- Amphibious assault submarine
An amphibious assault submarine is a (still theoretical)
submarineequivalent of an amphibious assault ship. While such ships have been proposed in the past by both the U.S. and the Soviet Union, none has ever been built (though at least one of the larger Soviet designs did start construction). Converted or standard submarines have often been used to transport small groups of soldiers or supplies, however. [ [http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/ssg-282.htm SS / SSG / APSS / LPSS 282 Tunny] (submarine datasheet from the globalsecurity.orgwebsite)]
In the Soviet Union
The Soviet Union had some experiences using submarines to shuttle weapons, supplies and special forces into besieged areas or behind enemy lines in
World War II, specifically during the siege of Sevastopol. " [http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_13/soviets_giants.html The First Soviet Giants] " - Polmar, Norman, book excerpts adapted for "Undersea Warfare", Fall 2001, Issue 4, Vol 1]
Initial designs: Project 621
Directly after the war, in 1948, Project 621 was proposed as a landing ship-transport submarine to set down troops behind enemy lines. With some 5,950 tons, the underwater giant would have been one of the largest submarines of its day. On its two vehicle decks, it was to carry a full infantry battalion of 745 troops, 10 T-34 tanks, 12 trucks, 12 towed cannon, and 3 catapult-launched La-5 fighter aircraft for air cover. The troops and vehicles meanwhile would be unloaded over a bow ramp when the submarine beached on the surface.
Delays, aborted work: Project 664
While Project 621 was not built, follow-up designs got even larger and even more ambitious, though this was eventually to be their downfall as well. The additional capabilities, from being expected to do
underway replenishmentfor other submarines to being capable of providing submarine rescue tended to delay the projects which were otherwise considered fully feasible. At least one, Project 664, started construction at Severodvinskin 1964, but the mixed requirements of replenishment, transport, and mine-laying caused major complications in combination, even with the proposed nuclear propulsion.
Other needs first: Project 748
In the late 1960s, another proposal, Project 748, neared construction, a nuclear-powered assault transport (with less added requirements than previous designs) of up to 11,000 tons. This submarine was to carry up to 20 amphibious tanks and BTR-60P armored personnel carriers, and up to 470 troops, with the vehicles stored in double-deck hulls contained to both sides of the main hull, all three within an outer shell. The submarine was to be equipped with a torpedo armament of four bow 21 inch (533 mm) torpedo tubes (18 to 20 torpedoes stored) as well as anti-aircraft guns and surface-to-air missiles. It also was to have mine-laying capabilities.
In the end, while the shipyards had already begun to prepare for the production of five submarines of the 748 type, this project was also scrapped in the early 1970s, as the manufacturing capacity was needed for new
ballistic missile submarines.
In the United States
U.S. Navyhas in the past also undertaken some preliminary design of submarine transports, but never the extent of the Soviet design efforts. In the 1950s a 10,000-ton submarine was proposed, 220 meters (720 ft) long, and with a beam of 38 meters (124 ft). It was to carry 2,240 Marines, landing them using 'amphibious flying platforms' with an undefined propulsion method, supposed to move at 100 mph (160 km/h).
However, many older submarines have been refitted during US naval history into transport submarines, mainly for use in covert operations, i.e.
special forcesdeployment. [ [http://www.hazegray.org/faq/smn7.htm#G8 US Covert operations submarines] (from the hazegrey.org private naval history website)]
Submarine aircraft carrier
I-400 class submarine
* [http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_13/soviets_giants.html The First Soviet Giants] " (book excerpts including sectional drawings of the transport submarines)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.