Foakes v Beer

Foakes v Beer

English case infobox
name=John Weston Foakes v. Julia Beer
court=Appeal Cases
date_decided=31 March, 1 April 1884
full_name= John Weston Foakes and Julia Beer
citations= [1881-85] All ER Rep 106; 9 App Cas 605; 54 LJQB 130; 51 LT 833; 33 WR 233
judges=Earl of Selborne LC, Lord Blackburn, Lord Watson and Lord FitzGerald
Cases_cited=
Legislation_cited=
prior_actions=
subsequent_actions=
Keywords=Consideration

"Foakes v. Beer" [Case citation| [1881-85] All ER Rep 106] is a controversial application of the Pre-existing Duty Rule and a leading case from the House of Lords on the legal concept of consideration. It established the rule that prevents parties from discharging an obligation by part performance, affirming "Pinnel's Case" (1602) 5 Co Rep 117a. In that case it was said that "payment of a lessor sum on the day [i.e., on or after the due date of a money debt] cannot be any satisfaction of the whole." Furthermore, the doctrine of promissory estoppel, developed in the "High Trees" case can mitigate the harsh effects of this rule.

Facts

The appellant, John Weston Foakes, owed the respondent, Julia Beer, a sum of £2,090 19s. Beer agreed that she would not take any action against Foakes for the amount owed if he would sign an agreement promising to pay an initial sum of £500 and pay £150 twice yearly until the whole amount was paid back. Foakes was in financial difficulty, and so Beer waived any interest on the amount owed.

Foakes made the payments as agreed without any interest. Beer sues Foakes for the interest.

Ruling

At trial, the court found in favour of Foakes, but was reversed by the Court of Appeal. The House of Lords upheld the ruling of the Court of Appeal in favour of Beer.

The reasoning behind their judgment was that though the agreement did not contemplate the interest owed, it could still be implied given an enforceable agreement. However, the promise to pay a debt was deemed "not to be sufficient consideration" as there was no additional benefit moving from Foakes to Beer that was not already owed to her.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Foakes v Beer — House of Lords Entschieden am 1. April 1884 Vollständiger Name: John Weston Foakes v Julia Beer Fundstellen …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Consideration under English law — Consideration is one of the three main building blocks of a contract in English contract law. Consideration can be anything of value (such as an item or service), which each party to a legally binding contract must agree to exchange if the… …   Wikipedia

  • Pinnel's Case — cite book last=Coke first=Edward authorlink=Edward Coke editor=Thomas, John Henry and Fraser, John Farquhar title=The Reports of Sir Edward Coke origyear=1604 url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DlYDAAAAQAAJ printsec=titlepage source=gbs… …   Wikipedia

  • Collier v P & MJ Wright (Holdings) Ltd — Collier v P M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd Citation(s) [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2008] 1 WLR 643 Keywords consideration, promissory estoppel Collier v P M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] …   Wikipedia

  • Consideration in English law — is one of the three main building blocks of a contract. Consideration can be anything of value (such as an item or service), which each party to a legally binding contract must agree to exchange if the contract is to be valid. If only one party… …   Wikipedia

  • List of notable United Kingdom House of Lords cases — This page is for notable House of Lords legal cases. pre 1850 * Donaldson v. Beckett , 2 Brown s Parl. Cases 129, 1 Eng. Rep. 837; 4 Burr. 2408, 98 Eng. Rep. 257 (1774) * Wright v. Tatham (1838) 4 Bing. NC 489 : hearsay 1850 1899 * Dimes v Grand… …   Wikipedia

  • Landmark decision — A landmark decision is the outcome of a legal case (often thus referred to as a landmark case) that establishes a precedent that either substantially changes the interpretation of the law or that simply establishes new case law on a particular… …   Wikipedia

  • Central London Property Trust Ltd v. High Trees House Ltd — English case infobox name=Central London Property Trust Ltd v. High Trees House Ltd court=King s Bench Division date decided= 18 July 1946 full name= Central London Property Trust Ltd and High Trees House Ltd citations= [1947] K.B. 130; [1956] 1… …   Wikipedia

  • Accord and satisfaction — In contract law, accord and satisfaction is the purchase of the release from a debt obligation. The payment is typically less than what is owed and is not paid by the actual performance of the original obligation. The accord is the agreement to… …   Wikipedia

  • Estoppel (English law) — Estoppel is a legal doctrine that may be used in certain situations to prevent a person from relying upon certain rights, or upon a set of facts (eg. words said or actions performed) which is different from an earlier set of facts. Estoppel could …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”