- Bob Jones University v. United States
Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=Bob Jones University v. United States
ArgueDate=October 12
ArgueYear=1982
DecideDate=May 24
DecideYear=1983
FullName=Bob Jones University v. United States
USVol=461
USPage=574
Citation=103 S. Ct. 2017; 76 L. Ed. 2d 157; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 36; 51 U.S.L.W. 4593; 83-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9366; 52 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5001
Prior=Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Subsequent=
Holding="Neither petitioner qualifies as a tax-exempt organization... [i] t would be wholly incompatible with the concepts underlying tax exemption to grant tax-exempt status to racially discriminatory private educational entities. Whatever may be the rationale for such private schools' policies, racial discrimination in education is contrary to public policy. Racially discriminatory educational institutions cannot be viewed as conferring a public benefit within the above 'charitable' concept or within the congressional intent underlying 501(c)(3)." [ [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=461&page=574] Full text of the opinion on Findlaw.com]
SCOTUS=1981-1986
Majority=Burger
JoinMajority=Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Powell (part III)
Concurrence=Powell (concurring in part, concurring in the judgment)
Dissent=Rehnquist
LawsApplied=26 U.S.C. § 170, § 501(c)(3)"Bob Jones University v. United States," ussc|461|574|1983, was a decision by the
United States Supreme Court that held that theInternal Revenue Service could, without the approval of theUnited States Congress , revoke the tax exempt status of organizations that are contrary to establishedpublic policy .Background
Bob Jones University , because of its interpretation of Biblical principles, denied "admission to applicants engaged in an interracial marriage or known to advocate interracial marriage or dating." The University had received a ruling letter in 1942, confirming its tax exempt status.The University was notified
November 30 ,1970 that the IRS was planning on revoking their tax exempt status as a "religious, charitable . . . or educational" institution. In response, the University filed suit in 1971 in "Bob Jones University v. Schultz ."The
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina granted apreliminary injunction , but theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed in 1973, citing theAnti-Injunction Act .The University petitioned for a rehearing in the Appeals Court in "
Bob Jones University v. Connally ." The Appeals Court ruledMarch 21 ,1973 , stating that "Americans United v. Walters " did not conflict with the decision in 1973.The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals decision in "
Bob Jones University v. Simon " (416 US 725). The case was decidedMay 15 ,1974 , in an 8-0 decision (Douglas not participating). They stated that there was a lack of proof of "irreparable injury." Justice Powell wrote the decision.The IRS again notified the University on
April 16 ,1975 of the proposed revocation. Officially, the IRS revoked the University's tax exempt status onJanuary 19 ,1976 . The University paid $21 in unemployment taxes for one employee for tax year 1975 and then filed for a refund in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The Government counterclaimed for unpaid federal unemployment taxes for the taxable years 1971 through 1975, in the amount of $489,675.59, plus interest.The District Court ruled
December 26 ,1978 that the IRS had violated the University's First Amendment rights, and ordered the IRS to refund the University the $21 of taxes that it had paid.The United States Court of Appeals of the Fourth Circuit ruled that the case be sent back to the District Court
The Supreme Court decision
"Bob Jones University v. United States" was decided
May 24 ,1983 in an 8-1 decision with majority opinion written byWarren E. Burger , and joined byWilliam J. Brennan ,Byron R. White ,Thurgood Marshall ,Harry A. Blackmun ,John Paul Stevens , andSandra Day O'Connor . The Court, speaking through Burger, read a "common law" public interest requirement into the statute governing tax-exempt charitable status, and cited Congress' refusal to intervene as proof that they approved of the IRS's construction of the statute.Lewis F. Powell wrote a separate concurring opinion, emphasizing the importance of Congressional approval for administrative policy changes.William H. Rehnquist was the sole dissenter, arguing that the literal terms of the governing statute could not be read to exclude Bob Jones from charitable status.Aftermath
The case has been cited in many decisions that followed as well as by commentators, due to the significance of the precedent established in this case. A recent discussion in NRB Magazine pointed to the case as potential grounds for removing tax exempt status from
Christian broadcasters who do not supportgay rights .The ban on interracial dating was lifted in 2000 after Dr. Bob Jones III, following a media uproar prompted by the visit of presidential candidate
George W. Bush , announced its nullification on "Larry King Live ".ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 461 Notes and references
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.