Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko

Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 1, 2001
Decided November 27, 2001
Full case name Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
Holding
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
Concurrence Scalia, joined by Thomas
Dissent Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer

Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) should not be extended to allow recovery against a private corporation operating a halfway house under contract with the Bureau of Prisons.

A Bivens action is a civil rights violation suit against the government under Section 1983. The High Court limited this court invented private right of action to exclude corporate defendants. Plaintiff's actions against the individual employees were barred by the statute of limitations because the names of the John Doe defendant prison guards (esp. Jorge Urena) were not known to the plaintiff.

See also

External links

  • Text of Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001) is available from: Justia · Findlaw



Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Correctional Services Corporation — (CSC), originally Esmor Correctional Corporation, was founded by James F. Slattery in 1987. It is located in Sarasota, Florida, USA, and traded on the NASDAQ (NASDAQ NMS:CSCQ). It is a corporation specializing in the privatization of correctional …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”