successfully fend off the initial communist attacks by relying on their strong fortifications. The communists change their tactic and the 34th Regiment of the 12th Brigade of the 4th Division of the communistNew Fourth Army launched its attack on the village at night, breaching the defense. After fierce street battle, the defenders were forced to flee and the village had fallen into the communist hands. The communists inflicted over 2,000 casualties on the defenders, including capturing the nationalist commander Hu Zepu (胡泽普) alive, and in addition, they had also captured over 1,000 firearms. The attacking communists suffered over 200 casualties.Outcome
Like other similar clashes immediately after the end of World War II between the
communist s and the nationalists inChina , this conflict also showed thatChiang Kai-shek ’s attempt to simultaneously solve the warlord problem that had plaguedChina for so long and the problem of the extermination ofcommunism together proved to be a fatal mistake. Although the result of the campaign turned out exactly likeChiang Kai-shek and his subordinates had predicted, and consequently the power of the warlords in this region was indeed reduced as their military forces were smashed by the communists, so that the warlord problem plaguedChina for so long was thus reduced for this particular region, andChiang Kai-shek ’s secondary objective was achieved here, any positive gains obtained by the nationalists were negated by the politic fallout. The reason was that this success of achieving the secondary objective came at a huge cost in nationalists’ loss of popular support in this region formerly dominated by the Japanese, because the local population had already blamed nationalilsts for losing the regions to the Japanese invaders, while reassigning these former Japanese puppet regime forces as the nationalist forces to fight the communists, the only Chinese force left in the regions, only further alienated the local populace and strengthened the popular resentment toChiang Kai-shek and his nationalist government.ee also
*List of Battles of Chinese Civil War
*National Revolutionary Army
*History of the People's Liberation Army
*Chinese Civil War References
*Zhu, Zongzhen and Wang, Chaoguang, "Liberation War History", 1st Edition, Social Scientific Literary Publishing House in
Beijing , 2000,ISBN 7801492072 (set)
*Zhang, Ping, "History of the Liberation War", 1st Edition, Chinese Youth Publishing House inBeijing , 1987,ISBN 750060081X (pbk.)
*Jie, Lifu, "Records of the Libration War: The Decisive Battle of Two Kinds of Fates", 1st Edition,Hebei People's Publishing House inShijiazhuang , 1990,ISBN 7202007339 (set)
*Literary and Historical Research Committee of theAnhui Committee of theChinese People's Political Consultative Conference , "Liberation War", 1st Edition,Anhui People's Publishing House inHefei , 1987,ISBN 7212000078
*Li, Zuomin, "Heroic Division and Iron Horse: Records of the Liberation War", 1st Edition, Chinese Communist Party History Publishing House inBeijing , 2004,ISBN 7801990293
*Wang, Xingsheng, and Zhang, Jingshan, "Chinese Liberation War", 1st Edition,People's Liberation Army Literature and Art Publishing House inBeijing , 2001,ISBN 750331351X (set)
*Huang, Youlan, "History of the Chinese People's Liberation War", 1st Edition, Archives Publishing House inBeijing , 1992,ISBN 7800193381
*Liu Wusheng, "FromYan'an toBeijing : A Collection of Military Records and Research Publications of Important Campaigns in the Liberation War", 1st Edition, Central Literary Publishing House inBeijing , 1993,ISBN 7507300749
*Tang, Yilu and Bi, Jianzhong, "History of ChinesePeople's Liberation Army in Chinese Liberation War", 1st Edition, Military Scientific Publishing House inBeijing , 1993 – 1997,ISBN 7800217191 (Volum 1), 7800219615 (Volum 2), 7800219631 (Volum 3), 7801370937 (Volum 4), and 7801370953 (Volum 5)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.