- Tupilaq
In
Greenland icInuit (Kalaallit )folklore , a tupilaq (tupilak or ""cite web|url=http://www.livingdictionary.com/search/viewResults.jsp?language=en&searchString=tupilak&languageSet=all |title=tupilak|work=Asuilaak Living Dictionary|accessdate=2007-12-12] ) was an avenging monster fabricated by a practitioner ofwitchcraft orshamanism by using various objects such as animal parts (bone, hair, etc...) and even parts taken from the corpses of children. The creature was given life by being allowed to suck the vital essence or life force from its creator's sexual organs. It was then placed into the sea to seek and destroy a specific enemy.The use of a tupilaq was risky however because if it was sent to destroy someone who had greater magical powers than the one who had formed it, it could be sent back to kill its maker instead,Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 23; Plate XLIII, XLV] although the maker of tupilaq could escape by public confession of his/her own deed. [Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 23, 10]
Because tupilaqs were made in secret, in isolated places and from perishable materials, none have been preserved. Early
Europe an visitors to Greenland, fascinated by the native legend, were eager to see what tupilaqs looked like so the Inuit began to carve representations of them out ofSperm Whale .Today, tupilaqs of many different shapes and sizes are carved from various materials such as
narwhal andwalrus tusk , wood and caribou antler. They are an important part of GreenlandicInuit art and are highly prized as collectibles.Publicity versus secrecy
As mentioned above, tupilaqs were made in secret; and making a tupilaq was risky to its own maker if the attacked person made it rebound: in this case, public confession was the only rescue. The magic consequences of situations of concealment, and the neutralizing effect of public confession was believed also in several other areas of life, thus, this is an example of the more general topic of secrecy versus publicity.Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 10]
Concealment
Concealment or secrecy could raise magic consequences in several areas of life:
* Concealed miscarriage or infanticide could give birth to a monster called "anngiaq". [Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 14–15]
* It could make harm for the community if somebody concealed his/hertaboo breach.
* Secrecy was also preliminary for the functioning of so-called "formulae" (texts or songs used like charm or spell in danger, need, hunt, practical everyday situations). [Kleivan & Sonne 1985:9–10] [ [http://www.archive.org/details/acrossarcticamer006641mbp Rasmussen 1927] : 136–137 (= 206, 209 in PDF)]Neutralizing effect of public confession
Thus, concealment was a preliminary for several magical effects. If this was broken, unintentionally or intentionally, the effect could lose its power.
* The shamans in some Eskimo groups resolved the consequence of taboo breach by achieving public confession of the breacher. [Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 26, 28]
* Hunting means killing, and animals were believed to havesoul s as well. Efforts were made to avoid the revenge taken by the game and to please the game symbolically. [Burch & Forman 1988: 96] Such would be the danger inherent in the first kill of a boy and it was "neutralized" by a public ritual, in which the each adult member of the community had to make an incision into the head of the game, or ate a piece from it. Thus, the belief was, that public partaking in a dangerous thing reduces the danger, that is it has a neutralizing effect. [Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 16]Meanings of the same term in various Inuit cultures
Eskimo cultures were far from being alike, although there were some similarities. [Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 2] Similarly to
shamanism among Eskimo peoples , also the tupilaq concept had variants. It might be a man-made object, a ghost-like being or a haunting soul. In some cultures it was exactly the shaman who had to deal with it.Such distant groups like the
Caribou Inuit , Greenland Inuit, Iglulingmiut (Iglulik, Nunavut Inuit) andCopper Inuit knew the concept of "tupilaq". [Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 22–23] But the details differed:;Iglulik:The tupilaq was an invisible ghost. Only the shaman could notice it. It was the soul of a dead person, which became restless because the breach of some death taboo. It scared game away from the vicinity. Thus, the shaman had to help by scaring it away with a knife.Kleivan & Sonne 1985: 23] ;Caribou Inuit:The tupilaq was also an invisible being. Like at Iglulik, also the shaman was the only one who could see it. It was a chimera-like creature, with human head and parts from different species of animals. It was dangerous, it might attack the settlement. Then, the shaman had to combat it and devour it with his/her helping spirits.;Greenland:The tupilaq was manifested in real, human-made object. It was made by people to the detriment of their enemies. It was a puppet-like thing, but was thought of have magical power onto the victim. It might be made e.g. of mixtured parts of dead animals, dead child.;Copper Inuit:To the Copper Inuit the tupilaq was similar to theChristian Devil . [cite book|last=Ohokak|first=G.|coauthors=M. Kadlun, B. Harnum|title=Inuinnaqtun-English Dictionary|publisher=Kitikmeot Heritage Society]Notes
References
*
*
*External links
*
*
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.