- New Hampshire v. Maine
-
New Hampshire v. Maine
Supreme Court of the United StatesOriginal jurisdiction
Argued April 19, 1977
Decided June 14, 1977Full case name New Hampshire v. Maine Outcome Consent decree stipulated between parties and agreed to by parties is permissible under Vermont v. New York, 417 U.S. 270 (1974). States are not adjusting the boundary between them, which was fixed by the 1740 decree; the consent decree simply locates precisely the already existing boundary, and neither State is enhancing its power and threatening supremacy of the Federal Government. Court membership Chief Justice
Warren E. BurgerAssociate Justices
William J. Brennan, Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. StevensCase opinions Majority Brennan, joined by Burger, Stewart, Marshall, Powell, Rehnquist Dissent White, joined by Blackmun, Stevens New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363 (1977),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the boundary between the states of New Hampshire and Maine was fixed by the 1740 decree of King George II of Great Britain. Both sides entered into a consent decree which was accepted the special master appointed by the Court.
See also
- Florida v. Georgia
- Piscataqua River border dispute, New Hampshire v. Maine, No. 130 Original, 532 U.S. 742 (2001)
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 426
- State of New Mexico v. State of Texas
References
- ^ 426 U.S. 363 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.
Categories:- United States Supreme Court cases
- Internal territorial disputes of the United States
- United States Supreme Court original jurisdiction cases
- 1977 in United States case law
- United States Supreme Court stubs
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.