- Bangaru Thirumalai Nayak
Bangaru Thirumalai Nayak, also known as Bangaru Tirumalai and Vangaru Thirumala (as per European Records and notes), was a member of
Madurai Nayak family and Governor/Commander of the Madurai Nayak King Vijaya Ranga Chokkanatha (1704-1731). His son, a young boy was adopted and crowned to theMadurai Throne, with the queen Meenakshi as queen regent, when the Madurai king died without heir. Strife between Bangaru Thirumalai and queen Meenakshi would later erupt into many battles leading to the downfall of the dynasty. Later Bangaru Thirumala’s relatives and kin became rulers of Kandy kingdom inSri Lanka till 1815, when the last king was defeated and taken captive by the British toVellore Fort fromKandy .Family origins
Bangaru Tirumala was a member of the Madurai Royal family and one of the Governor/Commander of the Madurai Country in charge of Madurai and Tirunelveli regions. He was supposed to belong to another royal line of Kumara Muttu Nayak, the younger brother of
Thirumalai Nayak .Beginnings
When Vijaya Ranga Chokkanatha Nayak died in 1731 without an heir, one of his queens Meenakshi adopted Bangaru Thirumala’s son Vijayakumara then a young boy as an heir for the Madurai Throne and became Queen Regent for the adopted prince. During this time
Tiruchirapalli Fort was the headquarters of Madurai Kingdom, while Madurai was bifurcated into a Province, still retaining the vast Fort.Queen Meenakshi
When Queen Meenakshi took over the administration, the Kingdom was in deep trouble, with enemy troops of Delhi Sultans, Mysore armies and Maratha armies attempting to seize the throne. Also pilferage of enemy spies and widespread anarchy prevailed in the kingdom. The palace administrators were rampant on treason and corruption. The queen attempting to bring order, sacked many troublesome officials and commanders, and replaced them with better ones. She was also assisted by her brother Venkata Perumal Nayak and things looked better for a period.
Madurai throne claimants
Hardly a year or two passed when Bangaru Tirumala, feeling he to be a better bet to the throne instigated an insurrection against the queen. He was also joined by Queen Meenakshi’s recently ousted Minister “Dalavay Venkatachari”.Their first attempt at ousting the queen by attacking the Tiruchirapalli fort ended in a failure.
Bangaru Tirumala operated from Madurai Fort while the Queen held court from the Tiruchirapalli Fort Palace. During this period the Madurai Kingdom was a feudatory of the Delhi Sultanate, whose representative in the south was the
Nawab of Carnatic . TheNizam of Hyderabad held an intermediate authority.Bangaru Tirumala approached Safdar Ali Khan, son of the Carnatic Nawab, with an offer of three million rupees to oust the queen in favour of him. The latter after accepting the offer, settled the dispute in Bangaru Tirumala’s favour by declaring him as the King. Safdar Ali Khan then left to Arcot without attacking Meenakshi’s fort in Tiruchirapalli and left the matters to his kin and advisor Chanda Sahib to enforce the new events. The wily queen, not paying any attempt at the suspicious settlement, responded by offering Chanda Sahib a crore of rupees (ten million) and to declare her duly entitled to the throne.Startled at the detour of affairs Bangaru Tirumala left to Madurai, to rule over that province and
Tirunelveli , without wishing any harm to Chanda Sahib.End of Nayak dynasty
Bangaru Tirumala‘s withdrawal was only temporary as he collected a good number of discontents from the army and
Polygars again launched offensive attacks on the Tiruchirapalli Fort. Several battles and attacks continued on either sides, with Bangaru Tirumala finally seizing theDindigul Fort ,a key fort and territory in between the Madurai and Tiruchirapalli. Two years passed (1736), when Chanda Sahib returned to Trichrapalli, combining with Meenakshi, attacked Bangaru Tirumala, who was still ruling the southern provinces of Madurai. In a battle at Ammayanayakkanur nearDindigul , Bangaru Thirumala’s army, largely strengthened by some Polygars, fought a well-contested battle against the Queen and Chanda Sahib with over 80,000 soldiers, but was finally defeated, taking refuge inSivaganga palace. Chanda Sahib, after the victory over Bangaru Tirumala, proclaimed himself ruler of Meenakshi’s kingdom, after locking the queen up in her palace, later driving her to consume poison, thus putting an end to over 200 years of Nayak rule in Madurai.With the Tanjore Marathas
Bangaru Tirumala still undaunted joined with the Tanjore Marathas to oust Chanda Sahib. Tanjore Kingdom was recently (1740) attacked and subjugated by Chanda Sahib, compelling them to cede
Karaikal to the French, who were Chanda Sahib’s new ally. Also Chanda Sahib was left on his own by his Uncle Carnatic Nawab, but still suspicious over the former's ambitions.Bangaru Tirumala and the Tanjore King joined together and called in assistance of the
Marathas ofSatara inBombay . These people having their own grievances against the Carnatic Nawabs (with whom Chanda Sahib was still identified) marched down with a vast army in the south in 1741, first defeating and killing theNawab of Arcot in the Battle, later after a three months siege at Trichinopoly fort, took Chanda Sahib as a captive, killing both Chanda Sahib’s brothers.Finally in 1751, Chanda Sahib was captured after a series of
Carnatic Wars and beheaded by aTanjore general, Mankoji.Madurai again
The Marathas disregarding the claims of Bangaru Tirumala appointed a Maratha Morari Rao of
Gooty (in 1741), as their governor of the conquered kingdom. In 1744, the Nizam of Hyderabad sent an army to re-establish his weakened authority in the Carnatic making Morari Rao flee from Madurai. The Nizam appointed Anwar ud din as Nawab of Arcot, and ordered Vangaru Tirumala to be appointed to the Throne of Madurai. The rulers of Ramnad, Sivaganga, Tanjore were also keen on appointing Bangaru Tirumala on the throne thereby to retain a Hindu Kingdom.Thus for a brief period Bangaru Thirumala seemed to take the crown as a de-jure ruler, while the administrative control was carried out by the Muslim army. Bangaru was also repeatedly warned of attempts by Anwar -ud-din and his aides on plans to usurp the Throne. But very little is known afterwards as some sources point out that he was poisoned by Anwar -ud-din.Kandy
See
Nayaks of Kandy One section of Bangaru Thirumala’s family established themselves as rulers of Kandy; also the last dynasties to rule Sri Lanka. They are often mentioned asNayakkar Dynasty or Madurai Rulers or Nayaks of Kandy.The Kandy Mahanuwara kingdoms always had brides from the Nayak rulers of Madurai and Tanjore. When the King of Kandy Vira Parakrama Narendra Singha (1707-1739) whose queen was from Madurai Nayak family died in 1739,they crowned the Queen's brother from Madurai Nayak family as the next king of Kandy according to their Marumakkathayam law.
The new king (from Madurai), assuming throne as Vijaya Raja Singha, again married a queen Upendramma from Bangaru Thirumala’s family. Later the next two kings in line to the throne would be the queens’ two brothers (both from Madurai) and the last king who ruled from Kandy Sri Vikrama Raja Singha (1798-1815 AD), would be queen Upendramma’s nephew.
Other descendants
Several of Bangaru Thirumala’s descendants lived in the Vellaikurichi
Fort in Sivaganga Zamin, and their family living there till recent times. The Vellaikurichi Fort along with some encompassing villages was granted by theRaja of Sivaganga .In the 1820s, a descendant of Bangaru was reported to be in Madurai seeking pecuniary assistance from the government. Also it is reported, every year they conducted a ceremony of reciting poems of their royal forebears of their valour and deeds on the first day of Tamil month of Chittirai.
ee also
*
Nayaks of Madurai
*Madurai
*Nayaks of Kandy ources
*Biography of Dhandavarayan Pillai:Pradhani of Sivaganga Zamin; Author: Mu.Balakrishnan M.A.,M.Ed.; published by Manickvasagar Pathipagam, Chennai in 2005
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.