Latvian security laws referendum, 2007

A referendum on two proposed security laws was held in Latvia on 7 July 2007; the referendum had been called after the president refused to sign the laws, claiming possible influence of oligarchs on Latvia's national security, and after 212,000 signatures had been collected, meeting the requirement of about 150,000 signatures. [ [http://web.cvk.lv/pub/public/28845.html On preliminary voting results] ] Although referendum failed to gain quorum of 453730 votes, the results showed a massive disapproval of the amendments.

Background

The President of Latvia has the power, as established by the constitution, to request that the Saeima reconsider a law; if the Saeima does not amend the law, then the president must sign it or suspend the law for two months. After this period the law must either be proclaimed or put to a national referendum, if 10% of electorate request so. [ [http://www.saeima.lv/LapasEnglish/Constitution_Saturs.htm Constitution of Latvia] ] President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga deemed the amendments in national security laws to be a threat to national security. As the Saeima did not amend the laws accordingly, the president used her power to suspend the laws. She said that she saw that the laws give employees of organization granting access to classified information the right to grant such permission to themselves, which could result in certain groups and individuals having the ability to manipulate the information in their own interests. After the suspension the Saeima did amend the laws as the president had originally requested, and the leaders of the governing coalition claimed that there was no need for a referendum given that the original amendments had already been ruled out and would come into force only for a day. [ [http://www.delfi.lv/archive/article.php?id=17181535 Konceptuāli nolemj atcelt grozījumu valsts drošības likumos] ] However, this led to calls of citizens to use their right to vote and speculations that the president could dissolve the Saeima. [ [http://www.delfi.lv/archive/article.php?id=17129375 Pieļauj, ka Prezidente varētu lemt par Saeimas atlaišanu] ] Thus the referendum was unofficially seen as a referendum over the resignation of Kalvītis' government and as a chance to show support for the popular president, who, coincidentally, left the office on the day the referendum took place, rather than as a referendum over amendments in security laws.

Legal details

Given that the Saeima has already cancelled the laws, if there had been no referendum, after the end of the suspension period the laws would have come into force for one day; the same will happen if a majority votes "Against" repealing the laws. However, if a majority votes "For" repealing the laws, the Saeima will not be able to revive the laws until the end of the current term of the Saeima. Furthermore, there is a requirement that at least half as many votes as in the last Saeima elections must be cast for the referendum to be valid, that is about 450,000 votes.

Results

The referendum did not gain quorum of 453730 votes. [ [http://web.cvk.lv/pub/public/28919.html CVK apstiprina tautas nobalsošanas rezultātus] ] The results showed a massive disapproval of the amendments. [ [http://www.cvk.lv/cvkserv/TN_2007/rez/rezultati.htm 2007.gada 7.jūlija tautas nobalsošanas rezultāti] ]

Are you for the repealing of the law “Amendments to the National Security Law” of March 1, 2007?Are you for the repealing of the law “Amendments to the State Security Authorities Law” of March 1, 2007?

References

External links

* [http://www.cvk.lv/cvkserv/TN_2007/likumu_brosura1.pdf Comparision of national security laws with and without amendments]