California Proposition 62 (2004)

California Proposition 62 (2004)

Proposition 62 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 5,119,155 (46.1%) votes in favor and 5,968,770 (53.9%) against.

It was an initiative constitutional amendment and statute that provided for a "modified blanket" primary election system like that used in the state of Louisiana. It was officially known as the "Voter Choice Open Primary Act". Instead of traditional partisan primaries for statewide offices, voters would have been allowed to vote for any candidate in a primary election regardless of the political affiliation of the voter or candidates. The two candidates with the most votes (regardless of party or lack thereof) would later appear on the general election ballot.

Proposition 62 would have affected elections to the following offices:
*California offices:
**Governor
**Lieutenant Governor
**Attorney General
**Insurance Commissioner,
**Controller
**Secretary of State
**Treasurer
**Member of the State Legislature
**Member of the Board of Equalization
*Federal offices:
**Member of the United States House of Representatives
**Member of the United States Senate

Proposition 62 exempted U.S. presidential nominations.

The provisions of Proposition 62 conflicted with those of Proposition 60, which essentially re-affirmed the existing partisan primary system. The California Constitution provides that if the provisions of two approved propositions are in conflict, only the provisions of the measure with the higher number of "yes" votes at the statewide election take effect. (Since Prop. 60 passed and 62 did not, the issue was moot.)

Official summary

* Requires primary elections where all voters may vote for any state or federal candidate regardless of how a voter or candidate is registered.
* Exempts presidential nominations and elections of party central committees.
* Only the two primary-election candidates receiving most votes for an office, whether they are candidates with "no party" or members of same or different party, would be listed on general election ballot.
* In special primary election, candidate receiving majority vote is elected.
* Requires political party's consent for identification of candidates' party registration on ballot and in other official election publications.

Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact:
* No significant net fiscal effect on state and local governments.

See also

List of California ballot propositions 2000-present

External links

* [http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/propositions/prop62-title.htm Voter Information Guide with text of Proposition 62]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • California Proposition 1A (2004) — Proposition 1A was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. The proposition successfully passed with 9,411,198 (83.7%) votes in favor and 1,840,002 (16.3%) against.The proposition is intended to protect revenues… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 64 (2004) — Proposition 64 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 6,571,694 (59.0%) votes in favor and 4,578,725 (41.0%) against. It was an initiative statute that limits California s Unfair Competition… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 69 (2004) — California Proposition 69 was a successful 2004 California ballot proposition that allows for the collection of DNA samples from all felons and from people who have been arrested for certain crimes.… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 56 (2004) — Proposition 56 was a proposition in the U.S. state of California on the March 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 2,185,868 (34.3%) votes in favor and 4,183,188 (65.7%) against. It was intended to penalize politicians for every day that the… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 60A (2004) — Proposition 60A was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 7,776,374 (73.3%) votes in favor and 2,843,435 (26.7%) against. It was a legislative constitutional amendment intended to direct funds… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 57 (2004) — Proposition 57 was a proposition in the state of California on the March 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 4,056,313 (63.4%) votes in favor and 2,348,910 (36.6%) against. It was officially called The Economic Recovery Bond Act . The proposition… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 60 (2004) — Proposition 60 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 7,227,433 (67.6%) votes in favor and 3,478,774 (32.4%) against. It was a legislative constitutional amendment intended to codify in the… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 65 (2004) — Proposition 65 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 3,901,748 (37.6%) votes in favor and 6,471,506 (62.4%) against. It was a state constitutional amendment that would have required… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 58 (2004) — Proposition 58 was a proposition in the state of California on the March 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 4,535,084 (71.2%) votes in favor and 1,841,138 (28.8%) against. It was officially called The California Balanced Budget Act . It forces state… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 63 (2004) — Proposition 63 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. The ballot measure was officially known as the Mental Health Services Act . It passed with 6,191,691 (53.8%) votes in favor and 5,337,216 (46.2%) against …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”