- Kamyana Mohyla
Kamyana Mohyla ( _uk. Кам'яна Могила; _ru. Каменная могила; literally: "stone tomb") is an archaeological site in the
Molochna River valley, about a mile from the village of Terpinnya,Zaporizhia Oblast ,Ukraine .The site encompasses a group of isolated blocks of
sandstone , up to twelve meters in height, scattered around an area of some 3,000 square meters. AsNoghai legend has it, it resulted from a scuffle of twobaghatur s who took turns throwing rocks at each other. In truth, the site had its origins in asandbank of theTethys Ocean . For a long time it was an island in the Molochna River, which has since been silted up and now flows a short distance to the west. It is thought to represent the only sandstone outcrop in theAzov-Kuban Depression .The shape of this sand hill is similar to that of
kurgan s that dot thePontic-Caspian steppe . In 1889, the Russian archaeologistNikolay Veselovsky was called upon to explore the enigmatic site and started excavations the following year. As soon as he concluded that the site was a burial mound, excavations were terminated. There was very little scientific exploration of the site during the first third of the 20th century.In the 1930s the site was investigated by a team of scholars from
Melitopol underValentin Danylenko (1913-82). The young archaeologist claimed to have discovered thirty caves withpetroglyph inscriptions which he dated to the 20th century B.C. to the 17th century A.D. Danylenko resumed his work on the site afterWorld War II and claimed to have discovered thirteen additional caves with petroglyphs.While a few eyebrows were raised at his suggestions, the site was designated an archaeological preserve in 1954. The move was intended to prevent the area from being flooded after construction of a
water reservoir . During the following decades, the condition of petroglyphs visibly deteriorated. Danylenko's magnum opus about the site was released posthumously, but it took the publication ofAnatoly Kifishin 's hefty monograph in 2001 to attract wider attention to Kamenna Mohyla.In this controversial work, Kifishin compared the petroglyphs of Kamenna Mohyla to those of
Çatalhöyük and concluded that both were related to theSumer iancuneiform script . Shortly before his death,Igor Diakonov lashed out against Kifishin's hypothesis (the two openly feuded since the 1960s). However, the Ukrainian media eagerly seized on Kifishin's notion about "proto-cuneiform texts" of Kamenna Mohyla and vulgarized it into sensationalist headlines about "Ukraine as theUrheimat of theSumerians " [http://www.zn.ua/3000/3900/32973/]Petroglyphs are found only inside the caves and grottoes of Kamenna Mohyla, many of them still filled up with sand. No adequate protection from the elements has been provided to this day. No traces of ancient human settlement have been discovered in the vicinity, leading many scholars to believe that the hill served as a remote
sanctuary . Faint traces of red paint remain on parts of the surface. Scholars have been unable to agree whether the petroglyphs date fromStone Age orNew Stone Age . The latter dating is more popular, although the presumed depiction of amammoth in one of the caves seems to favour the former date.In 2006, the government of Ukraine nominated the site for inscription on the
World Heritage List . On the whole, the Stone Tomb images represent traces of religious exercises of the hunters and cattle-breeders of this steppe zone of southeast Europe from the 20th c. B.C. to the 17th c. A.D. Sorne caves are of artificial origin; their cultural strata have been fixed as the Neolithic, Bronze and Early Iron Ages as well as of Middle Ages. So we have all the grounds to consider the Stone Tomb one of the oldest megalithic temples of the world which had been functioning many thousand years.. [http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5075/]See also
*
Ural characters
*Vinča signs References
* Рудинський М. Я. Кам’яна Могила (корпус наскельних рисунків), видавництво АН УССР, Київ, 1961.
* Даниленко В. М. Кам’яна Могила, «Наукова Думка», Київ, 1986.
* Михайлов Б. Д. Петроглифы Каменной Могилы на Украине, Запорожье, 1994.
* Кифишин А. Г., Древнее святилище Каменная Могила. Опыт дешифровки протошумерского архива XII-III тысячелетий до н.э., «Аратта», Киев, 2001.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.