- John Jervis (politician)
Sir John Jervis (
12 January ,1802 -1 November ,1856 ) was an Englishlawyer , law reformer and Attorney General in the administration ofLord John Russell . He subsequently became ajudge and enjoyed a career as a robust but intelligent and innovativejurist , a career cut short by his early and sudden death.Early life
The son of
Thomas Jervis , he was educated atWestminster School andTrinity College, Cambridge though he did not graduate, preferring to take a commission as an officer in theBritish Army . However, after two years he returned to study law beingcalled to the bar by theMiddle Temple in 1824.Getzler (2004)]Jervis followed his father onto the
Oxford circuit and theChester and northWales circuit and built a substantial practice, being appointed a postman of the Court of Exchequer. He was offered the distinction ofQueen's Counsel in 1837 but, aspiring to a political career, he declined, managing to obtain apatent of precedence instead.Legal author
Between 1826 and 1832, he collaborated in
law report ing withCharles John Crompton ("Crompton & Jervis ") and was also the co-reporter in "Younge & Jervis ". "Jervis's Office and Duties of Coroners " (1829) remains the leading practitioners' text oncoroner s andinquest s with a 13th edition due in late 2007. He undertook a major rewrite of "Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice " to produce the 4th edition (1831) and went on to edit the 5th to 8th editions.Jervis went on to author four editions of "
All the Rules of the Courts of King's Bench and Common Pleas and Exchequer " (1832-9) and established his reputation as a leading scholar of procedure so that in 1850 he was appointed chair of a commission to inquire into practice and procedure at thecommon law courts, alongsideJames Shaw Willes andGeorge Wilshere, 1st Baron Bramwell . [Parl. papers, 1851, 22; 1852–3, 40] The commission's findings ["First Report of the Common Law Procedure Commission" (1851)] led to theCommon Law Procedure Acts 1852-4 which started the process of rationalising the English courts, until then still hampered by much medieval practice, and creating the modern system. [ cite web | url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/maitland-formsofaction.html | title=The Forms of Action at Common Law | accessdate=2007-07-06 | author=Maitland, F. W. | authorlink=Frederic William Maitland | year=1909 , Lecture 1]The Jervis Acts
By 1848, the institution of
Justice of the Peace inEngland and Wales had fallen into disrepute,Freestone & Richardson (1980) "p."5] its statutory basis dating back to the sixteenth century.Freestone & Richardson (1980) "p."9] Jervis was responsible for sponsoring, drafting and all-but single-handedly guiding through the House of Commons three bills to reform the criminal and civil roles of a Justice of the Peace in England and Wales:
*Indictable Offences Act 1848 ;
*Summary Jurisdiction Act 1848 ; and
*Justices Protection Act 1848 .The Acts won considerable praise as soon as they came into force though they did later attract criticism for their verbose style. In retrospect, Getzler expresses the opinion that the system of local justices would have fallen into further disrepute and ultimate decline and desuetude without these reforms. These Acts largely defined the modern system of summary and
indictable offence s within theMagistrates' Court s.Freestone & Richardson (1980) "p."10]The first two Acts defined the duties of Justices acting other than at
quarter sessions ("i.e." "out of sessions"). Jervis achieved consistency of practice by appending extensive forms and precedents to the Acts so as to provide a straightforward means by which Justices could comply though allowing them, at least the perception of, freedom to adapt to local circumstances. The prudent Justice followed the precedent and this was a tactic Jervis was to use again in the Common Law Procedure Acts.The Indictable Offences Act is important in that it is the first codification of the caution in
England and Wales , in the words: [Freestone & Richardson (1980) "pp"11-12]A fourth Act, the
Petty Sessions Act 1849 , proscribed the holding ofpetty sessions in "unsuitable" premises such aspublic house s, though it was delayed because the Bill's provisions as to salaries formagistrates' clerk s and statutory scales for court fees proved unacceptable. [Freestone & Richardson (1980) "p."8]Political and judicial career
He was elected Liberal
Member of Parliament for Chester in 1832 and held the seat until he became a judge in 1850. Jervis was never overly concerned with local politics and was distant as a constituency MP, even being censured in the Liberal "Chester Chronicle" for his inaction over the River Dee Bill and his overly-insistent attempts to ensure that his son was nominated as candidate in his stead when he stood down. Jervis did however take an uncharacteristic interest in the Chester Criminals' Execution Bill (1835) and the Weaver Churches Bill (1840). [Freestone & Richardson (1980) "pp"6-7] Jervis was appointed Solicitor General in 1846, becoming Attorney-General three days later when Thomas Wilde became a judge.Jervis was Attorney-General while the
revolutions of 1848 were unfolding acrossEurope and affecting events in the UK. The collateral domestic civil unrest resulted in the speedy enactment of theTreason Felony Act 1848 and Jervis was involved in the drafting and promotion of the Bill. [Freestone & Richardson (1980) "p."8] The Act in turn generated a heavy workload for Jervis in runningprosecution s against Chartist activists. Jervis won all such prosecution and achieved some fame and honour, being considered for high judicial office. He was subsequently appointedChief Justice of the Common Pleas , knighted and appointed a Privy Councillor. In 1854, he heard the case of "Talbot v. Laroche ", a legal action pivotal to thehistory of photography . [* cite book | title=The Calotype Patent Lawsuit of Talbot v. Laroche 1854 | author=Wood, R. D. | publisher=privately published | location=Bromley, Kent | year=1975 | url=http://www.midleykent.fsnet.co.uk/laroche/TalbotvLaroche.htm | id=ISBN 0-9504377-0-0 ]Jervis died suddenly, possibly of
lung cancer , inLondon and was buried atShipbourne .References
Bibliography
* [Anon.] "The Jurist", new ser., 2/2 (1856), "p."458
* [Anon.] "Law Times", 8 Nov 1856, "pp"85–6
* [Anon.] (1856-7) "Law Magazine", new ser. 2, "pp"302–7
* [Anon.] "The English Reports", 178 vols. (1900–32) vols. 118–19, "pp"138–9, 148, 169
*cite book | author=Baker, J. H. | title=An Introduction to Legal History | edition=4th ed. | year=2002 | id=ISBN 0406930538
* cite journal | author=Freestone, D. & Richardson, J. C. | title=The making of English criminal law (7): Sir John Jervis and his acts | journal=Criminal Law Review | year=1980 | pages=5–16
* cite book | author=Foss, E. | title=A Biographical Dictionary of the Judges of England: From the Conquest to the Present Time 1066-1870 | origyear=1848–64 | year=2006 | id=ISBN 1428629599 | authorlink=Edward Foss 9.216–18
*Getzler, J. S. (2004) " [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/14795 Jervis, Sir John (1802–1856)] ", "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography ", Oxford University Press, accessed 4 July 2007 ODNBsub
* cite book | title=W. S. Holdsworth, A History of English Law | author=Goodhart, A. L. & Hanbury, H.G. | edition=17 vols. | year= 1903–72 , vol.15
*cite book | author=Kostal, R. W. | title=Law and English Railway Capitalism, 1825–1875 | year=1994 | id=ISBN 019825671X
*Manchester, A. H. "Jervis, John", in cite book | title=Biographical Dictionary of the Common Law | author=Simpson, A. W. B. (ed.) | year=1984 | id=ISBN 040651657X "pp"279–80
* cite book | author=Manson, E. | title=Builders of our Law during the Reign of Queen Victoria | edition=2nd ed. | year=1904 | pages="pp"50–57External links
* [http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/coroners/johnjervis.html Page at Coroner's Law Resource] ,
King's College London
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.