- IMSA GT Championship
Infobox motorsport championship
pixels =
caption =
category =Sportscar racing
country/region =North America
inaugural = 1971
inaugural2 =
folded = 1998
drivers =
teams =
constructors =
engines =
tyres =
champion driver =
champion team =
manufacturer =
website =IMSA GT was a
sports car racing series organized byInternational Motor Sports Association . Races took place primarily in theUnited States and occasionally inCanada .History
The series debuted in 1971. It was originally aimed at two of
FIA 's stock car categories running at two different classes, the GT (Group 3 and 4) and Touring (Group 1 and 2) cars. The first race was held atVirginia International Raceway ; it was an unexpected hit with both the drivers and a handful of spectators who attended. [http://alex62.typepad.com/imsablog/2006/01/do_you_want_to_.html IMSA blog: Do you want to know about GT racing in the 70s] ]For the following year, Bishop brought in sponsor
R. J. Reynolds and in 1975, introduced a new category called All American Grand Touring (AAGT). In 1977, the series would go through a series of major changes. IMSA permitted turbocharged cars for the first time as well as introducing a new category called GTX for cars based on the Group 5 rules. In 1981, after Bishop decided to not follow FIA's newly introducedGroup C rules, so he introduced the GTP class forsports prototype s. In 1989, Bishop sold off his organization. After a period of decline in the early 1990s, the Worlds Sports car category was introduced in 1993 to replace the GTP category in 1994.After a period of multiple ownerships, the organization was eventualy renamed Professional Sports Car Racing (PSCR). In 1999, PSCR decided to drop their own championship in order to sanction a new
American Le Mans Series . Despite various names, the GT series was known commonly as the IMSA series as it had been the organization's dominant series.Initial divisions
The 1971 season was the first racing season, and featured six races. GT cars, similar to the European classes Group 2 and Group 4, were competing in the early seasons. They were divided into four groups.
*GTO cars were Grand Touring type cars with an engine of 2.5 L displacement or more. This category was dominated by the Porsche RSRs, then by the Camaros, Mustangs and then the various factory teams consisting of Cougars, RX-7s, Celicas and finally, the 300ZX.
*GTU cars were Grand Touring type cars with engines of 2.5 L displacement or less. This series was dominated by the
Porsche 911 , then theDatsun 280ZX and finally by the SA22Mazda RX-7 s (1978-1985) through the end of the 80's.*TO were a touring-type car such as Camaro with an engine of 2.5 L or more displacement.
*TU were a touring-type car with an engine of 2.5 L or less displacement.
History of the top series in the GT championship
The Camel GT era
The first champions were
Peter H. Gregg andHurley Haywood , in aPorsche 914-6 GT U. Common winners in these early years of IMSA were thePorsche 911 Carrera RSR andChevrolet Corvette . Camel became the title sponsor during the second season, and the series became known as "Camel GT Challenge Series". The sponsor's corporate decal had to be displayed in a visible manner on the left and right side of the car, and its patch on the Nomex driver's uniform's breast area, featuring Joe Camel smiling and smoking a cigarette while driving a race car. [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1973/Mid-Ohio-1973-07-15-0000.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Mid-Ohio 6 Hours 1973] ]Initially, cars were marked visibly with its category tag, stating which category they belong, [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1973/Mid-Ohio-1973-07-15-023.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Mid-Ohio 6 Hours 1973] ] but onward from the middle of the 1975 season, all cars within the series had to bear a rectangular "IMSA GT" decal, which incorporated its logo on the left followed by a large GT tag. [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1975/Mid-Ohio-1975-08-24-032.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Laguna Seca 100 Miles I 1975] ] as well as Joe Camel decal.
Starting fields of 30 or more competitors were not unusual during this era. One of the premiere race events was the "Paul Revere 250" which started at the stroke of midnight of the 4th of July. The race was conducted entirely during the night from start to finish. Fact|date=May 2007
In 1974 a new category called All American Grand Touring (AAGT) was introduced to counteract the Porsche dominance in GTO. Prototypes: The History of the IMSA GTP Series, J. A. Martin & Ken Wells, David Bull Publishing, ISBN 1893618013]
This category did not run without controversy. In 1981,
Bob Sharp Racing team used a loophole in the rules to build aDatsun 280ZX inside the U.S. with a V8 engine from aNissan President . This car was not a success and became obsolete when the new GTP category was created. Essential Datsun Z 240Z to 280Zx: The Cars and Their Story 1969-83, Colin Shipway, Motorbooks International, ISBN 1870979516] The TU would be phased out in 1976 along with the TO for the following year.Turbochargers were not permitted until the mid-1977 season. They became permitted after protests by Porsche's motorsport department after inspecting
Al Holbert 's AAGT winningChevrolet Monza , which had won two titles. Prior to 1977, Porsche privateers struggled with obsolete 911 Carrera RSRs against the AAGT cars. 930 to 935: The Turbo Porsches, John Starkey, Renwick & Starkey Ltd. ISBN 0966509412]Engine sizes were determined by IMSA officials, who had devised a set of rules to determine fair competition, using a displacement versus minimum weight formula. Turbochargers were taken into account as well as rotary power, fuel injection, and many other engine features. [http://alex62.typepad.com/imsablog/2007/02/gto_the_big_ste.html IMSA blog: GTO : the big step ahead] ]
As a result, the new premier class known as GTX (Grand Touring Experimental, which was based on FIA's Group 5), brought on the absolute dominance of the
Porsche 935 . The 935 became the most successful car in the series. Fact|date=May 2007 The most successful driver of the seventies wasPeter Gregg , who won championships in 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1978, and 1979. Twin turbos were eliminated at the end of the 1982 season after John Paul andJohn Paul, Jr. dominated in a modified 935.The GT spaceframe era
In 1984, GT cars were required to bear a large square decal to determine which category each cars are represented in, GTU would therefore bear a black U on white [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1984/Daytona-1984-02-05-007.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Daytona 24 Hours 1984] ] and white O on black to represent GTO [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1984/Daytona-1984-02-05-0001.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Daytona 24 Hours 1984] ] . All others only bore their standard IMSA GT decals. [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1984/Daytona-1984-02-05-009.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Daytona 24 Hours 1984] ]
One big change to the rules during the 1980s was the 2.5 liter ceiling having been changed to 3.0 liters, with the maximum of 6.0 liter ceiling still in place. As for the complex set of series rules, 3.0L cars was required to weigh 1900 lb. whereas 6.0L weighed no less than 2700 lb. 2 valve turbocharged cars were given an extra 15% weight and 4 valve turbocharged, 20% extra. Electrical fuel injection was to become common and ground effects were prohibited.
Steering, braking, transmission and suspension could be left up to the constructor. Bigger and more powerful engines were permitted under homologation rules. Other items that had to be left as unchanged were the number of valves, ports and spark plugs of the original configuration.
Also within the category, one of the biggest changes as one team discovered a loophole was the AAR
Toyota team when, with its introduction of the new fourth generation Celica for the US market and the teams first entry into the top flight GTO category, despite not having to win one single GTU title, [http://alex62.typepad.com/imsablog/2006/07/all_american_ra.html IMSA blog: All American Racers : part 1, the GT cars] ] the team was to face a possibility that they would end up racing a front wheel drive car until they managed to persuade IMSA to rework the rules, determining that a car does not have to race in its original drivetrain, therefore with a redesigned chassis, the car was converted to rear wheel drive, [http://www.allamericanracers.com/celicas.html The Angriest Celicas by Matthew Hayashibara, Sports Compact Car, September 1999] ] . Another advanced features is the 4T-GT engine, from itsSafari Rally winningGroup B predecessor producing of around 475hp. and its features mentioned above. Piloted by the likes ofChris Cord ,Willy T. Ribbs andDennis Aase , the car was proven to be dominant within its class until the teams defection to GTP, utilizing the same engine, becoming dominant once again. Other teams would follow this example, notablyChevrolet Beretta (in the Trans-Am series) andMazda MX-6 (in IMSA GTU).The Celica was one of the few example of cars that had broken away from its production GT derivatives of the earlier years as with full
spaceframe chassis, they became serious race cars. By 1987, the category became dominated by factory teams, with testing sessions becoming common and rules tailored to welcome them in, rather than turn them away, other than that, cars were required to resemble their showroom counterpart with oversized fenders as they were not permitted to be over the width of 79 inches.There were no restrictions to body materials as most teams favored removable fiberglass and one of the only that remains of the production counterpart is the sheet steel roof.
Another car that exploited the rule system was
Audi 's 90, with its highly advancedfour wheel drive system, the car had a potential to become a car to beat during the 1989 season, although the car was proven to be dominant, despite heavy competitions from two factory teams,Roush Racing Mercury Cougar XR7 andClayton Cunningham Racing Nissan 300ZX , taking seven wins out of fifteen, as Audi stayed away from the early season endurance classics (Daytona and Sebring) as well as having two cars out of the race in two different rounds, [http://www.wspr-racing.com/wspr/results/imsa/tableimsagtomakes.html#1989GTO WSPR Racing: 1989 IMSA GTO makes] ] therefore costing them the title for both makes and driver (Hans-Joachim Stuck ).Another manufacturer to experience a run of wins was
Mazda . After some success by theMazda RX-2 andMazda RX-3 , theMazda RX-7 won its class in the IMSA24 Hours of Daytona race ten years in a row, starting in 1982, and won the IMSA GTU championship each year from 1980 through 1987. The car went on to win more IMSA races in its class than any other model of automobile, with its one hundredth victory onSeptember 2 1990 . [http://alex62.typepad.com/imsablog/2006/02/mazda_rx7_winni.html IMSAblog: Mazda RX7 : winningest car ever] ]The GTP Era
In 1981, purpose-built GTP prototypes, similar to the new FIA
Group C , were introduced in theWorld Endurance Championship . The main difference between the two categories was the former had no emphasis on fuel consumption which was highlighted by Derek Bell quoting "race fans do not come to races to watch an economy run!".Brian Redman was the first champion of the GTPs, driving a Lola T600. March also fielded prototypes, in whichAl Holbert won the 1983 championship, andRandy Lanier a year later. 1984 also saw the introduction of thePorsche 962 , which dominated the series from 1985 to 1987.Nissan then took control of the series in 1988, but faced challenges from Jaguar,Porsche , andToyota throughout the proceeding three years.Toyota was quickest in 1992 and 1993 at the end of GTP era. Along with the GTP cars, the Camel Lights lightweight, an under three liter low horsepower prototype category was introduced in 1985. Argo were the first Lights champions, followed by Spice. Well known were also Tiga,Royale ,Alba ,Fabcar , and Kudzu.Starting from the 1986 season, the GTP category had their own decal, which similar to the IMSA GT side decal, an extra P was added to denote their category [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1986/Daytona-1986-02-02-0004.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Daytona 24 Hours 1986] , Camel Lights cars also bore the same decal [ [http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1986/Daytona-1986-02-02-006.jpgRacing Sports Cars: Daytona 24 Hours 1986] ]
There were many other manufacturers in the GTP class, such as
URD , Spice, Intrepid orGebhardt , and in the early 1990s,Mazda .Fall of GTP
Following a successful heart surgery in 1987, Bishop began to rethink his priorities. He was approached by
Mike Cone andJeff Parker , owner ofTampa Race Circuit . In January 1989 Bishop and France sold the series to Cone and Parker. The new owners relocated the IMSA headquarters fromConnecticut toTampa Bay . Bishop would stand down as president in favor ofMark Ruffauf , who was his deputy and its representative on the ACCUS board. Endurance Racing 1982-1991, Ian Briggs, Osprey Automotice, ISBN 1855322285] Cone and Parker sold it to businessmanCharles Slater . Both lost millions attempting to revive the sagging TV ratings.By 1992, there were a number of factors that led to the decline of the GTP category. Porsche concentrated on its
IndyCar program when critics stated that theZuffenhausen marque should have built a followup of its 962. Back in 1988, Al Holbert realized that the 962 was beginning to feel dated. He proposed a follow up open top Porsche powered racer which would also be sold to customer teams. That project never got off the ground after Holbert's death in an aircraft accident later in the year. For some, much of the blame was on organization to allow the Japanese Works teams to dominate the series. Under Bishop's original vision, privateers and Works were able to race equally. Privateer teams to walked away, and the Japanese economy started to go downhill. These factors led Nissan and Mazda to walk away from the series. Critics say that the diminished variety of cars that would disappoint race fans which would finally kill the series off in 1993. GTP cars ran their last race onOctober 2 ,1993 atPhoenix International Raceway . cite web |url=http://www.ferraris-online.com/Articles/CarMag_9312.shtml |title=The Last Race |accessdate=2007-05-15 |author=Michael Strahan |year=1993 |month=December |work=Car Magazine]The GTP category was credited for many innovations in the U.S. including
antilock brakes ,traction control , andactive suspension . Dave Cowart and Kemper Miller'sRed Lobster sponsored team of the early 1980s would innovate racing team hospitalities which became adopted by virtually every other teams in the future. . But for those who competed, it was credited for itscamaraderie within drivers, especially rivals. Hans Stuck, commenting in theforeword of the book Prototypes: The History of the IMSA GTP Series, sarcastically compared the series' camaraderie to Formula One's lack of such.World Sports Cars
With rising costs and factory teams walking away from the series which meant diminishing entries, IMSA introduced a new
prototype category for in 1993 called World Sport Car (WSC). The WSC replaced the GTP and Lights closed-top cars for the following year. The WSC cars were open-top, flat-bottomed sports-prototypes with production engine as opposed to racing versions of production engines from GTP cars.The WSC cars made their debut at the
Miami Grand Prix with a sole entry ofBrent O'Neill . The car finished last among the cars that were still running. After skipping the12 Hours of Sebring , the category would compete for the remainder of the season as non-championship rounds, with no more than four cars entering. In 1994 Camel would be replaced byExxon as the title sponsor. However, as the WSC cars took over as the leading category, their reliability would be tested at the opening round at the 24 Hours of Daytona. Two cars started on the front row, with eight WSC cars competing. Two cars finished the race, with the leading WSC car finishing ninth behind GT cars. The WSC cars would score its first podium finish at Sebring with a second and third place behind a Daytona winning GTS categoryNissan 300ZX . That led to a rule change for the latter category as they would be barred from using engines that were originally for GTP cars. At the inaugural round for WSC cars atRoad Atlanta , the newFerrari 333 SP would make its debut in a mass media fanfare and win its debut race. The car regularly appearing on the podium on every rounds after that.Oldsmobile won the manufacturer's title overFerrari by four points.In 1995, a new rival for Ferrari appeared in the
Riley & Scott Mk III. The car would make its debut at Daytona, but would retire after the eleventh lap after an engine failure. Ferrari would help the category to score an overall win at the12 Hours of Sebring , and would take the title for both makes and driver. The Ferrari and the R&S cars were the dominant racers of the series from 1995 to the demise of IMSA at the end of 1998.In 1996 Slater sold the organization to
Roberto Muller (ex-CEO ofReebok ) andWall Street financierAndy Evans , who also was an IndyCar owner and owner/driver of the Scandia WSC team. Evans and VP of Marketing Kurtis Eide were responsible for the name change to Professional Sports Car Racing (PSCR).In 1992, the long running category American Challenge would step into the GT series. It became known as the GTO category when the former GTO category was renamed to GTS (Grand Touring Supreme). The move was prompted by sponsor
Exxon , who wanted the series named after its subbrand of fuel. [http://www.wspr-racing.com/wspr/results/imsa/nf_imsa_home.html WSPR-Racing.com] ] In 1995, in a bid to move close to the EuropeanBPR Global GT Series , the GT category would undergo another major reformat. GTS became known as GTS-1, and GTU became known as GTS-2. In 1997, there was another category addition. GTS-2 became GTS-3, new GTS-2 category was announced to allow for the existing GT2 cars.End of an era
Under tremendous pressure from team owners and management Evans sold the series to
Don Panoz in 2001. The purchase solidified the sanction for Panoz'sAmerican Le Mans Series (ALMS) which had been sanctioned by PSCR since 1999. Don Panoz renamed the sanctioning organization back to IMSA and is now the official sanctioning body of the ALMS, the Star Mazda series and thePanoz GT Pro series. The ALMS uses regulations based on those of the24 Hours of Le Mans , but in 2005 the relationship between Panoz and the Le Mans organizers, ACO, has become problematic.A breakaway series formed in 1998 involving the
Sports Car Club of America and running under the name of theUnited States Road Racing Championship . It was headed by a group of competitors wanting to keep rules within the United States. After failing by 1999 the series was taken over by theGrand American Road Racing Association with the full support ofNASCAR 's France family and renamed the Grand American Road Racing Championship, later renamed theRolex Sports Car Series . The series struggled early on, but has proven to be a formidable competitor to the ALMS in recent years with big name drivers, considerably larger fields, and much closer competition. Much like the split betweenChamp Car and the IRL critics say this split has been detrimental to the sport as a whole. Fact|date=May 2007 Attendance, sponsorships and media coverage have dropped dramatically since the split in 1998.After the series demise, a US based
historical racing organisation,Historic Sportscar Racing (HSR) created a new series to put GTP and Group C cars that had been stored away to be put back onto the track, the series was called HSR ThunderSport, this would spark another similar revival series in Europe which then another UK based series would be formed called Group C/GTP Racing, of this date both series are still running as well as appearing in historical events.Fact|date=May 2007References
External links
* [http://alex62.typepad.com/imsablog/ IMSA History]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.