- Legal hold
A Legal hold is a process which an organization uses to preserve all forms of relevant information when
litigationis reasonably anticipated.
Recent amendments to the United States
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure(FRCP) address the discovery of electronically stored information (ESI) (aka e-discovery), expanding the use of a "legal hold" beyond preservation of paper documents. The amendments were written in anticipation of legal arguments and tacticsrelated to the production of ESI, such as the costand difficulty of producing such ESI and claims that such ESI was missing, deleted, or otherwise inaccessible when it really wasn’t the case. These changes took effect December 1, 2006 and require organizations to hold all electronic records until each legal matter is formally settled, even if an organization only reasonably anticipates litigation.
There are three main requirements that comprise a legal hold process:
An organization has a duty to preserve relevant information when it learns, or reasonably should have learned of pending or threatened litigation, or of a regulatory investigation. In order to comply with its preservation obligations, the organization should inform records custodians of the respective custodian’s duty to preserve relevant information. The organization should provide instructions for doing so. This traditionally cumbersome process may be automated with workflow to ensure all custodians receive a formal notice and agree to its terms.
This notification and subsequent related reminders should be created and distributed to specific custodians and should require the custodian to confirm receipt of such notification. This is far superior to the traditional use of read receipts reconciliation and follow-up because it allows for an unambiguous custodian response and provide real-time tracking and reporting on custodian responses. Further, automatic logging of all related
audittrail information related to the legal hold notification process is also highly recommended.
egregated repository for ESI
The process of identifying and eliminating non-relevant documents while identifying and preserving the needed documents out of a set of potentially relevant documents is “culling”. The relevant documents for the case are identified and preserved in a physical
repositoryof relevant or potentially relevant documents subject to the legal hold.
The system must make use of a highly accurate
policy-based approach that enables archived and current electronic communications – including e-mail, instant messages, web transactions and communications sent from handheld devices – to be categorized and tagged according to their relevance to specific corporate policy.
Due to the substantial
risks associated with deleting, losing, or not having access to such data, this should be a segregated repository to better deal with the unique retention requirements and access needs of this subset of an organization’s stored documents.
Ongoing preservation obligation
Once an organization is served with a litigation notice, all future relevant electronic communication is also subject to the legal hold.
* [http://www.thesedonaconference.org/dltForm?did=Legal_holds.pdf "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Legal Holds, August 2007"] Public Comment Version
* [http://www.edrm.net The Electronic Discovery Reference Model Project (EDRM)]
* [http://advisor.com/doc/18524 E-Discovery Advisor Article, "Understand Legal Hold Notification Changes"]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.