Sit-up (exercise)

now consider it dangerous and relatively ineffective, replacing it with the crunch in many training programs as an abdominal exercise.

Criticism

Although still common in military training, martial arts, and mass taught exercise classes, the conventional sit-up is sometimes considered dangerous by modern experts, and has largely been replaced by the crunchwhen, for the following reasons:

Risks to vertebral column

Full sit-ups involve the hip flexors, as well as abdominal muscles. This can cause the back to arch, with the risk of spinal damage. This is a particular risk for individuals with weak abdominal muscles, but also for individuals who train aggressively, exhausting their abdominal muscles in a training session. Even if these risks are avoided, the leverage exerted by the hip flexors risks compression of the lumbar intervertebral discs.cite web | url = http://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article%20folder/abdominal.html | title = SuperAbs Resource Manual | last = Kravitz | first = Len | accessdate = 2007-09-24 ] Most branches of the US armed forces have ceased using sit-ups in training because of the problems resulting from these factors, which can include direct back damage and referred pain or numbness due to pinching of the spinal cord.cite web | url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200211/ai_n9165660 | last = Szasz | first = Anna | title = An electromyographical evaluation of the validity of the 2-minute sit-up section of the Army physical fitness test in measuring abdominal strength and endurance | date = 2002-11-01 | accessdate = 2007-09-24 ]

According to the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health,a straight leg sit-up generates approximately 3500 newtons (790 lbf) of force on the spine, and a bent-knee sit-up 3350 newtons (750 lbf), both levels above the 3300 newtons (740 lbf) that correlates highly with lower back injury. [http://sportscenteraustin.blogs.com/the_view/2006/01/stop_sit_ups_an.html]

Hip flexor involvement

Modern research suggests that the abdominal muscles are responsible for only the first 30° of lift in a sit up — effectively the part of the motion where the shoulders only leave the ground. The hip flexors are responsible thereafter. This diversion of effort from the abdominals reduces the effectiveness of training for purposes of abdominal isolation and makes the sit-up a test of combined spinal and hip flexion rather than spinal flexion alone.

it-ups and six packs

Strength exercises such as sit-ups and push-ups do not cause the spot reduction of fat. Gaining a 'six pack' requires both abdominal hypertrophy training and fat loss over the abdomen — which can only be done by losing fat from the body as a whole.

The Janda sit-up

Attributed to Czechoslovakian physiologist Dr. Vladimir Janda, this form of sit-up attempts to use the principle of reciprocal inhibition to prevent the hip flexors from being recruited during a sit-up. [http://xercisefactor.com/view_video.php?viewkey=3f91bf3c48159f7c24f7&page=1&viewtype=&category=mr Janda Sit-Up] It will rarely totally inactivate them, but rather weaken hip flexor involvement. If the lower back has left the ground during the situp, the hip flexors must have been recruited to some degree. Reciprocal inhibition applies mostly to generating maximal force, the ability to flex the biceps where the elbow flexors and extensors contact concurrently proves that reciprocal inhibition is not absolute.

This hypothesis has since been discredited as findings from Junker et al. (1998) show that rectus abdominus activity was not altered by the heel press technique and in fact psoas activity was increased with the heel press technique, though it should be taken into account that a correctly-performed janda sit-up involves a much more involved hip extensor contraction than that involved in simply pressing one's heels into the floor. [ [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9502361 Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of... [Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 - PubMed Result ] ]

References