Battle of Asculum (279 BC)

Battle of Asculum (279 BC)

:"This article refers to the Pyrrhic War battle fought in 279 BC. For the Second Punic War battle fought in 209 BC, see Battle of Asculum (209 BC)."

Infobox Military Conflict

caption=Most_important_places_in_the_Pyrrhic_War
conflict=Battle of Asculum
partof=the Pyrrhic War
date=279 BC
place=Asculum, modern Ascoli Satriano, Apulia, Italy
result=Pyrrhic Greek victory
combatant1=Roman Republic
combatant2=Epirus,
Magna Graecia|
commander1=Publius Decius Mus
commander2=Pyrrhus of Epirus
strength1=40,000 cavalry and infantry,
300 anti-elephant devices
strength2=40,000 cavalry and infantry,
20 war elephants
casualties1=6,000 dead
casualties2=3,500 dead

The Battle of Asculum (or Ausculum) [Michael Grant, The History of Rome, p. 79] took place in 279 BC between the Romans under the command of Consul Publius Decius Mus and the combined Tarantine, Oscan, Samnite, and Epirote army forces, under the command of the Greek king Pyrrhus of Epirus. This battle is set within the Romano-Tarantine conflict, to control Magna Graecia. For further information on this conflict, see the history of Taranto.

Armies

This battle was the second encounter between an Alexandrian, phalanx-based army and the Roman legion. The two armies were equally numbered.

The Romans had more infantry (four legions, 20,000 Romans, plus Dauni allies) and 300 anti-elephant devices. After the battle of Heraclea, in which the Greek war elephants had a heavy impact on the Romans, the legions were provided with flammable weapons and anti-elephant devices: these were ox-led chariots, equipped with long spikes to wound the elephants, pots of fire to scare them, and screening troops who would hurl javelins at the elephants to drive them away.

Pyrrhus deployed Macedonian infantry and cavalry, his own troops, Greek mercenary infantry, allied Italian Greeks, including a Tarantine militia, 20 elephants, and Samnite infantry and cavalry. The Greek army had an advantage in cavalry and the 20 elephants. In order to counter the more flexible Roman legion, Pyrrhus had mixed some light Italic troops to his phalanx.

Battle

The battle was fought over two days. As was customary of the warfare of the period, both armies deployed their cavalry on the wings and infantry in the centre. Pyrrhus held his Guard cavalry in reserve behind the centre under his personal command. The elephants were also kept initially in reserve.

On the first day, Pyrrhus' cavalry and elephants were blocked by the woods and hills where the battle was fought, however, the Italic soldiers in the phalanxes fought well. The Macedonians broke the Roman first legion and Latin allies on their left wing but the Roman third and fourth legions defeated the Tarantines, Oscans and Epirotes of Pyrrhus' centre. Meanwhile a force of Dauni attacked his camp. He sent reserve cavalry to deal with the breakthrough, more cavalry and some elephants to drive off the Dauni. When they withdrew to an inaccessible steep hill he deployed the elephants against the third and fourth legions; these too took refuge on wooded heights, but took fire from the archers and slingers escorting the elephants, and could not reply. Pyrrhus sent Athamanian, Acharnian and Samnite infantry to drive the Romans out of the woods, who were intercepted by Roman cavalry. Both sides withdrew at dusk, neither having gained a significant advantage.

At dawn Pyrrhus sent light infantry to occupy the difficult ground which had proven a weak point the previous day, forcing the Romans to fight a set battle in the open. As at Heraclea, a collision of legion and phalanx followed, until the elephants, supported by light infantry, broke through the Roman line. At this point the anti-elephant wagons were driven against them; having proven effective briefly, these were overwhelmed by psiloi who negated the Roman chariots. The elephants then charged the Roman infantry, which buckled. Pyrrhus simultaneously ordered the Royal Guard to charge, completing the rout. The Romans retreated to their camp.

The Romans lost 6,000 men, Pyrrhus 3,500, including many of his officers. A narrow Greek victory, it is this battle which gave rise to the term "Pyrrhic victory," meaning a victory at so high a cost as to be worthless. Pyrrhus is later reported to have said, "One more such victory, and we shall be undone."

Bibliography

*Information about this war can be found in Plutarch's "Lives" ("Pyrrus" 2 1), Polybius, Dionysius of Halicarnassus (XX 1--3), and Livy.

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Asculum — Asculum, also known as Ausculum, was the ancient name of two Italian cities.The first is Ascoli Piceno, the Ausculum in ancient Picenum (modern Marche). It is situated in the valley of the Truentus (mod. Tronto) river on the via Salaria. It was… …   Wikipedia

  • 279 BC — NOTOC EventsBy placeGreece* An army of Gauls under Brennus invade Greece. A section of the army, commanded by Bolgios, crushes a Macedonian army led by Ptolemy Keraunos, who is killed in the battle. At the narrow pass of Thermopylae, on the east… …   Wikipedia

  • Bataille d'Ausculum (279 av. J.-C.) — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Bataille d Ausculum. Bataille d Ausculum Batailles de la guerre de Pyrrhus en Italie Informations générales …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Publius Decius Mus (279 BC) — Publius Decius Mus was a Roman politician and general. As consul in 279 BC, he and his fellow consul, Publius Sulpicius Saverrio, combined their armies against Pyrrhus of Epirus at the Battle of Asculum. Pyrrhus was victorious, but at such a high …   Wikipedia

  • Битва при Аускуле (279 до н. э.) — Битва при Аускуле Пиррова война Важнейшие битвы Пирровой войны Дата …   Википедия

  • Pyrrhic victory — A Pyrrhic victory (IPAEng|ˈpɪrɪk) is a victory with devastating cost to the victor. The phrase is named after King Pyrrhus of Epirus, whose army suffered irreplaceable casualties in defeating the Romans at Heraclea in 280 BC and Asculum in 279 BC …   Wikipedia

  • Laconic phrase — A laconic phrase is a very concise or terse statement, named after Laconia (a.k.a. Lacedaemon [Greek Λακεδαίμων ] ), a polis of ancient Greece (and region of modern Greece) surrounding the city of Sparta proper. In common usage, Sparta referred… …   Wikipedia

  • Historical deviations in Gladiator (2000 film) — Ridley Scott wanted to portray the Roman culture more accurately than in any previous film and to that end hired several historians as advisors. Some variations were to make the film more interesting and to improve story flow and some were for… …   Wikipedia

  • Campaign history of the Roman military — This article is part of the series on: Military of ancient Rome (portal) 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Roman army (unit types and ranks …   Wikipedia

  • List of battles before 601 — List of battles: before 601 601 1400 1401 1800 1801 1900 1901 2000 2001 current See also: List of Roman battles Before 500 BC5th century BC4th century BC*398 BC Siege of Motya Phoenician city Motya sacked. *397 BC Battle of Messene Ionian Greek… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”